Why Women Over 40 Suddenly Want Average Men: It's Not What You Think

[Slowhandluke]

There is no reason for females to be submissive nowadays - and I think that I will add "thankfully".

And there is no reason for a man to form a relationship with women (which is currently the trend - a lot of pump and dumps by top men, but few real relationships) AND a lot of young men would add, "thankfully." Young men are actively walking away from relationships.

if there are 10 random women in a room with 10 random guys, if 8 of the women think they are too beautiful, too intelligent, too smart, too educated, "too much woman for the average loser man", etc

If these 8 women think they are too good for the bottom 8 guys... the math isn't "mathing". A lot of these women will not get anyone. I guess if women want to be alone, sure, i guess that's ok, but then they need to stop complaining "where are all the good men?"

Just because a women gets an advance degree in psychology, or gender studies, or whatever doesn't make her better.. just because she wants to climb the corporate ladder working under a male boss, doesn't give her the right to be rude to guys that dont want that.

Guys want submissive, attractive (not hard to be when girls are young) and loyal women. Those are the terms. If its unacceptable then, they can go back to chad...getting their backs blown out, but dont complain if it doesn't work out later.

God made the majority of women attractive younger so they can trap a man. Take away youth and beauty, and its get increasing harder for women to get men to commit to them. Just the way it is.. Without sex/beauty, its a lot easier foe men to just walk away from women. It's just how the sexes are built. Dad's need to tell their average daughters this. Not telling them this harsh truth wil greatly increase her chances of being unhappy in the future. too many dad's give their daughters too high of praise, they ultimately turn into old single women without any SO to live life with.

Dad's need to humble their daughters every now and then by telling them to "make a sandwich".

 

[Manure Spherian]

once you hit +35

If a man is 35+ and still trying to crack the female-attraction code, something went wrong, or he did something wrong.

 

[Bingo-Player]

I don't understand how women, with how Intune they are to men's desires and wants and needs, don't understand that their YOUTH is their currency.

I think they like to kid themselves that as men age they will still be as attracted to the older model ,

Issue for women is as men age the competition from younger women begins to increase massively a 34 year old woman is going to happily settle with a 40 something year old guy

a 40 something year old woman can only really go same age or older

But given the choice most men will take the younger pre menopausal model all day long

The 40 something woman now has to compete with not only women in her own decade but in the one below too

 

[MatureDJ]

If a man is 35+ and still trying to crack the female-attraction code, something went wrong, or he did something wrong.

What if he is short?

 

[Manure Spherian]

What if he is short?

I suppose this counts as something going wrong. However I think heightism and lookism are way overblown!

 

[Solomon]

The video assumes men are stupid.

Women over 40 have no leverage. Heck, over 30 they are crashing and burning. Women over 40 have to attach to some male, almost any average male they can find, because they have no other options. It's like if you are hungry, and don't have the money for good food, you are going to settle for McDonalds.

I don't understand how women, with how Intune they are to men's desires and wants and needs, don't understand that their YOUTH is their currency.

I'll play devils adovacate here I would say most women over 40 have no leverage, if she is attractive and in shape, she will have some, depending on her looks, lifestyle etc. I know some women in their 40s that look better than 20-year-olds. Now, the average woman will have no leverage in regards to getting the guy she wants because most women by 40 are already washed espeically in the midwest where I live.

The ones that are not have mental health issues and/or trauma from being ran through or post-divorce

Many of us ARE

I know some men who are very accomplished I notice two things. Either they are redpill in all aspects of life but not with women and those are the guys that get divorced once or twice, have kids etc. Some wake up after that.

Guy 2. The ones who are redpill but they are few and far in between, obviously.

If a man is over 40 and he is still trying to crack the female attraction code, he did something wrong or something went wrong for him.

The vibe I'm getting is that most men now are seeing female nature for what it truly is due to the exposure on social media espeically in short form content i.e. Tik Tok, Youtube etc but the men that whine the loudest about women's standards or not getting dates are just entitled as the women they complain about i.e. blackpillers, incels etc. I have hung around some Chad's/Tyrones and I never hear them complain about women not in the way most men due. Their complaints are "This girl is to needy she wants a relationship right away"or "I got to many dates lined up this weekend, which girl should I cancel on?" How many guys can truly say they have this problem even on this site?

