A touchy subject of ethics

[The Duke]

Here’s my question. Where did this idea of wanting a woman to butcher you come from? One with all kinds of programmed masculine traits buried in her. All the traits we like in ourselves we want in a woman. Who set up this diabolical self inflicted deathwish anyway?

I think feminine acting males desire more masculine women. It compliments what they are not. I also believe they aren't capable of keeping the most feminine women happy. A feminine male can't be her "rock" and stability as he is none of this. Feminine females depend on that.

 

[Spaz]

I think feminine acting males desire more masculine women. It compliments what they are not. I also believe they aren't capable of keeping the most feminine women happy. A feminine male can't be her "rock" and stability as he is none of this. Feminine females depend on that.

Females that take on masculine traits will never be happy.

If they take on feminine men, they will despise him in the long run.

In the end they'll yearn to have a more masculine male.

The feminine man is doomed unless he changes.

 

[Spaz]

Why would you do something for no reason? why would you sleep with a married woman when you have a single woman that's just as good to sleep with?

Like I said I'm familiar with this mindset and have acted on it. I had abundance of single and taken women. The truth is is that it's a product of a deep-rooted jadedness, nihilism, and even depression, as is the behavior of those taken women themselves.

What you're mentioned is true on the issue of taken women. But that's only 1 example of why some men go down that path. It's primarily driven by emotions - a highly emotional man will often succumb to this.

There r other reasons, some men don't discriminate, a pvssy is a pvssy regardless of it being married or not - if it's on offer they'll take. These men r just predatory by nature. There's no emotions involved other then satisfying his biological need to procreate.

There r others (psychopathic tendencies etc) but those I mentioned above are the major ones.

 

[Macaframalama]

This is the problem with simulated masculinity/bagging for sport. Has the game really devolved this far? Reminds me of the old pimp phrase "keep your **** in your pocket". This train of thought does nothing, but free her of any accountability or responsibility. She must bring more to the table, than her pvssy. Her pvssy doesn't make her valuable. Not when she's taking lots of cawk from Tom, **** and Harry and especially with easy pvssy being more available than ever. Idk about everybody else, but these scallywagger broads, with no standards, aren't exactly what me or any of my friends sit around and brag about after work over beers, and for reason. Not going to lie and say i haven't ever gotten hard up enough to lower my standards and throw it off in there a time or three, but that chit to me is like going to a fish farm to fish. Those b!tches are biting at anything thrown in the water, but whatever you feel you need to do. Not going to hold it against a man wanting to eat, when he's hungry. Amante has it right. Not being at one extreme or the other and dealing with each situation/woman as it/she is and what you're willing do deal with to see your needs met. If I'm putting in though, she's putting in just as much, preferably more, otherwise she has no value. To me anyways.

 

[Spaz]

Highly dependent on a man's inherent personality traits. There's 2 passive and 2 dominant personalities in the world of men.

Both you and amante r doers thus dominant personalities which guides you into that line of action.

The fastest, shortest and most likeliest outcome in any given situation will be taken - this is what makes men such as urself highly successful in ur taken field - a specialist like surgeons, engineers, great warriors, etc.

Then there's another dominant personality that comes into play, someone for example like Prophet Muhammad who shapes people into his frame.

 

[btownbuck2012]

I don’t agree with the relationship status. There are plenty of guys who would be more than willing to show up to your office or home with a rifle if they found out you were banging their woman.

 

[Ranger]

I don’t agree with the relationship status. There are plenty of guys who would be more than willing to show up to your office or home with a rifle if they found out you were banging their woman.

Lol if men did that, there would be bodies all through the streets. Stacks and stacks.

 

[btownbuck2012]

Lol if men did that, there would be bodies all through the streets. Stacks and stacks.

Why take the risk

 

[Ranger]

Why take the risk

I did say I go after married women. Earlier I said to the best of my knowledge I don’t know if I have but probably.
I did say that it doesn’t matter to me if she is. It’s not an immediate disqualification.
What’s the difference? A woman with an LTR boyfriend or a marriage?
Is a woman with a boyfriend ok? Who drew up that ethics plan? So one woman is off limits and if she chases you it’s not ok but for another, if she chases you it’s ok.