Why Women Began to Suck

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

This is a continuation of my other thread (http://www.sosuave.net/forum/threads/the-secret-of-the-woman.238583/). As promised, I talk about how Western women have become poisoned in the first place. Why are Eastern women better? Well they are more likely to serve men, they are more feminine, submissive, etc. They are more NATURAL. Western women tend to be so much more rude, arrogant, out of shape, and shallow. It was the culture they were raised in. And men just let this happen. Take this quote for example:

The male human being has always been innovative and the first to achieve most things known to man. We were the first on the moon, invented the nuclear bomb, built extraordinary bridges and other huge complicated structures. We have started big wars and actually we were the first to kill another human being. Why the fvck are we failing to find solutions to this feminist **** and put a stop to it. Something is not right somewhere or has gone wrong. It's time we went back to the drawing table and come up with either a spray, gadget or whatever, that could be used to neutralize and get the feminists to obey and respect males for good. As a result, we could have all the dipping "tussy" in the world.

It is true, almost everything in the world was created by men. But yet, women have outshadowed men in terms of social control and power. The issue is that Western women are fvcked up. Like psychologically messed up for life and will never become anything close to their Eastern counterparts unless they go through intense rehabilitation, become completely enveloped in a society that strongly encourages/promotes the feminization of women and masculinization of men, or become self-aware of all of this and choose to COMPLETELY submit to men consciously and subconsciously. The West has almost completely destroyed the feminine imperative and is even looking to emasculate men as well which further destroys the chances of producing anymore TRUE women.

How did this happen?
It was all about money and power. The wealthy were insecure of losing all of their wealth and power. The Rockefeller Foundation funded second-wave feminism preaching about 'equality' and 'girl power' and whatnot despite women already having equal rights beforehand. The reason for promoting this was because they wanted women to work more. That allowed these super wealthy businessmen to raise prices on all possible goods because now the average household had a dual source of income. The government allowed it as well because that also meant that they could tax more. In the end, the man gets screwed.
But that's not all of it. Feminism also was/is used to destroy the family unit and to break men. When women are at work, who is to be at home taking care of the kids? No one. This forces you to enroll your kids in school from a younger age which in turn allows them to indoctrinate how your kids think from a younger age. And because the mom is working all the time now, there isn't much of a family anymore. Therefore, the kids start looking at the state as their family. They look at the school and teachers and official as family rather than their parents teaching them.

Why Target Women?
Think back to primordial times. The man chooses the woman, the woman just has to be attractive enough. While the man technically does have the power, he can be influenced. His testosterone drives him to seek out women. The more testosterone you have, the hornier you bastards are. Well there are certain ways a woman can make a man choose her. All of these ways are subtle and subconscious, but women tend to exhibit these traits more depending on which part of their monthly cycle they are on. With the cultural shift feminism caused, the whole 'woman empowerment' and 'chivalry' garbage creeped its way into every echelon of the Western world all the way from TV shows for kids to magazines to mainstream media dating all the way back to the 50s (see Operation Mockingbird. Gloria Steinem even stated how the CIA funded Ms. Magazine). This essentially taught women what these subtle traits are in order to attract men. And driven by our testosterone, we think we had a say in our choosing but we really did not. Women were targeted first because that caused us men to follow. You cannot break a man head on. Men are direct and we deal with issues from the outside in, it is our specialty and that is typically in our nature. Women are indirect and as such deal with issues from the inside out. This is why women were targeted; they are our opposites. They programmed women what to do through society and women carried out that order in the way they are specialized in: they broke us from the inside out by playing these 'games'.

The West is still insecure about a big change going in the opposite direction. That is why they are always destroying the Eastern hemisphere; Clinton wanting to wage war against Russia, the constant destabilization of the middle east, billions in spending to prevent the industrial and technological growth of India and China only to fail, etc.

I want to end it here before I get too much into crazy conspiracy theories because this already sounds like one. Feel free to add any more info if you'd like.

 

[Serenity]

Eastern women are more helpless because of the culture they were raised in and the social expectation that they're good for nothing other than cooking, cleaning and sucking d!ck.

Western women are independent and resourceful. They don't depend on a man for resources anymore because equal rights allow them to work for their own resources. They don't have to accept anything they don't like from a man because of this.

Eastern women on the other hand will accept sh!tty character traits in men to secure resources. They are not capable of working for their own resources, mainly because the culture disregards women.

