Women are here to please men.

[Darth]

That is basically their purpose on this earth, to make us happy. God made Eve basically because Adam was bored.

With that in mind, I think it's foolish not to hold them to that standard. In other words, if they're not pleasing you, texting at dinner or doing something stupid, or if they make b!tchy excuses like "I have my own life"....

I think you should call them out on it. They're not doing their job! So call them out on it.

This is what our great-grandfathers understand and we don't.

This may more fall under the heading of "relationship game" but I think it's worth mentioning.

 

[Fireballs]

Do you call them out on little things like that or do you withdraw your attention and go be busy with something else when they do something minor that displeases you?

This is where I have most trouble as I feel like a sulking b!tch for calling them out on things like this as opposed to withdrawing my attention for a few hours.

 

[nyc123]

I disagree.

 

[jurry]

Great strategy if you want a dumbass 1950s style housewife for a girlfriend, and yes there are certainly plenty of them out there. Those of us with a brain that enjoy being challenged and growing with/ learning from a person who does have their own life have a completely different outlook, however.

That being said, it doesnt mean you let a girl treat you like shît and walk all over you, which is maybe the point you are making.

 

[PeasantPlayer]

I don't believe in the bible so this philosophy doesn't pertain to me

 

[Tictac]

Let us know how this goes for you.

I predict misery.

 

[Darth]

Let us know how this goes for you.

I predict misery.

That's not really the point. I'm looking for a correct relationship between men and women. As late as the 60s-70s, this was the norm.

Your line is one I usually hear from feminist women, that I will die alone and be "miserable" because of this attitude.

Time will tell, but I suspect I will be quite happy avoiding marriage unless the girl is willing to do her job as my girl.

I'm at my grandparent's house and seeing a case study in how this is supposed to work, which is what motivated me to write this post.

Great strategy if you want a dumbass 1950s style housewife for a girlfriend

LOL. I am not prejudiced against dumbasses.

What do you eventually want out of life?

Relationship? kids, family?

Yes to all.

Do you call them out on little things like that or do you withdraw your attention and go be busy with something else when they do something minor that displeases you?

This is where I have most trouble as I feel like a sulking b!tch for calling them out on things like this as opposed to withdrawing my attention for a few hours.

I think it depends on what your relationship is. If you don't know the girl well, you withdraw your attention. If you have some rights to her, i.e. if she is "yours", then I would directly call her out on it. Yes, if you are just one guy she is dating and you start calling her out whenever she does something that displeases you, you are in fact a sulking b!tch. You don't know her and therefore you have no right to tell her what to do.

 

[zekko]

This is what our great-grandfathers understand and we don't.

Here's the problem. In our great-grandfather's day it was true. Women relied on men for thier lives, they couldn't support themselves. Men had all the money, power, and places to live. Women had to please us if they wanted us to take care of them and give them children.

That is not really the case anymore. Women now work themselves, some have good careers. If they don't have any money, the state will step in and give them welfare, housing, and food stamps. And the more illegitimate children they have, the more help they get. So they are no longer in debt to us to have to please us.

This is why the genders are out of balance these days. The government will take the role of Provider and Protector, so women don't have to depend on men anymore.

 

[El Payaso]

Here's the problem. In our great-grandfather's day it was true. Women relied on men for thier lives, they couldn't support themselves. Men had all the money, power, and places to live. Women had to please us if they wanted us to take care of them and give them children.

That is not really the case anymore. Women now work themselves, some have good careers. If they don't have any money, the state will step in and give them welfare, housing, and food stamps. And the more illegitimate children they have, the more help they get. So they are no longer in debt to us to have to please us.

This is why the genders are out of balance these days. The government will take the role of Provider and Protector, so women don't have to depend on men anymore.

So spot on!!!

 

[( . )( . )]

I smell vagina

Great strategy if you want a dumbass 1950s style housewife for a girlfriend

Yeah one of those dumbass 1950's style housewife girlfriends? YUCK !!! (Said no man ever)

http://www.j-walk.com/other/goodwife/images/goodwifeguide.gif

Those of us with a brain that enjoy being challenged and growing with/ learning from a person who does have their own life have a completely different outlook, however.

I too have a set of manboobs and a low testosterone count so naturally I want to be "challenged" by a freshly indoctrinated cultural marxist c@ck carouselling social justice warrior up to her manjaw in student debt. Those influx of liberal arts degrees paving the way to her makework cubicle "career" make all the difference.

"Challenge, Growing, Learning, Pegging, Pozzing"

 

[Darth]

This is why the genders are out of balance these days. The government will take the role of Provider and Protector, so women don't have to depend on men anymore.

Great point.