The truth is, as men, we compete in all aspects of life. The romanticization that men have of the "1950s wife" is gone, and will never come back unless you are a man of means, or you have a woman is super into you, they are not going to be the stay-at-home wife who will give you BJ's whenever she wants. For most men that is not going to be their reality even though they fantasize and pontifcate about it daily on socials.

I do not think there is any reason for educated, attractive female with a good job to be submissive towards uneducated, mildly attractive guy with average job - yet some women still decide to enter such relationships because sex and romance.

I think a lot of guys overestimate their value due to how male ego work - still attractive female wants attractive guy, preferably with assets, but the best is the "full package guy" - and any 6/10 or even 5/10 or less females try to get a shot on such a guy and sometimes it works (who doesn't know a couple where woman is unattractive but the guy is). Women know that it is easy to use sex (and female allure) as a weapon - guys do favours, compliment women, fuel their self-esteem for free every day - notice how much low tier guys compliment models or pretty girls online hoping for any reaction which is somewhat of a beggar's attitude.

There is no reason for females to be submissive nowadays - and I think that I will add "thankfully". When you are father of a daughter you want the best for her - ideal partner, well educated, good earner, handsome, intelligent guy, preferably blue or purple pill. You do not want any PUA or loser around her. If you invested a lot in her, you do not want a simpleton or uneducated guy with no money around her either and this does not change per your personal experience - life is no fairy tale and your family and its future comes first - dreams of young horny guys or middle aged/old guys dreaming about young attractive woman in their bed are irrelevant.

I have an ugly friend - great guy but his face is like 3/10 and dude always looked old. His Tinder still gave him matches with (imho) 4/10 or 5/10 chicks - I asked him why he does not want to date these women - because he doesnt really consider them attractive - he said - I didnt want to be blunt but if I was a woman and I would need to wake up everyday looking at the face of my buddy in bed I would REALLY need to have every other need in relationship in check to accept this fact - so its not that some women do not concede on male attractiveness - tbh almost all of them do because young prince was snatched early by her more attractive girlfriend in college - once you hit +35 as a guy you start to leverage/boost your chances - either by career you have, money you earned or obtained otherwise, car or perhaps house - the love which is only about the other person qualities (looks&personality) happens earlier - when you are 16, 18, perhaps 20 or 21. Later on its more and more about exchange of perspectives for the future and period of 22-28 are "transformation" years for women.

Its not that women are not able to be submissive - there is just much more reasons nowadays for men to be doormats for women rather than for women to be submissive to men (because men do not have the luxury of being weak as they usually do not have the gift of being an attractive woman which for sure is worth a lot in superficial world full of dumb social media around us - simultaneously men gave up values or qualities that made some of their fathers real men - integrity, courage, ability to withstand pain - either physical or emotional - men nowadays are weak and do not understand themselves so how can they understand women).

This is truth, not sure why men refuse to get this, if you want top notch women you gotta be a top notch guy, doesn't mean you have to be rich or something but you gotta have something that make you top notch to her. Blows my mind that men think they shold get a "Sydney Sweeney" cause they are good guys, when I was in my 20s and naive I use to think like this, that's why I did all this simp shyt, getting girls flowers, taking them on dates, reading them poems over the phone (yes I did that in my early 20s) now I don't do 3/4's of that and I have women driving 3-5 hours to see me, rub my back, clean my place then sent home with a wet back and hair unfurled.

I think they like to kid themselves that as men age they will still be as attracted to the older model ,

Issue for women is as men age the competition from younger women begins to increase massively a 34 year old woman is going to happily settle with a 40 something year old guy

a 40 something year old woman can only really go same age or older

But given the choice most men will take the younger pre menopausal model all day long

The 40 something woman now has to compete with not only women in her own decade but in the one below too

I'll play devils advocate again. You see how age-gap relationships talk go viral now the last few years? I have seen older women date younger but typically it's

1. Booty call situation
2. Sugar momma situation
3. Relationship situation

The 3rd situation usually is a mix of 1&2 and the guy decided to settle cause he realizes he can get easy sex from her and a nice play to stay or he doesn't have to work.Belive it or not but there are some men who don't want to work and if a woman is willing to take care of them even if she is not attractive they will, back in the day we use to call them hobosexuals

 

[Slowhandluke]

The truth is, as men, we compete in all aspects of life.

NO. It is better most of the time to cooperate. It is better to join a group and go against that lone man who thinks he has to compete with everyone. Gangs, armies, society.. etc... If I can raise an army to take your wife.... I WILL take your wife especially if that man has no one but himself.

