Ronaldo7
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 802
- Reaction score
- 177
After establishing the oh-so-obvious affirmation regarding women being confusing specimens, it is up to the man to delve into innovation to bypass the contradictory phrases uttered by women.
Whether it is encountering a woman, who proclaims to have a boyfriend but explicitly tells you that she would be willing to go out with you, only to get cold feet after the initial interaction. All signs seem positive. She gave you her number, she constantly smiled and even stated that her having a boyfriend was not a hindrance.
What does one do here? Of course, one must evaluate actions first and foremost. However, one can point to those signs as the cornerstone of a positive rendezvous.
The aforementioned example illustrates the bothersome dilemma of being subjected to a game of Russian roulette with some women. This is not an apology to exemplify dejection. I like to understand the phenomena around me. I apply Socrates' elenctic method to those things, which i need to seek the truth from. I find myself in a standstill with women. As much as i try to undertake their reasoning, using Descartes as a philosophical guideline, i find myself with more redundant questions than answers.
And here i am. How do you innovate the incomprehensible? How do you innovate the unsaid? Do you base it on your interpretation or on the revolving changes around you?
I feel the need to understand my weaknesses. I must conceptualize my failures, so that i can recreate the blueprint to grasp success at the next opportunity.
I also realize that the connotation you give to occurrences will dictate the outcome of it. Depending on how one recovers from a failed attempt, one can conserve said prospect as a friend or acquaintance to further grow one's social proof.
Having said all of the above, i firmly believe and stand by Michael Jordan's quote. "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take".
I will keep attempting the shots, albeit with more profound knowledge and background of every attempt.
Whether it is encountering a woman, who proclaims to have a boyfriend but explicitly tells you that she would be willing to go out with you, only to get cold feet after the initial interaction. All signs seem positive. She gave you her number, she constantly smiled and even stated that her having a boyfriend was not a hindrance.
What does one do here? Of course, one must evaluate actions first and foremost. However, one can point to those signs as the cornerstone of a positive rendezvous.
The aforementioned example illustrates the bothersome dilemma of being subjected to a game of Russian roulette with some women. This is not an apology to exemplify dejection. I like to understand the phenomena around me. I apply Socrates' elenctic method to those things, which i need to seek the truth from. I find myself in a standstill with women. As much as i try to undertake their reasoning, using Descartes as a philosophical guideline, i find myself with more redundant questions than answers.
And here i am. How do you innovate the incomprehensible? How do you innovate the unsaid? Do you base it on your interpretation or on the revolving changes around you?
I feel the need to understand my weaknesses. I must conceptualize my failures, so that i can recreate the blueprint to grasp success at the next opportunity.
I also realize that the connotation you give to occurrences will dictate the outcome of it. Depending on how one recovers from a failed attempt, one can conserve said prospect as a friend or acquaintance to further grow one's social proof.
Having said all of the above, i firmly believe and stand by Michael Jordan's quote. "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take".
I will keep attempting the shots, albeit with more profound knowledge and background of every attempt.