Are we really living in the reality we believe?

[Who Dares Win]

Have you ever wonder if we're not in the reality we believe we are?

I'm not talking about a matrix style simulation altough some things like dejavus are clearly interesting and the official explanation is not really that convincing.

I often see similarities between our lifes and softwares where a programmer can create an event that force the software to act in a certain way.

Think of the macro environment in terms of politics and economics working as a operation system update which necessarily lead secondary software to evolve themselves.

Also phenomenons which are hard to explain as the fibonacci sequences on organic growth or mathematical formulas that basically code what we find attractive and what is not.

Wheter we observe a flower or the proportions of a statue we can see precise numbers.

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

Indeed, if one has the time to ruminate in these subjects it can get kinda weird. Our whole universe could be a speck of dirt in the grander scheme. I trouble myself with more mundane issues since it’s a crazy maker. Now if I could plug my head in and become a grand master at shotokan that would be cool…heh

 

[FlexpertHamilton]

Our reality can only ever be what we experience.

It does not matter if it is code based; our conscious experience is the same.

 

[RickTheToad]

Have you ever wonder if we're not in the reality we believe we are?

I'm not talking about a matrix style simulation altough some things like dejavus are clearly interesting and the official explanation is not really that convincing.

I often see similarities between our lifes and softwares where a programmer can create an event that force the software to act in a certain way.

Think of the macro environment in terms of politics and economics working as a operation system update which necessarily lead secondary software to evolve themselves.

Also phenomenons which are hard to explain as the fibonacci sequences on organic growth or mathematical formulas that basically code what we find attractive and what is not.

Wheter we observe a flower or the proportions of a statue we can see precise numbers.

No. It's all an illusion. We're all being watched like in The Truman show.

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

Lol

 

[Serenity]

Reality is what you see before you interpret anything. What most people call truth these days is for the most part their interpretation of reality.

Deja Vu is more likely to be a result of how we process memories of similar past events. Memory is not as tell reliable as most people feel comfortable believing.

Mathematics is a system invented from our observations of reality, not the other way around. The plants were always this way, then we came along and invented a simple way to express what we saw.