Lay report

[Divorced w 3]

The kids were 10 and 12, my Mom used to leave my sister and I at home on occasion when we were as young or younger. While she may be a Boomer, I wouldn't call her a gutter person. Her jewelry collection alone is probably worth millions.

The term "latchkey kids" exists for a reason. A very common phenomenon for Gen-X kids, and we turned out to be the least insufferable of the current generations.

Im not sure that we, a bunch of divorced, middle aged, perpetually single Gen X’ers, are the best example of how the generation turned out.

 

[Divorced w 3]

I’m commenting on the OP’s original post. You’re commenting apparently on the content of his posting history as a whole. Regardless, why the woman’s choice to maybe leave her 10 and 12 year old at home alone during his date with her has any significance to OP’s lay report I’m still not seeing. I don’t think it reflects on OP’s character at all. We’ll agree to disagree.

Because there was no seduction in what he did for one, as he likely could have skipped all the work if he just played it differently on the initial app convo (would still be nice to see it. Why can’t we see it?)

If it happened, and I’m really starting to doubt that it did, the app convo is where we could really learn a lot and get into some seduction education.

Secondly, to the greater point, men are supposed to be working on improving themselves. A woman who leaves her kids at home and sneaks out for 90 minutes to smash in a car is garbage and if he has a history of this, he’s likely approaching his life the same way.

 

[Barrister]

Because there was no seduction in what he did for one, as he likely could have skipped all the work if he just played it differently on the initial app convo (would still be nice to see it. Why can’t we see it?)

If it happened, and I’m really starting to doubt that it did, the app convo is where we could really learn a lot and get into some seduction education.

Secondly, to the greater point, men are supposed to be working on improving themselves. A woman who leaves her kids at home and sneaks out for 90 minutes to smash in a car is garbage and if he has a history of this, he’s likely approaching his life the same way.

To assume "there was no seduction" or he had zero game to pull the chick is a pretty big jump. That assumes he just showed up and banged this chick because all she wanted was a d1ck - ANY d1ck - and we all know that isn't how it works.

When it comes to the morality stance, you and BackintheGame can die on that hill. It's a weird take in my opinion but we are all entitled to our views. Just not one you're ever going to convince me of: that OP's life is somehow negatively impacted as to whether a woman he smashed got a sitter for her date or how long she was gone for. Give me a break - it was a tinder date for crying out loud. I am done on the topic.

 

[Divorced w 3]

To assume "there was no seduction" or he had zero game to pull the chick is a pretty big jump. That assumes he just showed up and banged this chick because all she wanted was a d1ck - ANY d1ck - and we all know that isn't how it works.

I disagree to a point. There is a difference between meeting someone out for a drink with not a tremendous amount of background, and what happened here. All she wanted was d1ck. There’s no doubt about it. Whether or not that could have happened without the time spent out at the bar, I guess we never know because the chat will not be posted. The first woman I ever successfully closed on tinder was confirmed on chat and I went to her home a day later. There was no drinks necessary as the dialogue on her end was clear how she felt about me early on. So yes, what I am saying is entirely possible and I’d like to see if we could have removed drinks from this equation and gotten to what she was really therefore sooner.

 

[BeExcellent]

It seems this thread has gone in an interesting direction

If someone thinks a woman is a wh*re because I sleep with her on the first date, that's their problem. She had a great time, I had a great time, and in many scenarios, we continue to have great times (the girl from the LR before this most recent one is going to be in Baltimore tomorrow and booked a room for me to visit, for example).

I think it's a bit disappointing how some users have viewed this report...

If he DOESN'T sleep with her on the first date, he did something wrong.

But if she DOES sleep with him on the first date, she did something wrong...and is a wh*re...and OP did nothing right - she was just "easy".

Intimacy is something we all want, so I don't get why achieving that goal requires one to be a "loser", rather than both be "winners".

This is the exact logic flaw that prompted the thread How to Spot a Unicorn more than 10 years ago.

Use the search feature.

Good for you @Rainman4707

 

[Doctor Europeo]

If this is something to criticize, then what do we celebrate?

I have nothing against members celebrating their lays. I personally wouldnt celebrate "pulling" a single mom, but that´s just me. OP found her attractive and got laid, so good for him. At least he is doing better than the Incels.

But if she DOES sleep with him on the first date, she did something wrong...and is a wh*re...and OP did nothing right - she was just "easy".

Op did nothing wrong, but I think a guy in his mid 30s can do much better. Wasnt she "easy", though? If I became single tomorrow and I was desperate for getting some p00zy, take a guess what would be the lowest hangin fruit: Single Moms. Not saying all single Moms are low hangin fruit, one of our best posters was a single mom at some point in her life, but exceptions make the rules.

 

[Rainman4707]

I have nothing against members celebrating their lays. I personally wouldnt celebrate "pulling" a single mom, but that´s just me. OP found her attractive and got laid, so good for him. At least he is doing better than the Incels.



Op did nothing wrong, but I think a guy in his mid 30s can do much better. Wasnt she "easy", though? If I became single tomorrow and I was desperate for getting some p00zy, take a guess what would be the lowest hangin fruit: Single Moms. Not saying all single Moms are low hangin fruit, one of our best posters was a single mom at some point in her life, but exceptions make the rules.

I was'nt going to post it, only reason i did was that i thought inexperienced men might learn something.

 

[Doctor Europeo]

I was'nt going to post it, only reason i did was that i thought inexperienced men might learn something.

Even if inexperienced men didnt learn anything, theres nothing wrong with your thread. It detonated some interesting discussion and its a discussion forum.

 

[Divorced w 3]

I was'nt going to post it, only reason i did was that i thought inexperienced men might learn something.

So why not show the chat and let us see how you got her out?