Why is Rent-A-Gent not considered sexist, but "boob ads" selling beer are?

[MatureDJ]

I was surfing the internet and found this gem:

http://rentagent.me/faq1

Q: What inspired the Rent A Gent idea? We attended a few boring bachelorette parties where the oily guy who showed up at the door looked nothing like the guy we chose and couldn’t carry on a 5 minute conversation. We ordered a 6'1 model and got a 5'6 hairy beast. There was also a birthday party of an ex where one of us wanted to bring the most handsome date in NYC and couldn’t find anyone with a short notice. That’s where the Rent A Gent concept of men on demand was born.

Of course, motivating heterosexual men to drink a certain beer brand by having an ad with (gasp) attractive women finding men who drink that beer as attractive themselves is sexist:

http://msmagazine.com/blog/2012/07/03/sexual-objectification-part-1-what-is-it/

The breasts of the woman in this beer ad, for example, are conflated with the cans.

my opinion: DOUBLE STANDARD!

 

[El Payaso]

Because women thrive on double standards.

Equality but only when convenient.

"Female sex bots are sexist, misogynistic, degrading and objectify women"

"What about dildos?"

"Well...ummm....uhhh....dildos empower women to explore their sexuality in an environment free from toxic masculinity."

"So basically you're objectifying a man down to his penis just like a female sex bot."

"No! Stop using common sense to refute me. You're oppressing me with your male facts."