wtf is wrong here?

[drZaius09]

Originally posted by Eyecandie4ya
Take a poll of females who dated a guy that was a challenge to them. Reality shows that they're more grateful for something that they have to chase a little to get what they want instead of it being handed to them. That's just the way it is.

But it does not increase their ATTRACTION. That is the point being made here. ATTRACTION will not fluctuate as a result of your unavailability. Therefore, her ATTRACTION will rise or fall on it's own accord whenever there is an interaction, regardless of how long you delay the interaction.

What Blitz is saying is that being a "challenge" is not a magical pill that will make you irresistable to women. When you are more available to a woman her attraction remains the same, yet she feels little need to express that attraction. Conversely, when you are more of a "challenge" and less available, her need to express her attraction becomes stronger. That is where everybody here is confused-- they see more expression when they make themselves scarce, and that leads them to believe that an attraction has been built or bolstered, which couldn't be further from the truth.

 

[Eyecandie4ya]

Originally posted by drZaius09
But it does not increase their ATTRACTION. That is the point being made here. ATTRACTION will not fluctuate as a result of your unavailability. Therefore, her ATTRACTION will rise or fall on it's own accord whenever there is an interaction, regardless of how long you delay the interaction.

What Blitz is saying is that being a "challenge" is not a magical pill that will make you irresistable to women. When you are more available to a woman her attraction remains the same, yet she feels little need to express that attraction. Conversely, when you are more of a "challenge" and less available, her need to express her attraction becomes stronger. That is where everybody here is confused-- they see more expression when they make themselves scarce, and that leads them to believe that an attraction has been built or bolstered, which couldn't be further from the truth.

I didn't state that him being away would have made the "attraction" greater.. The "attraction" was there but now it's gone. I just pointed out an error that was made that added fuel to fire.

Are you telling me that she had no attraction for him?

 

[xblitz44x]

Dr., now you see why I bang my head against the desk. Good reply, I think I'm going to let this thread alone.

 

[Cuervo666]

Wow, what a difference a few years make. I can't believe I was such a dumbass, lol. Mods, please delete all my posts and threads, I am not getting the option to do so. I find my threads/posts embarrassing and wish to have them removed. I think I just puked a bit in my mouth reading all of that, lmfao!!!