The romanticization that men have of the "1950s wife" is gone, and will never come back unless you are a man of means, or you have a woman is super into you, they are not going to be the stay-at-home wife who will give you BJ's whenever she wants. For most men that is not going to be their reality even though they fantasize and pontifcate about it daily on socials.

25%+ of the world population would disagree with the above statement. Muslims, conservative religious people, etc.. etc.. Men make our reality the way we want it to be. The "1950's wife" existed because men made it that way, and it can come back once the majority of men think that the current situation is unattainable. With the west population decline below replacement, it is unattainable. This "women power" experiment is on its last legs.

This is truth, not sure why men refuse to get this, if you want top notch women you gotta be a top notch guy, doesn't mean you have to be rich or something but you gotta have something that make you top notch to her. Blows my mind that men think they shold get a "Sydney Sweeney" cause they are good guys, when I was in my 20s and naive I use to think like this, that's why I did all this simp shyt, getting girls flowers, taking them on dates, reading them poems over the phone (yes I did that in my early 20s) now I don't do 3/4's of that and I have women driving 3-5 hours to see me, rub my back, clean my place then sent home with a wet back and hair unfurled.

Sydney sweeney is hot, however, in real life there are a lot of attractive women; I see a lot of women who are as hot or hotter, walking downtown where I work. Most average guys are not shooting for the stars. They want attractive women. On average, most young women are attractive. However, an average woman who is attractive due to being young, only wants the top tier. Not all average women (who are attractive only by virtue of being young) can get top tier men. Math doesn't work that way. Hole-flation is real.

Society is changing.. I wouldn't worry about it 'incels" complaining to much. This problem is slowly solving itself. Men aren't that stupid. As nick Fuentales says, "yeah.. hell no, I don't want to get married in this environment.. I guess you can call me an incell". AND THEN WOMEN GET THE PICKACHU FACE... hahahahah. The gig is up....

 

[Solomon]

NO. It is better most of the time to cooperate. It is better to join a group and go against that lone man who thinks he has to compete with everyone. Gangs, armies, society.. etc... If I can raise an army to take your wife.... I WILL take your wife especially if that man has no one but himself.

Even if you're in a group, you're still competing. I got a job in tech with 12 other people in my department (6 men, 6 women). Sure, the other guy's we work together, but at the end of the day make no mistake, you have some other guys who work harder because they want to move up or move to another position. It's naive to think just because you work in the same company and even in the same department, someone wouldn't throw you under the bus to get ahead, cause if they can some men will (I have seen this)

The same is true in a sense in dating, you're not working with other men you're competing, whether you like it or not. That girl you want to go on a date with or want to come to your place, there are most likely other men she is talking too or other men trying to talk to her. I remember early this year a girl came over we hung out and she blew me. Afterwards, when she was ready go home, she was checking her messages and said "I don't get why so many are angry when you don't respond to their messages back right away" I sort of brushed it off, however the reality is that while guys were blowing up her phone, trying to get her attention etc she was blowing me.

Society is changing.. I wouldn't worry about it 'incels" complaining to much. This problem is slowly solving itself. Men aren't that stupid. As nick Fuentales says, "yeah.. hell no, I don't want to get married in this environment.. I guess you can call me an incell". AND THEN WOMEN GET THE PICKACHU FACE... hahahahah. The gig is up....

Nick Fuentes is the incel leader and also suspect being gay, he's said a lot of weird stuff that is just super gay like "Having sex with women is gay' only a gay person would say some dumb shyt like that

 

[Manure Spherian]

NO. It is better most of the time to cooperate. It is better to join a group and go against that lone man who thinks he has to compete with everyone. Gangs, armies, society.. etc... If I can raise an army to take your wife.... I WILL take your wife especially if that man has no one but himself.

Enforced monogamy greatly improved cooperation amongst men. We don’t have that anymore and seducers don’t want that, along with family involvement in courtship, because it is incongruent with seduction and gaming.

Seducers shouldn’t complain about female behavior or feminism, as it it is feminism which allows seduction.

