Luke Skywalker
Banned
- Joined
- May 23, 2006
- Messages
- 2,436
- Reaction score
- 11
Ok stand, you have my attention, I'm reviewing all your frigging threads from the time you joined this site and your posts to see if anything clicks with me.
Firstly, I'm a skeptic and believe that your success is based on looks or some genetic thing where you are getting strong IOI's or women that are very receptive and open to you. If this is the case, this would sort of make you a natural -- my question would be why are you here then if you are just posting about easy conquests from women who just virtually throwing themselves at you?
Anyone here can be successful if women are thowing themselves at them unless:
1) for religious reasons they don't want to have sex with her.
2) they don't like the woman enough to have sex with her.
3) not hetrosexual.
But even if the above three are true, sure it's an ego-boost, but you really have to post this stuff to brag about your easy conquests on here?
However, I do notice a pattern that I can connect with.
You appear to be confident and assume interest.
For example, I would be too hesitant to mention the word "fun". It's not even in my vocabulary, but you seem to be recklessly using that word in interactions. So, maybe I should start learning some of this vocabulary such as 'hanging-out', 'chilling' and 'fun' and start playing around with it, if I were serious about this. I'm confused on this part since it seems you put 'confident vocabulary diction', but I still think you have high interest levels to start out with on receptive girls.
Firstly, I'm a skeptic and believe that your success is based on looks or some genetic thing where you are getting strong IOI's or women that are very receptive and open to you. If this is the case, this would sort of make you a natural -- my question would be why are you here then if you are just posting about easy conquests from women who just virtually throwing themselves at you?
Anyone here can be successful if women are thowing themselves at them unless:
1) for religious reasons they don't want to have sex with her.
2) they don't like the woman enough to have sex with her.
3) not hetrosexual.
But even if the above three are true, sure it's an ego-boost, but you really have to post this stuff to brag about your easy conquests on here?
However, I do notice a pattern that I can connect with.
You appear to be confident and assume interest.
For example, I would be too hesitant to mention the word "fun". It's not even in my vocabulary, but you seem to be recklessly using that word in interactions. So, maybe I should start learning some of this vocabulary such as 'hanging-out', 'chilling' and 'fun' and start playing around with it, if I were serious about this. I'm confused on this part since it seems you put 'confident vocabulary diction', but I still think you have high interest levels to start out with on receptive girls.