"I'm Not Looking for Anything Serious Right Now"

When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.

Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.

Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.

The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.

Read more...

A DJ Theory: Mathematically Proven! (now with calculator)

ElStud

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 29, 2007
Messages
1,897
Reaction score
24
Someone's smart so they're a geek, nice logic there.
 

"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

Slick101

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
453
Reaction score
4
Location
Bronx
ElStud said:
Someone's smart so they're a geek, nice logic there.
Thats not being smart, Thats actually being retarded of actually thinking of soemthing like that...

Why would you stress it to that level LOL

Do you know of anyone that would think like that?

I guarantee you he doesnt have success with woman
 

Night Owl

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jul 22, 2007
Messages
207
Reaction score
5
Location
UK
Well, as I have terminal dyslexia reading that was a complete and utter waste of time

All I can say is Dyslexia rules KO !!
 

Dongfu

Banned
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
943
Reaction score
5
Location
Wherever the Dong guides me, but mostly Hawaii
Why dont you try to explain this theory to a really drunk girl in a club. :D
 

"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"

I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.

The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.

Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.

Read more...

ElStud

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 29, 2007
Messages
1,897
Reaction score
24
Slick101 said:
Thats not being smart, Thats actually being retarded of actually thinking of soemthing like that...

Why would you stress it to that level LOL

Do you know of anyone that would think like that?

I guarantee you he doesnt have success with woman
And you do? Last I checked you were a keyboard jockie and you really have no proof of success.
 

Slick101

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
453
Reaction score
4
Location
Bronx
ElStud said:
And you do? Last I checked you were a keyboard jockie and you really have no proof of success.
HAHAHAHAHA....

Honestly I thought you were a cool kid, now I can really understand what kind of clue-less idiot you are....

I spend my time in clubs and hosted some too, I have girls I just wanted to give a shot at the community to see what its all about...

your a 17 year old kid that still needs tons of practice based on your own approaches...

Plus look at your number or posts and and my number KK.. thanksss

dont even bother answering to this cuz your just going to prove yourself even more retarded....:)
 

ElStud

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 29, 2007
Messages
1,897
Reaction score
24
Hey, no need to get defensive buddy. You clearly care way too much about what one person thinks. I'm just saying you act all big without really have any proof of success. So what if your post number is lower? Some of my FIRST posts where field reports.
 

belividere

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
956
Reaction score
5
Age
47
Slick101 said:
Thats not being smart, Thats actually being retarded of actually thinking of soemthing like that...
Brilliant
 

Slick101

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
453
Reaction score
4
Location
Bronx
ElStud said:
Hey, no need to get defensive buddy. You clearly care way too much about what one person thinks. I'm just saying you act all big without really have any proof of success. So what if your post number is lower? Some of my FIRST posts where field reports.
Field Reports yea...

That go no where LOL...

Why do I need to post my success I dont need to prove anything and I dont even have time to post field reports...

Im not saying I will never post them, when I'll get time Ill write that full essay
 

"She Wants a Man, Not a Boy"

You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.

Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.

Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.

Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.

Read more...

comic_relief

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Messages
3,282
Reaction score
49
Location
Baltimore, MD
bump... I have a math test tomorrow and this got me in the mood to go study.

comic_relief
 

ProDJ26

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
751
Reaction score
31
To the original poster of this thread:

feel free to come take my calc 2 finals!!!

:up:
 

Francisco d'Anconia

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 10, 2003
Messages
15,481
Reaction score
65
Location
Galt's Gulch
comic_relief said:
bump... I have a math test tomorrow and this got me in the mood to go study.

comic_relief
You're just trying to show up that midget rocket scientist from Moscow....
 

mikeyb

Senior Don Juan
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
472
Reaction score
16
Age
38
Location
UK
Was that whole thing supposed to be a pickup line?? D*mn, and I thought I was a geek.

Anyway, you can deduce N = D from the symmetry of your first equation, no need for all the calculus. I should know, I'm a maths major. So stop trying to impress.
 
Last edited:

"How I Made Sure No Woman Ever Friend-Zoned Me Again"

She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.

You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.

She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.

The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.

Read more...

comic_relief

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Messages
3,282
Reaction score
49
Location
Baltimore, MD
comic_relief said:
bump... I have a math test tomorrow and this got me in the mood to go study.

comic_relief
Damnit this came into my head halfway through the test and now I failed it!!!

DAMNIT!!!

comic_relief
 

ARrocket

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
37
Location
East Coast USA
Call me a nerd, but I just went through this entire thread waiting for SOMEONE to point out that he failed to use a damn Lagrange multiplier. Hello, constrained maximization...but anyway, I love this post.

ksoileau said:
Your first mistake occurred when you wrote

"MAX(D,N) = lnD + lnN - (Dt + Nt - T)

then, i take the partial derivative with respect to D, and N.

dMAX/dD = 1/D - t = 0 ---> t = 1/D
dMAX/dN = 1/N - t = 0 ---> t = 1/N "


You should have set up the Lagrange multiplier equation

MAX(D,N) = lnD + lnN + lambda*(Dt + Nt - T)

then
dMAX/dD =1/D+lambda*t
dMAX/dN =1/N+lambda*t

Then setting
dMAX/dD=0 yields 1/D+lambda*t=0
and setting
dMAX/dN=0 yields 1/N+lambda*t=0

thus 1/D=-lambda*t=1/N
hence
D=N
 

ArcBound

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
1,525
Reaction score
114
Location
U.S. East
ARrocket said:
Call me a nerd, but I just went through this entire thread waiting for SOMEONE to point out that he failed to use a damn Lagrange multiplier. Hello, constrained maximization...but anyway, I love this post.
Rofl this is funny because I learned how to do all this last semester in microeconomic theory.... yeah he could have used Lagrange but I think that would have made it even harder for everyone to understand :crazy:

Reminds me of another simpler joke http://www.anvari.org/fun/Gender/Proof_that_Girls_are_Evil.html :D
 

ARrocket

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
37
Location
East Coast USA
ArcBound said:
Rofl this is funny because I learned how to do all this last semester in microeconomic theory.... yeah he could have used Lagrange but I think that would have made it even harder for everyone to understand :crazy:

Reminds me of another simpler joke http://www.anvari.org/fun/Gender/Proof_that_Girls_are_Evil.html :D
Ha yeah, true story. Feels good knowing lot's and lot's of math! Also, loved the link. That one's going up on Facebook...
 
Top