“The 22 Psychological Triggers That Make Women Chase You… Starting Tonight”

Forget the cash, the cars, and the chiseled jawlines. Female desire operates on a completely different frequency. Primal. Subconscious. Triggers that bypass her logic and hit her on a gut level. Most guys are totally blind to them.

I know because I was one of them. The overthinking. The paralysis. The silent drive home kicking yourself for freezing up. Watching average guys walk away with the girl while you stood there stuck in your own head.

Then I decoded the psychology behind what actually makes women tick. 22 hard rules.  Subtle behavioral shifts that rewired my entire reality. The anxiety evaporated. Women started leaning in. Investing. Chasing.

Read more...

Are our modern alpha and beta distinctions f*cked up by civilisation?

AttackFormation

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
4,062
Reaction score
3,617
Age
33
Location
Sweden
You know, back when we lived in tribes and not cubicles an alpha was alpha *because* he was the best provider. Women had no problem finding alpha and beta in the same man because to be a provider you had to be alpha and vice versa.

So in the old days, you being alpha (basically a good physique, sex appeal to women) made you into a provider too because the best hunters, ie. the most alpha men, were the best providers. Being alpha enabled you to provide. But we live in a time in which being alpha doesn't mean being a provider and you can be a provider without being alpha. The only limiting factor would be if your genes were a bad match with hers (ie. incest).

Of course there are different mating strategies among animals, just look at the other great apes who have everything from (roughly summarised) alpha monopoly to free for all to promiscuous infanticide. But assuming that we used to run with alpha = provider = good mate, have we made ourselves go haywire?
 

Shivastorm_88

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
408
Reaction score
16
AttackFormation said:
You know, back when we lived in tribes and not cubicles an alpha was alpha *because* he was the best provider. Women had no problem finding alpha and beta in the same man because to be a provider you had to be alpha and vice versa.

So in the old days, you being alpha (basically a good physique, sex appeal to women) made you into a provider too because the best hunters, ie. the most alpha men, were the best providers. Being alpha enabled you to provide. But we live in a time in which being alpha doesn't mean being a provider and you can be a provider without being alpha. The only limiting factor would be if your genes were a bad match with hers (ie. incest).

Of course there are different mating strategies among animals, just look at the other great apes who have everything from (roughly summarised) alpha monopoly to free for all to promiscuous infanticide. But assuming that we used to run with alpha = provider = good mate, have we made ourselves go haywire?
Who cares? Society changed, you can either go with the flow and adapt yourself to it, or reminisce about the past being the "good old days long gone" and stagnate.
 

AttackFormation

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
4,062
Reaction score
3,617
Age
33
Location
Sweden
I don't care about the "righteousness" of either approach, I was just using harsh language.
 
Top