I know some guys in real life with views similar to yours, they're all massive losers in the dating game. So they reject western women and go for the eastern ones, in particular Thai women. The reason Thai women are so "nice" is basically a desperate hope of attracting a westerner who's only significant attribute is that he's got more money than her, which to a western man is a really fvcking low bar to get above.

I prefer western women because they cost less and are more useful.

 

[The Duke]

So how do you win this battle with Western women?

Not commit? Have multiples?

 

[l_e_g_e_n_d]

So how do you win this battle with Western women?

Not commit? Have multiples?

The more I think about it, all the bad apples I chose (and they were not that many) had glaring red flags that I chose to overlook.

Have the gonads and discernment to vet and Next savagely, my friend.

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

So how do you win this battle with Western women?

Not commit? Have multiples?

That's for you to decide. You can't really 'win' completely unless you completely activate the core of their very being; very few people in this world know how to do that. Gaining knowledge about this is the first step. You change society by changing the social rules. You make the rules based on your personality and how sure of yourself you are. You must have a stronger personality than most others so that way they conform to YOUR rules, because they think that is what is normal. Plus, people are less willing to challenge your viewpoints and if they do, you will be able to fight back. Usually people will shame you if they disagree with you on certain rules, but if you shame them back, they will feel idiotic and embarassed.

 

[Serenity]

So how do you win this battle with Western women?

Not commit? Have multiples?

It's not a fight, you can never win thinking of it like this. You cannot fight someone who doesn't give a sh!t, walk away and don't fight back.

Western women has a power that men are starting to forget, the power of no. If a man has unacceptable traits to a particular woman she will simply say no, walk away and life continues like before. She will only accept a man who meets certain minimum criteria.

Men simply has to make a more detailed assessment of what type of woman they are getting themselves involved with, have a clear set of boundaries and then have the balls to enforce those boundaries. In enforcing the boundaries there's only one way to effectively do it, that is to do it like they do it. Walk away if they don't respect it.

If they have been made aware of where you draw the line and what the consequence for crossing it is, then there is no fvcking valid excuse for crossing it. No matter what bullsh!t she spins, do not bend.

As I said, the solution is to not fight. Do not argue and do not let hard boundaries be open for discussion. She either respects it or she doesn't exist to you. Fighting is a giant waste of time and energy that achieves exactly nothing, walking away simply ignoring her ends it instantly and allows you to move on to positive things.

So be unrelenting and next all those you find intolerable. Provide no excuse, you can freely discriminate and pick who you would allow. Do not fight, just move on.

It is becoming increasingly rare to see a man with this level of self-respect, a trait which they find extremely attractive. This is where passing sh!t tests become crucial, because they WILL by using that method figure out if you're faking or you really are that strong willed. There is only one way and that is to prove that sh!t has consequences, a faker will do anything except actually enforce his boundaries.

This only applies if your boundaries don't conflict with the woman's boundaries. That will in mature people end in going separate ways, in immature people it ends in fighting and a senseless waste of time trying to change other people's boundaries thus further disrespecting them.

 

[The Duke]

It's not a fight, you can never win thinking of it like this. You cannot fight someone who doesn't give a sh!t, walk away and don't fight back.

Western women has a power that men are starting to forget, the power of no. If a man has unacceptable traits to a particular woman she will simply say no, walk away and life continues like before. She will only accept a man who meets certain minimum criteria.

Men simply has to make a more detailed assessment of what type of woman they are getting themselves involved with, have a clear set of boundaries and then have the balls to enforce those boundaries. In enforcing the boundaries there's only one way to effectively do it, that is to do it like they do it. Walk away if they don't respect it.

If they have been made aware of where you draw the line and what the consequence for crossing it is, then there is no fvcking valid excuse for crossing it. No matter what bullsh!t she spins, do not bend.

As I said, the solution is to not fight. Do not argue and do not let hard boundaries be open for discussion. She either respects it or she doesn't exist to you. Fighting is a giant waste of time and energy that achieves exactly nothing, walking away simply ignoring her ends it instantly and allows you to move on to positive things.

So be unrelenting and next all those you find intolerable. Provide no excuse, you can freely discriminate and pick who you would allow. Do not fight, just move on.

It is becoming increasingly rare to see a man with this level of self-respect, a trait which they find extremely attractive. This is where passing sh!t tests become crucial, because they WILL by using that method figure out if you're faking or you really are that strong willed. There is only one way and that is to prove that sh!t has consequences, a faker will do anything except actually enforce his boundaries.