Yeah one of those dumbass 1950's style housewife girlfriends? YUCK !!! (Said no man ever)

http://www.j-walk.com/other/goodwife/images/goodwifeguide.gif

LMAO

 

[The Duke]

There is no point in wistfully looking at the past.

The idea is to look honestly and thoroughly at the present, and develop a strategy and position to deal with it.

You can learn a lot about the current situation by understanding what happened in the past. The past is also a good lesson on how not to repeat those same mistakes!

If you refused to look at the past, you might end up marrying your exwife again!

 

[om1xr]

But the real question is : " Are you a MAN that a high quality woman wants to please? "

Most people want to own a Ferrari but only the ones that can afford its value can actually get it!

 

[narcissist]

Dont believe in the bible. And dont believe in your hypothesis. I think you need to rethink your prospects.

 

[TheGambino]

I agree with mr Darth. girls are here to please men, that's it

 

[jurry]

I challenge myself, I don't need a woman to do it for me. If that is what is required of you for motivation, that's an inner game problem, not a problem with a sweet, submissive, feminine woman at your side.

To each his own. A doormat cook with tits quickly bores me, but i guess a lot of men are still intimidated by the idea of a woman doing her own thing.

And please dont try and tell me about "inner game problems", you dont know me son.

 

[jurry]

I too have a set of manboobs and a low testosterone count so naturally I want to be "challenged" by a freshly indoctrinated cultural marxist c@ck carouselling social justice warrior up to her manjaw in student debt. Those influx of liberal arts degrees paving the way to her makework cubicle "career" make all the difference.

Try again but this time use your brain and not the latest rush limbaugh talking points you've memorized and project onto strangers.

 

[Darth]

A doormat cook with tits quickly bores me, but i guess a lot of men are still intimidated by the idea of a woman doing her own thing.
.

"Intimidated" sounds like something a feminist would say. I don't think that's quite right.

How about "revolted"?



And I love the assumption that because women are here to please men, that means they can't "do their own thing." What is "her own thing"?

If it's to do something that is not pleasing to a man, then "her own thing" is "the wrong thing." Period.

My point was, things with inter-gender dynamics are not going back to the 1930's. Simply NOT.

How do we best deal with it going forward?

Across the board, it would take a massive cultural shift similar to what happened during the 1930s after the feminist 1920s.

Practically, however, you can find girls like this on an individual basis. And if a girl does not have this attitude of pleasing you, you deserve BETTER.

There are these girls out there; they are extremely high value. The best possible thing for a young man to do, if you don't want a miserable marriage or girlfriend, is to become an absolute master of your craft and rise to the top of your career, and forget about women...then, you can actually have a woman that is what you deserve.

Back in the 1950s, all the betas got women that were programmed correctly. Maybe they weren't as hot as the ones the alphas got, but they were still programmed correctly.

Are you telling me that I don't even deserve a girl that is moderately cute who is PROGRAMMED correctly? That these girls don't exist and therefore we must SETTLE for unhappiness?

No...those girls are out there, and to get them I am going to kick A$$ in my career...yeah, I'm going to be one of "those guys." LOL

 

[( . )( . )]

Try again but this time use your brain and not the latest rush limbaugh talking points you've memorized and project onto strangers.

And that's quite the "edgy" comeback you've memorized when someone points out your cuckold fetish. (Oh yeah and say "brain" a few more times to really sell it)

To each his own. A doormat cook with tits quickly bores me, but i guess a lot of men are still intimidated by the idea of a woman doing her own thing.

You mean women once cooked meals for their families!!!??? *GAHHHHHHHH......THE HORROR*

"Intimidated" sounds like something a feminist would say. I don't think that's quite right.

:yes: "Intimidated" by a certain type of woman is a word generally used by net drain careerist hags and "men" like this and this

Pro-tip. Nobody is "intimidated" by your barren womb, high test count and unpleasant disposition you silly pantsuit wearing 2nd rate man.

 

[jurry]

And that's quite the "edgy" comeback you've memorized when someone points out your cuckold fetish. (Oh yeah and say "brain" a few more times to really sell it)



You mean women once cooked meals for their families!!!??? *GAHHHHHHHH......THE HORROR*



:yes: "Intimidated" by a certain type of woman is a word generally used by net drain careerist hags and "men" like this and this

Pro-tip. Nobody is "intimidated" by your barren womb, high test count and unpleasant disposition you silly pantsuit wearing 2nd rate man.

I know your failures with women have made you so miserable that you take to internet forums to whine about them and divert arguments with nonsense and flame strangers to feel good about yourself, its ok. We're here for you. Acceptance is the first part towards moving forward.