Laughable. They cannot say it is safe in the long-term when it hasn't even been on the market for a year.
The article seems to gloss over the fact that a) it's a novel mRNA vaccine based on new biotechnology and b) the government is pushing for "boosters" which will increase the odds of negative side effects every time its taken, even if its true that it "wears off" after 2 months.
Their entire argument is "there is no data yet that its harmful in the long-term, therefore it must be okay" (while also hand waiving away the tens of thousands of deaths and illness and other reported adverse effects).
What a joke. We said the same thing about cigarrettes, asbestos, lead pipes, vegetable oils, and countless other examples, because the medical industry is entirely profit driven, and governmental authorities are corrupt and incompetent.
On another note, anytime a non-scientfic article says "experts say" it's probably a load of ****, argument from authority and interpreting findings to suit their narrative.