 

[Slowhandluke]

Even if you're in a group, you're still competing. I got a job in tech with 12 other people in my department (6 men, 6 women). Sure, the other guy's we work together, but at the end of the day make no mistake, you have some other guys who work harder because they want to move up or move to another position. It's naive to think just because you work in the same company and even in the same department, someone wouldn't throw you under the bus to get ahead, cause if they can some men will (I have seen this)

It's the crab in the bucket mentality that hold people back; that hold groups of people back. Ghenis Khan was able to rule the world because "his group" competed more against the enemy, then within. Those that lied, backstabbed, etc.. etc.. in Khan's army, was severely punished. Some put to death. Khan defeated a lot of other armies because those armies where competing, not only against Khan, but within themselves. Those that betrayed the leaders that Khan was fighting against were not rewarded, but usually killed after the conflict. Khan despised traitors.

People say one of the reasons we aren't not talking German right now, was because Hitlers commanders were infighting for power and influence.

There is nothing wrong for a more intelligent, more dedicated worker to climb the leader. Khan's army was a meritocracy. Not everyone wants to work 80hrs a week. Not everyone wants to be working over the holidays, etc.. etc.. All toxic work environments will fail. It's in one's best interest not to work in those environments, and luckily for me, the majority of my working career, I haven't. I haven't been thrown under the bus, and I haven't thrown anyone under the buses in my career.

The same is true in a sense in dating, you're not working with other men you're competing, whether you like it or not. That girl you want to go on a date with or want to come to your place, there are most likely other men she is talking too or other men trying to talk to her. I remember early this year a girl came over we hung out and she blew me. Afterwards, when she was ready go home, she was checking her messages and said "I don't get why so many are angry when you don't respond to their messages back right away" I sort of brushed it off, however the reality is that while guys were blowing up her phone, trying to get her attention etc she was blowing me.

I think now a days, guys are not competing for women who casually blow other guys... (surveys says dating is not popular). Women need to change and guys need to force them.. or at least, "lead them" to change. It will happen.

Nick Fuentes is the incel leader and also suspect being gay, he's said a lot of weird stuff that is just super gay like "Having sex with women is gay' only a gay person would say some dumb shyt like that

Yes, but yet a lot of young men are listening to Nick and taking his advice.

 

[BaronOfHair]

I know some men who are very accomplished I notice two things. Either they are redpill in all aspects of life but not with women and those are the guys that get divorced once or twice, have kids etc. Some wake up after that.

Guy 2. The ones who are redpill but they are few and far in between, obviously.

It's perplexing so many of us pretend to know what the hell "Red Pill" and the rest of that claptrap(The Manosphere's created it's own version of

)means anymore. In any event though, I believe I understand what you're saying:

Endeavors like building a multi-billlion dollar corporation often require that one revolve their entire existence around one very narrow goal, thus such individuals end up extremely accomplished in something like tech, but woefully ignorant in every other area of life


"...but the men that whine the loudest about women's standards or not getting dates are just entitled as the women they complain about i.e. blackpillers, incels etc"

It's been my observation that such fellas do that not just about women, but damned near EVERYTHING. And they're highly resistant to anyone pointing out that, for all of the problems with "The System", their mindset and life philosophy have undercut their chances for success, in ways Feminists have never been capable of

 

[MatureDJ]

Nick Fuentes is the incel leader and also suspect being gay, he's said a lot of weird stuff that is just super gay like "Having sex with women is gay' only a gay person would say some dumb shyt like that

Although the Nazis were homophobic on the surface, a lot of them were homos.

 

[Solomon]

I think now a days, guys are not competing for women who casually blow other guys... (surveys says dating is not popular). Women need to change and guys need to force them.. or at least, "lead them" to change. It will happen.

If a man is looking for a woman, whether in the wild or a dating app he's competing, whether he's aware of it or not. It's not competition in the sense that you know your opponent personally, nor should you as a man let it bother you, but the reality is if men weren't competing, this site wouldn't exist because then we all would have the girl (or girls) we would want of our dreams, and society would be at peace but that's not the case. You live your life, do your best, if you meet a cool girl, great, if no,t keep going

Although the Nazis were homophobic on the surface, a lot of them were homos.

Not shocking, I've been paying attention to the "Gryoper" movement, they love gay jokes, and there seems to be a lot of brown and black men to,o which screams like cognitive dissonance to gain white acceptance,e which i find odd.

 

[MatureDJ]

The only guys getting lots of attention on dating apps are the top 10-20% and this includes older women. Older women have even higher expectations than younger women as they often carry a lot more baggage.

It's OVER for Sub80-90%Cels.

