I've been here on the forum since 2012 after my first breakup, and I'd say I know the philosophy of DJ pretty well, but sometimes I wonder if your just doing yourself a disservice by being TOO strict with these "rules". Women want you to chase her, because it makes them feel important and wanted, and this does NOT mean that she thinks you're an AFC by doing that, IF you still have your own values and make rules. That way women are even more attracted to guys who are willing to fight for them even for a little bit.
Maybe maybe not.
Grown men do grown men things. DJ is fine. Its not even about DJer, miscer, pua, or whatever. Its absolutely about execution.
There's nothing I can do with flaking but bury her. Not literally but subjectively. Bish is dead to me. I wont mourn her loss. I will go get more baeeeees on top form SMV.
#YOLO!
So I think while it's good to not tolerate her flaking or something else that she might do, it's better to tell her what you think of it and that way you still have the control of the situation AND have potentially even more attracted girl in your hands. She wants you to keep her in her place and make the rules. That's the fighting part. But if you'd to just "next her" or go NC till she gets back to you there's higher possibility that she loses her interest and attraction which WAS there, until she felt that you don't even care about her by being too indifferent.
You could be 100% correct but zero ****kkks given.
I run a tight ship. I lead. She follows or next.
No exceptions.
You don't excuse bad behaviour.
A real OG from rsdnation had a saying, "i don't chase. I replace."
She drew blood. You excuse it?
There's a guy on rmg. He was in the army and his gf cucked him.
He responded with marrying her and having children with her. Likely, not his.
Everyone is pedaling their b/s. Pick your poison. If i were to guess, she jumped off the bigger, better prizes ****.
If you hear from her, its after the carousel.
This is better approach, although you'd still make it unnecessarily hard by going NC for 2 weeks. I know that this way of going by this saves you from being desperate and, even worse, having a oneitis, but this way of going by also misses out on many potential candidates for a future LTR. If you're planning to be single and not even entertaining the thought of having a LTR, then this kind of approach is the best in my opinion. Now that I think of it, which makes her feel more that you're sulking, by not talking to her for 2 weeks and then pinging her asking what's up, or by just simply telling her what you think of her flaking and setting the rules like a man, follow them or have a nice life..? To me it feels like the latter would be the way to go.
I don't give a flying ****.
The prerequisite is feminine, submissive, dtf.
Top form SMV 18-23 baeeeees or gtfo.
Any ****ery is grounds for disregard. Please, gimme a excuse to go get more.
Maybe the word "chasing" is wrong. The better word for it would be "caring". Caring for her by telling her what she did wrong makes her feel that she's not just a toy to you and are willing to make things work if she obeys and this makes HER want YOU. I mean, why would she want someone who doesn't even care to tell why he's ignoring her? How could she build her attraction to someone who's not there? And in this situation the girl is just a 18 yr old, I bet she doesn't even recognize what she did wrong.
You can't be half a gangster.
You're begging to get cucked.
This is an honest thought which I've been struggling to figure out, because I've seen so many situations where the guy hasn't given up so easily and that has worked out well. Remembering that a man who fights for his woman is not an AFC, if he doesn't do it desperately and is willing to walk away at anytime. And believe you me, I'm not the type of guy(anymore) to cry for a girl, because I very well know that there's loads of fish in the ocean.
Worked out well, how? Like tanner marrying a hoe who cucked him?
Rollo, the godfather of red pill marrying the epiphany phase?
What are men competing for? There's a sacrificial element to Being as such by default. The idealism for being a husband, a father, and having a family once held value.
It is a relic of once upon a time along with masculinity for the most part.
Ask yourself, would a man in the 50s tolerate this behaviour? How about a Muslim under Islam living in a mud hutt with unhygienic toe nails?
Its unacceptable. She played her card. Next her.
Kill the boy, end your miserable blue pill ideal before divorce rape finds you.
There is no quality women. There's only women. Female nature is hypergamy on steroids. Its just about optimisation or lack thereof. If you are to play game, both parties must be present.
Anyway, we both know what you are doing. I'll quit now and direct my energies to something more useful while you consider what frame you are following.