Serenity
Moderator
@Spaz and @Epic Days you're not getting my point...
She says the movie looks dumb; you suddenly agree. She tests you with a little attitude; you apologize for nothing.
You think you're being easy to get along with. She reads something else entirely: a man with no edges. Nothing to hold on to. No friction, no tension, no reason to wonder what he really thinks.
The "22 Rules" taught me to push back — playfully, calmly, without needing her approval. Strange things happened after that.
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
Its ironic. The pair bonding faculties are altered by the environment. Think, monkey see, monkey do. Little boys emulate the father. A boy who is raised up in a single mom household is emulating who? Molyneux suggested science showing women in single mom homes hit puberty quicker then in a household with a father. Showed similar science and sources during periods of war. A sort of defense mechanism.@DEEZEDBRAH posts and how he keeps harping on low testosterone? He is absolutely correct. The accepted medical levels of testosterone are way too low. This is NO accident. Your quality of life degrades rapidly.
Improperly channeling your natural aggressive nature into constructive and self serving endeavors will reduce you to a pathetic and easily manipulated man.
A man at 75 should have a testosterone level of around 700-800. There are young men out there with less than 500. The manipulation of girl diets shoved down men’s throats also contributes. Very much so.
The effort is to change biology through enforced or socially programmed actions. What they don’t tell you is that as long as men and women live long enough to procreate, there is no biological change in DNA.
Reducing men has really picked up since the 1950s.
Its ****ed. It is what it is.I don’t think anything about you. I am a decisive man. Better to be wrong than to be a Luke warm safe guy.
It just doesn’t add up. Leaving boys to be raised by feminine imperative parties that turn him into a noodle is pretty damn extreme.
C0ck on their heads from what?Its ironic. The pair bonding faculties are altered by the environment. Think, monkey see, monkey do. Little boys emulate the father. A boy who is raised up in a single mom household is emulating who? Molyneux suggested science showing women in single mom homes hit puberty quicker then in a household with a father. Showed similar science and sources during periods of war. A sort of defense mechanism.
The lack thereof of a father is detrimental and I am willing to bet, there's likely to be higher testosterone with then without assumption being, he is present and not checkef out piece of furniture. Furthermore, there's a difference in psychology from higher to lower testosterone and one's perspective on competition. Low testosterone is evident in one's inability to compete. Doesn't approach. Low sex drive. Cuckoldry, raising another man's baby, playing house with Chad's booty call, marrying cratered SMV, etc.
Its the participation ribbon and trophy generation. Women are growing a huge cawk on thrir heads. Men are urinating from the seated position. Welcome to clown World fellas. Enjoy the decline.