 

[Slowhandluke]

If a man is looking for a woman, whether in the wild or a dating app he's competing, whether he's aware of it or not. It's not competition in the sense that you know your opponent personally, nor should you as a man let it bother you, but the reality is if men weren't competing, this site wouldn't exist because then we all would have the girl (or girls) we would want of our dreams, and society would be at peace but that's not the case. You live your life, do your best, if you meet a cool girl, great, if no,t keep going

its not competing when you are doing your best to look good. At the end of the day, there are basically equal number of women and men. Its not a competition to "get all the women". that's polygamy and western society doesn't work that way. Competition to sleep with the most women? Get an average job, and get escorts and you could easily get your numbers up and exceed the number of most men's; but whats the point?

Competition to get "your dream girl". What does that even mean? the prettiest but the most boring? The most interesting but infertile? your childhood crush? People do have preferences. After a while, between two men who are about "equal", the girl will pick someone because of preferences. Even if you marry your "dream girl", she will get old and ugly. The man who lost to you, will have an opportunity to "win" the next younger generation of "dream girl". if he wins, does that mean you lose because you got an "older model"?

this site exists to help men know how to act and present themselves in a way to make them more attractive to women. It's like a store manager giving fishing equipment and advice to men so they can fish and have a higher chance of catching fish.

This site is not like Shang Tsung of mortal combat who gives combatants equipment, and rules of the game so they can fight each other, with only one winner standing (assumingly getting the girl). There is no one yelling out, "finish him!!!" this is crab in the bucket mentality.

 

[Solomon]

its not competing when you are doing your best to look good. At the end of the day, there are basically equal number of women and men. Its not a competition to "get all the women". that's polygamy and western society doesn't work that way. Competition to sleep with the most women? Get an average job, and get escorts and you could easily get your numbers up and exceed the number of most men's; but whats the point?

Competition to get "your dream girl". What does that even mean? the prettiest but the most boring? The most interesting but infertile? your childhood crush? People do have preferences. After a while, between two men who are about "equal", the girl will pick someone because of preferences. Even if you marry your "dream girl", she will get old and ugly. The man who lost to you, will have an opportunity to "win" the next younger generation of "dream girl". if he wins, does that mean you lose because you got an "older model"?

this site exists to help men know how to act and present themselves in a way to make them more attractive to women. It's like a store manager giving fishing equipment and advice to men so they can fish and have a higher chance of catching fish.

This site is not like Shang Tsung of mortal combat who gives combatants equipment, and rules of the game so they can fight each other, with only one winner standing (assumingly getting the girl). There is no one yelling out, "finish him!!!" this is crab in the bucket mentality.

If we’re not competing, then what is the purpose of “game” at all? This isn’t just opinion; competition is a documented feature of human behavior going back to early human societies. Status, competence, and leadership have always influenced attraction and mating dynamics.

“Game” wouldn’t exist if there were no competition. You don’t have to like my definition; that’s fine. But the underlying point stands. I’ve made my case, and there’s no point in beating a dead horse. Read the hyperlinks to edify yourself

Peace

 

[The Duke]

its not competing when you are doing your best to look good. At the end of the day, there are basically equal number of women and men. Its not a competition to "get all the women". that's polygamy and western society doesn't work that way. Competition to sleep with the most women? Get an average job, and get escorts and you could easily get your numbers up and exceed the number of most men's; but whats the point?

Competition to get "your dream girl". What does that even mean? the prettiest but the most boring? The most interesting but infertile? your childhood crush? People do have preferences. After a while, between two men who are about "equal", the girl will pick someone because of preferences. Even if you marry your "dream girl", she will get old and ugly. The man who lost to you, will have an opportunity to "win" the next younger generation of "dream girl". if he wins, does that mean you lose because you got an "older model"?

this site exists to help men know how to act and present themselves in a way to make them more attractive to women. It's like a store manager giving fishing equipment and advice to men so they can fish and have a higher chance of catching fish.

This site is not like Shang Tsung of mortal combat who gives combatants equipment, and rules of the game so they can fight each other, with only one winner standing (assumingly getting the girl). There is no one yelling out, "finish him!!!" this is crab in the bucket mentality.

When you show up at a singles bar and there are 2 hot girls and 5 guys that approach these 2 girls and try and get a number is that not a form of competition?

The women are judging while the men are competing against each other.

It's why guys amog and insert themselves into male/female interactions.

If it wasn't a competition why do we call it "game"?

It's like candidates interviewing for a job. Individuals are weighed against each other and try out for the number 1 spot? I see this as a competition.

