“The 22 Rules That Turned Me From Invisible to Irresistible With Women… Starting Tonight”

You can skip the expensive cars, the fancy clothes, and the endless gym selfies. Completely unnecessary.

I used to freeze the second a beautiful woman looked my way. Frustrated. Awkward. Watching other guys walk away with the girl while I stood there tongue-tied.

Then I discovered 22 simple rules that rewired my entire dating life. The anxiety vanished. Conversations flowed effortlessly. Women started chasing me for a change.

These rules trigger a woman's subconscious attraction switches. And you can start using them tonight.

Read more...

Why is "Woman-ese" censored?

Deep Dish

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 25, 2002
Messages
2,191
Reaction score
175
Go try looking up any post on woman-ese (except minus the hyphen) or type it in anywhere. As of this moment, the word is as obscene as fvck, shyt, c0ck, and any other word which takes a liking to ********.

Has a feminist conspiracy infiltrated sosuave.com?

:crackup:
 
Last edited:

"She Laughed All Night. Then She Ghosted You. Here's Why."

Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.

Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?

You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.

Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.

Read more...

RedPill

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 13, 2005
Messages
791
Reaction score
50
Location
Midwest America
My guess would be one of the sponsers of the main site has a copyright on the term and would not like to see it used unless it's in conjunction with their materials... but I have no real idea.
 

Desdinova

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
11,680
Reaction score
4,877
My guess would be one of the sponsers of the main site has a copyright on the term and would not like to see it used unless it's in conjunction with their materials...
You are correct. Apparently, the person who has a trademark on the term didn't appreciate it being used on the forum.
 

"You'll Never Feel READY to Walk Over"

Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.

You've been "getting ready" for two years.

She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.

Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.

Read more...

Rollo Tomassi

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
5,307
Reaction score
343
Age
58
Location
Nevada
I'm tradmarking AFC, DJ and HB next,..bwahahaha! I'm brilliant!
 

Deep Dish

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 25, 2002
Messages
2,191
Reaction score
175
Out of skepticism, because who bothers to check credentials, I looked it up and surprisingly enough there indeed is a registered trademark. According to the USPTO:
Goods and Services: Educational services, namely, providing seminars, classes, workshops in the field of communications, specifically communicative distinctions between men and women; educational services, namely, conducting on-line exhibitions and displays and interactive exhibits in the field of communications, specifically communicative distinctions between men and women; development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of communications, specifically communicative distinctions between men and women. FIRST USE: 1999-07-21. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 1999-09-15

Serial Number: 78702897
Filing Date: August 29, 2005

Registration Number: 3157412
Registration Date: October 17, 2006
Owner: LINGUISTIC DYNAMICS, INC. CORPORATION ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE SAC AND FOX NATION BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT OF 2000 BY THE SAC AND FOX NATION, A UNITED STATES FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBE UNITED STATES, LAS VEGAS NEVADA 89134
It's owned by an Indian tribe?

Well, guys, it's official. I announce to hold trademark over p*ssy (both the uncensored and censored version ;))
 

"You'll Never Feel READY to Walk Over"

Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.

You've been "getting ready" for two years.

She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.

Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.

Read more...

Bible_Belt

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
17,577
Reaction score
6,360
Age
50
Location
midwestern cow field 40
I have an IP law final next week

Trademark’s main purpose is to identify the SOURCE of goods or services
Guiding principle of TM law = CONSUMER PERCEPTION

II What can be a mark
A Names, symbols, logos, company names, slogans or phrases
B Also colors, fragrances, sounds — so long as the mark serves the purpose of conveying the SOURCE of the goods
 

Ice Cold

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
2,313
Reaction score
2
Location
Moscow
I don't get it... why ban it on the forum. A lot of words can be and ARE trademarked... doesn't mean it's an automatic infingement.

I can say canon and nikon... and "american standard" on here. IPod... All of those words are trademarked. Yet, I can't say woomanese?

it's really interesting
 

RedPill

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 13, 2005
Messages
791
Reaction score
50
Location
Midwest America
Ice Cold said:
I don't get it... why ban it on the forum. A lot of words can be and ARE trademarked... doesn't mean it's an automatic infingement.

I can say canon and nikon... and "american standard" on here. IPod... All of those words are trademarked. Yet, I can't say woomanese?

it's really interesting
Ice, are you aware of what purpose this place serves? Take a look at the links at the very top of this page. And then take a look at the dozens of new threads on the main discussion forum. And then look at the .com page. And look at the main forum again. And then do a Google search for "picking up women". And then click on the main forum again.

Proverb: When he who has the information meets he who has the money, he who has the money shall have information and he who has the information shall have money. (And he who contributes significant money-per-click can have his proprietary information changed into asterisks, Asian symbols, or little tiny vagina-looking characters if he so desires to maintain the exlcusivity of its use - hypothetically speaking, of course)
 

Ice Cold

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
2,313
Reaction score
2
Location
Moscow
I'm have no clue when it comes to law man. It's all so very convoluted.
 

"She Laughed All Night. Then She Ghosted You. Here's Why."

Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.

Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?

You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.

Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.

Read more...

Rollo Tomassi

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
5,307
Reaction score
343
Age
58
Location
Nevada
I'm now charging a nominal fee of 5 cents for every instance someone uses my trademarked term Average Frustrated Chump (and it's derivative abreviation, AFC).

Don't worry, I accept PayPal.
 

Scrumtulescence

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 23, 2004
Messages
947
Reaction score
3
Age
45
Location
Inyurvij Eina
Looks like they also banned the word "outw@ards". What kind of retarded sh1t is this? I get the feeling thinking up random words to censor is the only entertainment the admins have during the day. Losers.
 

JesterX

Don Juan
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
****ing ******ds ******** bull****.

we should dedicate a thread to every censored word.
 

Deep Dish

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 25, 2002
Messages
2,191
Reaction score
175
In regards to trademark law, there's not much standing in the way of mentioning Woman-ese despite the trademark owners unfavorable feelings of its usage on this site. I can respect Allen's respecting the owner's request but that won't stop me from sidestepping the censor.
From "Fair Use of Trademarks":

An author's use of a trademark for the above-referenced situations should be considered a non-confusing "nominative use" when it meets the following requirements: (1) the trademark owner's product or service must be one that is not readily identifiable without the use of the trademark; (2) the author only uses as much of the trademark as is reasonably necessary to identify the trademark owner's products or services; and (3) the author does nothing that would, in conjunction with the trademark, suggest to the reader sponsorship or endorsement by the trademark owner.
(1) That's easily accomplished. When the general public thinks "Woman-ese" they probably don't think of that commercial service. They didn't even invent the word but just snagged it out of the public domain. In fact, I can prove the term pre-dates the registration by at least four years. Go to Google.com and search their USENET archive for the term. (I can't directly link because of the censor).

(2) That's easy. References are sporadic.

(3) That's easy. Do you ever see any posts which suggest Woman-ese as a product? Also, this is a forum, unofficial commentary, not the main site.

Furthermore, trademarks have been nulllified by the courts if the term is used commonly enough by the public and a good example is the word jello. Perform a Google search for "woman-ese" (530 results) and see just how many references are made regarding the registered service. Only two that I can find.

In summary, the legal basis of the trademark is flimsy and it's in my Fair Use to use the term. I respect Allen for honoring the request but I don't share the respect for the trademark owner. Hell, probably the only reason why the owner requested its removal on here is because their business is sluggish.

:p
 

"You Can't Argue a Woman Into Liking You"

You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.

She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.

Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.

Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.

Read more...

Top