The sex ratio at birth is slanted towards males in humans by default, as there are more male foetuses conceived and born to full term than female offspring. Male immigranttion and male migration within a country may also directly increase the surplus of males.
This near-universal male preference for younger women would be expected to lead to greater competition among men for the relatively scarce young, fecund women in a particular population.
Research into the effects of OSR on mating behavior indicate that the effects of an imbalanced sex ratio are chiefly exerted via an imbalanced OSR serving to make the rarer sex in a particular environment either more choosy in terms of partner choice (with the more plentiful sex more prone to compromise in terms of standards) or more prone and capable of executing their favoured sexual strategies (argued to be uncommitted sex for males and relationships with men of high mate value for women, in line with parental investment theory).
Population aging and declining birth rates in many industrialised countries would be further expected to exacerbate this phenomenon, as this aging results in much fewer fertile age women as a portion of the population at large.
Every single woman on this planet, even if she's married, is actually available (for the right man). Such are the laws and structure of our woke world now. Take advantage of it!
Every single woman on this planet, even if she's married, is actually available (for the right man). Such are the laws and structure of our woke world now. Take advantage of it!
Agree with this mostly. Your right except for in places where men are allowed to beat their women without consequences. Or better yet, where marital infidelity is a crime punishable by death.. Prolly not so many “choices” for those married women.
Warning!
Do not subscribe to The SoSuave Newsletter unless you are already a chick magnet!
The information in each issue of The SoSuave Newsletter is too powerful for most guys to handle. If you are an ordinary guy, it is not for you. It is meant for the elite few. Not the unwashed masses.
If you know you can handle it...
If you already have girls calling you at all hours of the day and night, showing up at your door, throwing themselves at you everywhere you go...
Then sign up below.
But if you're just an average Joe, an ordinary guy, no one special – then skip this. It is not for you.
Agree with this mostly. Your right except for in places where men are allowed to beat their women without consequences. Or better yet, where marital infidelity is a crime punishable by death.. Prolly not so many “choices” for those married women.
No fault divorce. A woman can leave her husband any time she finds a d1ck she prefers. And nothing the Chumpsband can do about it. In fact, he will even have to pay her. Modern marriage is such a punking it's beyond belief.
Every single woman on this planet, even if she's married, is actually available (for the right man). Such are the laws and structure of our woke world now. Take advantage of it!
Biology will always trump ideology. Every woman has a different value at every given time point. Women care about securing resources. Playing alpha only demonstrates one set of resources.
Most may disagree, but in my opinion, the best women are the ones with low partner counts who have the ability and desire to keep her man and not play the field. May be rarer these days, but they do exist.
Thinking every woman is available is not the best strategy. Being selective is a better strategy. Gossip is biology. Women depend on gossip as part of their vetting strategy. Flaunt your player strategy too much and it could hurt your chances with the best girls.
Best that the women never see you coming, ie your actual intent.
An interactive map of where to find single men and women across America. NYC has 150,000 more single women, LA has 90,000 extra unmarried men. Pack your bags!
jonathansoma.com
The data set that @Zimbabwe referred to was last updated in 2012. The sources that Soma used to put together his maps still update. It's possible for any of us, if we are good enough with data manipulations, to update maps with more recent data.
It showed that the USA is essentially a sausage fest for men under the age of 40 in most metro areas. It's unlikely that has changed much since 2012. It might have even gotten worse.
There is so much black pill on this forum. Single men outnumber single women because the bvtches with children, relationships, and marriages are sharing men. It is basic math. It has been this way since the beginning of time.
I doubt NY city has more male singles than female singles. Also, 63 more men than women per 1000 people is really a small number. That is less than a percent more. That's almost a rounding error. After all, it takes just a few women to say they are "single" even if the males they are dating is saying they arent to sway the results.
I doubt NY city has more male singles than female singles. Also, 63 more men than women per 1000 people is really a small number. That is less than a percent more. That's almost a rounding error. After all, it takes just a few women to saw they are single even if the males they are dating is saying they arent.
Lived in NYC for years, yes sir it does. NYC's glory days are behind it. As soon as some idiot back in 2011 let the cat out the bag about how NYC is a land of single women, every brogrammer from San Fran flooded in and bars became sausagefests. Plus tech companies also flooded into the city. I'd estimate that NYC is flooding with single men now and single women are a commodity, just like in any other major US city.
Lived in NYC for years, yes sir it does. NYC's glory days are behind it. As soon as some idiot back in 2011 let the cat out the bag about how NYC is a land of single women, every brogrammer from San Fran flooded in and bars became sausagefests. Plus tech companies also flooded into the city. I'd estimate that NYC is flooding with single men now and single women are a commodity, just like in any other major US city.
At the end of the day, the ratio is pretty even. If one guy dates one girl, most guys will have a partner. If a chad dates multiple women, then there will be men without partners. It's just basic math...
Put away your credit card.
You can now read our detailed guide to women and dating for free - Right Here!
At the end of the day, the ratio is pretty even. If one guy dates one girl, most guys will have a partner. If a chad dates multiple women, then there will be men without partners. It's just basic math...
“One Woman for One Man” was the old social contract. It stabilised society. But the alphas hated it because it was harder to gain access to multiple women who were protected by strong fathers and a society that valued monogamy. So Alphas invented feminism and the rest is history.
Lived in NYC for years, yes sir it does. NYC's glory days are behind it. As soon as some idiot back in 2011 let the cat out the bag about how NYC is a land of single women, every brogrammer from San Fran flooded in and bars became sausagefests. Plus tech companies also flooded into the city. I'd estimate that NYC is flooding with single men now and single women are a commodity, just like in any other major US city.
The wild thing is that New York City had a surplus of single 20s-30s males relative to single 20s-30s females in 2011. A lot of brogrammers made a decision based upon a faulty interpretation of data. NYC’s male surplus isn’t as bad as San Francisco’s. Mostly every metro West of the Mississippi River has a horrid male surplus.
I doubt NY city has more male singles than female singles. Also, 63 more men than women per 1000 people is really a small number. That is less than a percent more. That's almost a rounding error. After all, it takes just a few women to say they are "single" even if the males they are dating is saying they arent to sway the results.
In NYC there's more women than men almost everywhere I've ever been. Especially in Queens.
I've seen statistics that say there's way more women than men, but there's less single women than single men. And the majority of the surplus of women are old like 40+
You make a good point on the numbers. I was thinking about how we only need 1-5 girls at a time each. So even if there's only 10,000 single women in your city, that's a lifetime supply for you as an individual.
Even if it's something crazy like 9 in 10 girls have boyfriends, you can go to places where young singles would be and only talk to receptive girls with no men around.
An interactive map of where to find single men and women across America. NYC has 150,000 more single women, LA has 90,000 extra unmarried men. Pack your bags!
jonathansoma.com
The data set that @Zimbabwe referred to was last updated in 2012. The sources that Soma used to put together his maps still update. It's possible for any of us, if we are good enough with data manipulations, to update maps with more recent data.
It showed that the USA is essentially a sausage fest for men under the age of 40 in most metro areas. It's unlikely that has changed much since 2012. It might have even gotten worse.
en.m.wikipedia.org