 

[Slowhandluke]

When you show up at a singles bar and there are 2 hot girls and 5 guys that approach these 2 girls and try and get a number is that not a form of competition?

if the men are cool, it is not a form of competition. Just an opportunity to meet new people and to get to know EVERYONE. To have a good time for EVERYONE (both for the men and even the women).

if the men are immature, yes it can be a form of competition. Bad pickup lines. Making the women nervous. Acting slimy cvck blocking, lying, etc.. etc., One can make any situation a form of competition. doesn't mean its the right thing to do. Sometimes I go to a buffet to have a good meal, not to stuff my face and see if I can make the restaurant "lose money". ethics and morals are important.

The women are judging while the men are competing against each other.

It's why guys amog and insert themselves into male/female interactions.

If it wasn't a competition why do we call it "game"?

There are many different types of games - cooperative games and zero sum games. Mate choice isn't a zero sum game. If mating is a zero sum game (you win only of i lose), why do men hate other men that "c0cck block?" why do men (and women) hate it when other people break up relationships? especially if its all "fair in love and war"?

Mate choice is more about finding compatibility. Looking your best and acting in an attractive manner also helps. It's part of the process. One can make finding a mate a zero sum game, but there's a good chance he will lose. it will end up badly for him.

It's like candidates interviewing for a job. Individuals are weighed against each other and try out for the number 1 spot? I see this as a competition.

Interviewing for a job position can be about competition, but its more about job fit. There really isn't a "number 1" spot. its more about if a candidate fits in a position. Can the candidate do the job?

I dont have a doctor's degree... I would never compete for a doctor's position. I'm an engineer. No doctor would compete for my position.

In an interview, you are trying to convince the interviewer you are the best man for that particular job. It's more about "fit" than competing against another person for "number 1 position".

Idk, if people want to compete with other men. Feel free. They will not go far. Forming friends (real friends), forming relationships with other men, etc.. etc.. If you can raise an army, you will always beat that one guy who thinks he needs to compete with everyone. Having a cohesive army will always defeat a bunch of guys who are always back stabbing each other. Ghenis Khan know this and commanded respect from his army and his soldiers while conquering basically all of the know world at the time (or very close). He also basically died in his sleep after a long night of partying with his men at a relatively old age.

 

[The Duke]

if the men are cool, it is not a form of competition. Just an opportunity to meet new people and to get to know EVERYONE. To have a good time for EVERYONE (both for the men and even the women).

if the men are immature, yes it can be a form of competition. Bad pickup lines. Making the women nervous. Acting slimy cvck blocking, lying, etc.. etc., One can make any situation a form of competition. doesn't mean its the right thing to do. Sometimes I go to a buffet to have a good meal, not to stuff my face and see if I can make the restaurant "lose money". ethics and morals are important.



There are many different types of games - cooperative games and zero sum games. Mate choice isn't a zero sum game. If mating is a zero sum game (you win only of i lose), why do men hate other men that "c0cck block?" why do men (and women) hate it when other people break up relationships? especially if its all "fair in love and war"?

Mate choice is more about finding compatibility. Looking your best and acting in an attractive manner also helps. It's part of the process. One can make finding a mate a zero sum game, but there's a good chance he will lose. it will end up badly for him.



Interviewing for a job position can be about competition, but its more about job fit. There really isn't a "number 1" spot. its more about if a candidate fits in a position. Can the candidate do the job?

I dont have a doctor's degree... I would never compete for a doctor's position. I'm an engineer. No doctor would compete for my position.

In an interview, you are trying to convince the interviewer you are the best man for that particular job. It's more about "fit" than competing against another person for "number 1 position".

Idk, if people want to compete with other men. Feel free. They will not go far. Forming friends (real friends), forming relationships with other men, etc.. etc.. If you can raise an army, you will always beat that one guy who thinks he needs to compete with everyone. Having a cohesive army will always defeat a bunch of guys who are always back stabbing each other. Ghenis Khan know this and commanded respect from his army and his soldiers while conquering basically all of the know world at the time (or very close). He also basically died in his sleep after a long night of partying with his men at a relatively old age.

good explanation, I can see where you are coming from.

 

[HaleyBaron]

attracted to women 18 to 25.

Not speaking to pedophilia, but biology prefers women far younger than 18. In fact, the peak is somewhere around 14 and 15. 18 is just a minimum number the state cooked up for the laws and to match with grade school graduation. Has nothing to do with science.