Your thoughts on the latest abortion ruling

[eli77]

If this is considered a political post please take it down but that's not my intention I just want to get a guy's point of view on this subject.

 

[corrector]

Its great! It means that the chads/chadlites will get less action and average / above average guys who want an LTR, marriage, or start a nuclear family, will have a better chance rather than dealing with someone's notch. Now women have less of a free-ride to be wild and promiscuous with the chads and c0ck carosels of OLD and the days of that being AS cheap are over. The next thing would have to be birth control and contraceptives. When that happens, allot of women would just give up on tinder and sober up and settle with their looksmatches.

 

[Epicwinguy]

It ****ing sucks. I’m finally getting action and now casual sex is on its way to being criminalized practically.

 

[FlexpertHamilton]

I am pro baby killing, and pro eugenics, since natural selection in humans no longer exists. But, I am largely against easy access to abortion because it turns women into hypergamous sluts with no accountability for their actions. They already have enough reproductive/domestic power as it is.

By in large though, I don't actually give a ****.

 

[Konada]

It won't do much. People can just fly over to legsl states to get an abortion. We should see more black market services as well, resulting in casualties. (But if you are dumb enough to get black market services, you are better off dead anyway)

Not to mention wealthy people, its still easy to pay them off to get an abortion

 

[Sgthaytham]

It ****ing sucks. I’m finally getting action and now casual sex is on its way to being criminalized practically.

Condoms?

 

[DarwinTaurus]

I'm not going to give an opinion in regards to Abortion, as it is such a hot topic, however, from the viewpoint of LEGALISM, the Ruling is correct, on a Constitutional basis. It is a matter for the States.

 

[Epicwinguy]

Condoms?

Those might also get banned thanks to those cuckservatives

 

[SW15]

The issue of the Supreme Court and abortion access doesn't have that much impact on the lives of most seducers at a micro level.

A good portion of seducers are using condoms and many times using condoms with women who are using birth control. That's going to eliminate the majority of the probability of an incident.

Additionally, if your target market is women age 25+, childless, and with a BA/BS or degree or higher, she's not going to have an abortion if she gets pregnant. I've known men who have gotten childless, college educated women pregnant in the 25-32 age range in unstable situations. In every single one of these instances, the woman kept the child despite the less than favorable circumstances surrounding the pregnancy. Her political ideology had zero impact upon her personal choice.

In most cases, when a man impregnates a woman, things seem stable in that moment. If this happens within the context of a marriage, it is in the early years of a marriage. However, things end to go downhill even in strong relationships once children enter the equation. Having children is a big risk. It's more likely than not that you won't be in a romantic relationship with the mother by the time your first kid with her turns 18.

Divorce stinks, both from a financial and emotional standpoint. I've known men who have gone through childless divorces and the consequences were not good. Divorces involving children under 18 in the household are worse.

The best solution to this is to use condoms every time. Additionally, try to screen for women who use birth control. The combination of a man using condoms and a woman using birth control is highly likely to result in sterile sex. Getting a woman comfortable enough with you to disclose her birth control status will reduce your number of first dates resulting in sex and same night lays from the bar. You'll only have to wait 2-3 dates more typically.

It's a little bit more risky to ejaculate inside a condom when the woman isn't using birth control. I've done that with some women and not gotten them pregnant.

 

[Bible_Belt]

There are medical conditions that make pregnancy a death sentence for some women. But those b!tches can just fvckin die...say the pro life people.

 

[Xenom0rph]

Political theater.

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

The problem at hand is that many don’t understand what just happened or the political system.

SCOTUS did not outlaw abortion, it gave the power to the States, where it always should have been to begin with. Each state, has legislative bodies that are representative of their constituents- they were duly elected to office to make laws for the state they are in. They hold the power to pass laws that are representing the will of the people. If you live in a state that doesn’t represent your views change your elected officials. Or move.

This isn’t about abortion rights it’s about states’ rights, just like gun control.

There are medical conditions that make pregnancy a death sentence for some women. But those b!tches can just fvckin die...say the pro life people.

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

I’m going on OLD and my profile will have a picture of the medical record proving I had a vasectomy.

Its great! It means that the chads/chadlites will get less action and average / above average guys who want an LTR, marriage, or start a nuclear family, will have a better chance rather than dealing with someone's notch. Now women have less of a free-ride to be wild and promiscuous with the chads and c0ck carosels of OLD and the days of that being AS cheap are over. The next thing would have to be birth control and contraceptives. When that happens, allot of women would just give up on tinder and sober up and settle with their looksmatches.

 

[Bible_Belt]

This isn’t about abortion rights it’s about states’ rights, just like gun control.

If you let Alabama have their way, there will be signs on white owned businesses that say:

NO N1GGERS
NO FAGG0TS
NO JEWS

So those people should just move, right? Stop living there if they don't like it.

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

States rights brother it’s a real thing, just like the right to keep and bear and smoke pot.

Dont like it? Change the law, or change zip codes.

States' rights give individual states the right to pass and enforce laws and operate independently of and with minimal interference by the federal government. This means each state has the right and the power to operate independently from the federal government as long there is no violation of the U.S. Constitution.

it’s the law of the land guaranteed to you by the Constitution.

If you let Alabama have their way, there will be signs on white owned businesses that say:

NO N1GGERS
NO FAGG0TS
NO JEWS

So those people should just move, right? Stop living there if they don't like it.

 

[Bible_Belt]

States rights brother it’s a real thing,

But then why have a federal government at all? The first attempt at this country was a confederacy, and it failed because the states couldn't get along and no one could make them do anything.

 

[jimwho]

Those might also get banned thanks to those cuckservatives

And this dumpster comment is why we can't have discussions.

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

The federal government has the power to coin money, to regulate commerce, to declare war, to raise and maintain armed forces, and to establish a Post Office. That’s it.

Read the Constitution, the Federalist Papers…

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

I don't recall anywhere that stated the fed government could delegate those responsibilities to other entities such as the fed reserve. Meaning they've been breaking the law for over 100 years. I could be wrong though.

Federal Reserve Act of 1913. It’s not federal and it’s not a reserve, but it’s law. Unfortunately as long as they can just add zeroes it’s going to continue, too much money in politics. Our countries’ ability to do what we do is because petroleum is priced in US dollars, countries have to buy USD to buy petroleum it’s the whole reason we went after Sadam in 1991 he wanted to create a new exchange based in gold.

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

But is it any different then them trying to pass an illegal firearm law? They try passing illegal laws all the time.

By “they” I assume you mean the us congress?