backseatjuan
Banned
lol!
News came out at 0:17 today, that's around 8 a.m. Eastern U.S. time, so I guess bombing took place a few hours before it, title says during evening prayer. It was in the village of Al Adjina, near Aleppo.
U.S. officials say they were aiming at terrorists near mosque.
Let's depart from the story, because what's done is done, let's talk geopolitics, in particular what is NATO and Russia trying to achieve in Syria.
-Russian objective, control Syria, which gives control to Mediterranean, and much of middle east, the so called "rimland". That way WW3 will ignite bellow Russian territory.
-NATO's objective, control Syria, which gives it control to "rimland", that way WW3 will be fought on Russian territory.
WW3 in itself seems at first like a dumb idea. Pictures of nuclear war come to mind. I do believe that nuclear war is a highly remote possibility, Russia would win such a war given U.S.'s small size, thermonuclear weapon coverage is guaranteed to exterminate about 200,000 million population during initial exchange. I think this alone removes the possibility of nuclear war. WW3 I think will be fought differently, and I think it will be between Islamic world and the West.
Russia having control over Syria means WW3 will be fought on that yellow land on the map. U.S. gaining control over Syria would push the war onto Russian territory. That's what geopoliticians say.
Thus my main thesis, U.S. is loosing in Syria, and in all other Arab countries, a lot of people in this world watch news.
Western media tried demonizing Russia with hospital bombings in Syria, however once number of bombed hospitals exceeded number of actual hospitals, they lost a lot of credibility.
News came out at 0:17 today, that's around 8 a.m. Eastern U.S. time, so I guess bombing took place a few hours before it, title says during evening prayer. It was in the village of Al Adjina, near Aleppo.
U.S. officials say they were aiming at terrorists near mosque.
Let's depart from the story, because what's done is done, let's talk geopolitics, in particular what is NATO and Russia trying to achieve in Syria.
-Russian objective, control Syria, which gives control to Mediterranean, and much of middle east, the so called "rimland". That way WW3 will ignite bellow Russian territory.
-NATO's objective, control Syria, which gives it control to "rimland", that way WW3 will be fought on Russian territory.
WW3 in itself seems at first like a dumb idea. Pictures of nuclear war come to mind. I do believe that nuclear war is a highly remote possibility, Russia would win such a war given U.S.'s small size, thermonuclear weapon coverage is guaranteed to exterminate about 200,000 million population during initial exchange. I think this alone removes the possibility of nuclear war. WW3 I think will be fought differently, and I think it will be between Islamic world and the West.
Russia having control over Syria means WW3 will be fought on that yellow land on the map. U.S. gaining control over Syria would push the war onto Russian territory. That's what geopoliticians say.
Thus my main thesis, U.S. is loosing in Syria, and in all other Arab countries, a lot of people in this world watch news.
Western media tried demonizing Russia with hospital bombings in Syria, however once number of bombed hospitals exceeded number of actual hospitals, they lost a lot of credibility.