This only applies if your boundaries don't conflict with the woman's boundaries. That will in mature people end in going separate ways, in immature people it ends in fighting and a senseless waste of time trying to change other people's boundaries thus further disrespecting them.

I agree with what you said for the most part, but I feel you took my term "battle" out of context.

With my question I was really getting at how do you pull power away from modern woman(more from a sociological view point)? They need throttled back, there is nothing keeping them in check. Its socially acceptable to be a single mommy, its socially acceptable to have multiple sechs partners, its socially acceptable to have abortions, its socially acceptable to live on birth control. More women go to college than men. More women own houses than ever before. More women are in management than ever before. Its socially acceptable to get divorced. A big role reversal is happening. None of these things used to be true. There is little to keep a woman standing next to her man.

I see these "male" Millenial's that dress like girls, act like girls, and have zero traditional man skills. No wonder women feel the need to be the man in relationships. I hear complaints from women all the time that they can't find manly men anymore.

I thank God for Putin and Trump. Its obvious where they stand in regards to women and I think it will create some followers in helping right the ship.

 

[Serenity]

@Howiestern You don't pull power away from others, you empower yourself.

As it is women gain power, in some areas more power than men. Men do not inherently become more powerful by dragging women down, they just appear more powerful in comparison. It would be like shooting your competition in sports, you still suck just as much but appear as the best because you literally took out the competition.

This would mean that by your current mindset of wanting to take women down rather than improving yourself, women are in fact more powerful. By men improving themselves they may actually gain power and be able to compete rather than just appearing more powerful.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

I agree with what you said for the most part, but I feel you took my term "battle" out of context.

With my question I was really getting at how do you pull power away from modern woman(more from a sociological view point)? They need throttled back, there is nothing keeping them in check. Its socially acceptable to be a single mommy, its socially acceptable to have multiple sechs partners, its socially acceptable to have abortions, its socially acceptable to live on birth control. More women go to college than men. More women own houses than ever before. More women are in management than ever before. Its socially acceptable to get divorced. A big role reversal is happening. None of these things used to be true. There is little to keep a woman standing next to her man.

I see these "male" Millenial's that dress like girls, act like girls, and have zero traditional man skills. No wonder women feel the need to be the man in relationships. I hear complaints from women all the time that they can't find manly men anymore.

I thank God for Putin and Trump. Its obvious where they stand in regards to women and I think it will create some followers in helping right the ship.

Trump treats his woman like crap. Obama showed much more class and good treatment of his wife. Who would you rather you daughter be with?

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

@Howiestern You don't pull power away from others, you empower yourself.

As it is women gain power, in some areas more power than men. Men do not inherently become more powerful by dragging women down, they just appear more powerful in comparison. It would be like shooting your competition in sports, you still suck just as much but appear as the best because you literally took out the competition.

This would mean that by your current mindset of wanting to take women down rather than improving yourself, women are in fact more powerful. By men improving themselves they may actually gain power and be able to compete rather than just appearing more powerful.

There's a phrase here: knock them off their pedestal. There's a dofference between dragging them down to oblivion and slapping them across the face to wake up.

Trump treats his woman like crap. Obama showed much more class and good treatment of his wife. Who would you rather you daughter be with?

Obama was a pushover and was gonna get a divorce for a while there, remember? People say that Trump treated women like crap, but at the same time they forget that Bill Clinton raped a 12 year old girl who got laughed at by Hillary.

 

[The Duke]

@Howiestern You don't pull power away from others, you empower yourself.

As it is women gain power, in some areas more power than men. Men do not inherently become more powerful by dragging women down, they just appear more powerful in comparison. It would be like shooting your competition in sports, you still suck just as much but appear as the best because you literally took out the competition.

This would mean that by your current mindset of wanting to take women down rather than improving yourself, women are in fact more powerful. By men improving themselves they may actually gain power and be able to compete rather than just appearing more powerful.

Grewd- so what happens to the guy that has improved himself and is a top level competitor and still has difficulties? Whats the solution to that problem?

Its like the US Military giving its technology to foreign nations. We were at one time the greatest Military in the world. Now days we ship used F-16's to almost any foreign nation that will pay money. The F-16 is no longer superior technology, however it gives capabilities to nations that never had such making them more effective than ever before. Now these foreign nations can reverse engineer our technology and improve upon it. Eventually we will have some serious competitors on our hands. It won't be so easy. The price to play will go up. That's how competition works. I've been a part of it for a long time and still am.

