AttackFormation
Master Don Juan
I give up.
We'll see what happens in the 2020 election.
We'll see what happens in the 2020 election.
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
Dont give up, i like poking holes in the leftist narrative.... We can do this all day all week until the mods shut it down....I give up. And if Sanders doesn't win in 2020, I would be tempted to give up on America too.
I have shown you history, not a "leftist narrative". You are in your own delusion man.Dont give up, i like poking holes in the leftist narrative.... We can do this all day all week until the mods shut it down....
But the history you presented highlights my point:I have shown you history, not a "leftist narrative". You are in your own delusion man.
Battle of the Billionaires 2020!We'll see what happens in the 2020 election.
Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.
Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?
You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.
Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.
It does beg the question of why they bother to pretend to have an election, when they just appoint a candidate if they don't like the people's choice.The democratic party seems to subscribe to the belief of the Tyranny of 51%....otherwise they wouldn't have implemented the super delegate system....which is basically the EC-Lite....
There is a new book out about George Washington. The author mentions that he was always getting mad at his slaves for not taking pride in their work. It was like he was too dense to understand that they didn't want to be there.The EC wasn't the forum where the coalition was built, nor where the dialogue was conducted, and the "compromises" that the EC has induced have been on morality for the worse - just as its slavedriving founders intended. The mere fact that they founded and used it to sponsor immorality disproves your notion that you can "discount" the gross immorality that the EC presided over in favor of some ephemeral and arbitrary "principle" which conveniently aligns with your political aspirations. If it really did what you claim it does, then immoral people wouldn't have founded it or been able to use it for immoral purposes.
Your second point is just a replay of your initial go to soundbite that I've used history and philosophy to get you to reconsider, I won't repeat it.
The DNC are hypocrites that change their stance based on what suits them..... They want a popular vote to decide the General Election, but within their own party they want an EC-Lite system to prevent the tyranny of the majority....the majority being a bunch of blue-haired socialists led by millionaire Bernie who owns three houses....hypocrisy...It does beg the question of why they bother to pretend to have an election, when they just appoint a candidate if they don't like the people's choice.
Didn’t Trump get caught committing treason again yesterday?The DNC are hypocrites that change their stance based on what suits them..... They want a popular vote to decide the General Election, but within their own party they want an EC-Lite system to prevent the tyranny of the majority....the majority being a bunch of blue-haired socialists led by millionaire Bernie who owns three houses....hypocrisy...
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
Bear in mind at at the inception of the EC that Blacks and women could not vote, therefore to suggest that the EC was implement to suppress Black and female votes is a mis-characterization....The EC wasn't the forum where the coalition was built, nor where the dialogue was conducted, and the "compromises" that the EC has induced have been on morality for the worse - just as its slavedriving founders intended. The mere fact that they founded and used it to sponsor immorality disproves your notion that you can "discount" the gross immorality that the EC presided over in favor of some ephemeral and arbitrary "principle", which conveniently aligns with your political aspirations. If it really did what you claim it does, then immoral people wouldn't have been able to use or found it for intentionally immoral purposes.
The evidence is that it's moral philosophy, not the political system itself which ultimately determines the outcome, and that preventing a "tyranny of the majority" by instituting a "tyranny of the minority" is a gravely flawed willful ignorance.
Your second point is just a replay of your initial go to soundbite that I've used history and philosophy to get you to reconsider, I won't repeat it.
Let me catch up on my news cycle and get back to you once I've reviewed the facts.... I dont jump to conclusion just because I like or dislike someone....you should try to do the same....Didn’t Trump get caught committing treason again yesterday?
Let me catch up on my news cycle and get back to you once I've reviewed the facts.... I dont jump to conclusion just because I like or dislike someone....you should try to do the same....
The evil that the human mind can conduct and justify or detach from is surreal...There is a new book out about George Washington. The author mentions that he was always getting mad at his slaves for not taking pride in their work. It was like he was too dense to understand that they didn't want to be there.

You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
A wise man doesnt rely on only one source for his news....as news outlets have their own narratives to advance.... I'll be reviewing from several sources to cross check, until that time I reserve judgement....![]()
Trump decided to replace his top spy chief after his aide told Congress that Russia is interfering in 2020 to help Trump win
Trump was led to falsely believe that Rep. Adam Schiff was fed exclusive information that could help Democrats if released publicly.www.businessinsider.com
You good with Trump enlisting Russia to cheat again?
There is no kind of left wing voter you'll consider as legitimate. If they're not rich then it's "the politics of envy". If they're not poor then it's "champagne socialism". Neither the circumstances nor the logical conclusion of that stance matters to you. Bonus for being a mindless "SJW", or maybe someone who "wants people to be dependent on the state" if they're concerned about any kind of social issue.The DNC are hypocrites that change their stance based on what suits them..... They want a popular vote to decide the General Election, but within their own party they want an EC-Lite system to prevent the tyranny of the majority....the majority being a bunch of blue-haired socialists led by millionaire Bernie who owns three houses....hypocrisy...
I never said it was implemented for that reason in the first place.Bear in mind at at the inception of the EC that Blacks and women could not vote, therefore to suggest that the EC was implement to suppress Black and female votes is a mis-characterization....
A wise man doesnt rely on only one source for his news....as news outlets have their own narratives to advance.... I'll be reviewing from several sources to cross check, until that time I reserve judgement....
Please don't assume my voting history....I voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012....There is no kind of left wing voter you'll consider as legitimate. If they're not rich then it's "the politics of envy". If they're not poor then it's "champagne socialism". Neither the circumstances nor the logical conclusion of that stance matters to you. Bonus for being a mindless "SJW", or maybe someone who "wants people to be dependent on the state" if they're concerned about any kind of social issue.
Why did you only list news outlets that are known to be hostile towards Trump? All those news outlets have consistently run negative Opinion Pieces on Trump therefore their objectivity is called into question.... Cant you include a news outlet that only reports facts divorced from their feelings about Trump?![]()
Trump angry after House briefed on Russia meddling in 2020 election on his behalf
The briefing cost the acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire, a shot at the permanent DNI job, current and former officials said.www.nbcnews.com
![]()
Russia is looking to help Trump win in 2020, election security official told lawmakers
The intelligence community's top election security official delivered a briefing to lawmakers last week warning them that the intelligence community believes Russia is already taking steps to interfere in the 2020 election with the goal of helping President Donald Trump win, three sources...www.cnn.com
![]()
Trump denies Russians are meddling to help him win 2020 election
Donald Trump on denied reports from US intelligence officials that Russia was meddling in the 2020 election to help him win.nypost.com
![]()
Lawmakers Are Warned That Russia Is Meddling to Re-elect Trump (Published 2020)
A classified briefing to House members is said to have angered the president, who complained that Democrats would “weaponize” the disclosure.www.nytimes.com
You good with getting foreign help to cheat in the election? You endorse cheating? How about treason?
Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.
You've been "getting ready" for two years.
She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.
Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.