You certainly don't retain power by giving it away. You keep what you learn, your keep the technology you develop, and you try not to inform them. You don't want to fix their problems(give them power) because they will use it against you and that's exactly what is happening.

There is a point where you can only keep improving so much. The better you get, the smaller advancements you make. Then what?

 

[The Duke]

Trump treats his woman like crap. Obama showed much more class and good treatment of his wife. Who would you rather you daughter be with?

Trump no doubt. I see more submissiveness out of Trumps wife than Obama's. Trump keeps a good frame with her.

Obama's wife goes against every thing that is taught here, so does Bill Clintons wife.

 

[RangerMIke]

Women do not suck. The problem is that men expect women to act like men without social conditioning or discipline.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

There's a phrase here: knock them off their pedestal. There's a dofference between dragging them down to oblivion and slapping them across the face to wake up.

Obama was a pushover and was gonna get a divorce for a while there, remember? People say that Trump treated women like crap, but at the same time they forget that Bill Clinton raped a 12 year old girl who got laughed at by Hillary.

Man you guys are blind. Obama had the whole world against him. His wife and him showed very good cooperation, and were a good example. If you cannot see that your brainwashed. Michelle could've easily cut this mans nuts off in the public eye before he even became a president.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

Trump no doubt. I see more submissiveness out of Trumps wife than Obama's. Trump keeps a good frame with her.

Obama's wife goes against every thing that is taught here, so does Bill Clintons wife.

I'm not ashamed to say I do not agree.

 

[logicallefty]

Michelle could've easily cut this mans nuts off in the public eye before he even became a president.

I guarantee if Michelle O. even wanted to sabotage her hubby, she wouldn't have. Because then she would have also been sabotaging herself. Who would she be without him?

 

[mrgoodstuff]

I guarantee if Michelle O. even wanted to sabotage her hubby, she wouldn't have. Because then she would have also been sabotaging herself. Who would she be without him?

She was already moving fast and high in life, personally I believe her support put him over the top. I can't imagine her starving him for sex. She said "I would never do anything to hurt my husband in public". After all of us who have had wives and LTR's complain about the selfishness of woman, this POWERFUL woman showed submission around her husband and didn't detract from him. She added.

When she met him she was already working as a lawyer and he was an intern working under her.

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

Man you guys are blind. Obama had the whole world against him. His wife and him showed very good cooperation, and were a good example. If you cannot see that your brainwashed. Michelle could've easily cut this mans nuts off in the public eye before he even became a president.

Like logicallefty said, she would be nothing without him. She felt she had something to lose.

She said "I would never do anything to hurt my husband in public". After all of us who have had wives and LTR's complain about the selfishness of woman, this POWERFUL woman showed submission around her husband and didn't detract from him. She added.

Like she would ever say anything different. Not even a feminist could say the opposite and get away with it unscathed, are you kidding me? What a woman says and does are 2 very different things, we all know this by now.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

Like logicallefty said, she would be nothing without him. She felt she had something to lose.

Like she would ever say anything different. Not even a feminist could say the opposite and get away with it unscathed, are you kidding me? What a woman says and does are 2 very different things, we all know this by now.

What about oprah and Steadman? She hasn't paraded him out like the c0ck king. I know he probably treats her good, but it's not the same dynamic. Her statement is I appreciate him but im fine without him. Michelle and Barack was about the teamwork what relationships are all about.

That's what I'm talking about, the beauty of realizing NONE OF US MAKE IT ON OUR OWN. Whombetter to goto sleep at night but the one who has your back. I've had women fight for me, I've had them support me while I'm temporarily down, I've had them damage control for me, and I've had the "hot girl" you guys are so crazy about who only thinks about THEMSELVES. Some women ARE loyal, but the world is working hard to try to change that. But the LOYAL woman does not like the ways of a "hot girl"... They kinda hate it.

 

[The Duke]

I guarantee if Michelle O. even wanted to sabotage her hubby, she wouldn't have. Because then she would have also been sabotaging herself. Who would she be without him?

Remember Hillary never made a big deal out of Bill leaving kum stains on Monica's blue dress!! She had reasons not to sabotage him and knew what effect that would have on her political career. Who would Hillary be with out Bill?