Who Built The Great Pyramid In Egypt?

Modern Man Advice

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 3, 2021
Messages
1,493
Reaction score
2,626
Sure, anything is possible. It's possible that I am an alien from another galaxy. How can you be certain that I'm not? But just because something is possible doesn't mean it's probable. The simplest explanation is usually the correct one. And the simplest explanation is that the pyramids were built by people living in Egypt 5,000 years ago. They certainly has the technology, resources and know-how to build them without alien help. Now if a spaceship was discovered hidden in one of those pyramids, it would be a deferent story. But stone buildings themselves were not exactly high tech even in ancient Egypt.
k
 

CornbreadFed

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Messages
3,018
Reaction score
2,321
Age
30
Location
Nashville, TN
It is possible that the technology and tactics that the Ancient Egyptians used to build the pyramids were lost and never recovered after the Bronze Age Collapse. The Third Intermediate Period of Egypt witnessed political fragmentation, foreign invasions, and cultural changes, reflecting a complex era of transition, in contrast to the Giza Pyramid era marked by the pinnacle of monumental construction and centralization. Simply, there was no need or desire to build large stone structures, so the technology/tactics became obsolete.

Example:

If our society were to collapse tomorrow, enduring a prolonged period of hell and decline, upon the eventual recovery and adaptation to new necessities, there would be no imperative to recreate the towering skyscrapers that once characterized our cities. Does it mean aliens, or some mysterious civilization built the Empire State Building or Burj Khalifa? No, it just means human society saw zero need to implement it back into their civilization playbook.
 
Last edited:

Bokanovsky

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
4,735
Reaction score
4,359
The only problem is barely any evidence to suggest the Dynastic Egyptians built the Pyramids. So the simplest explanation is they didn't build it, in the absence of Evidence.

01. The limestone rocks and the granite used in building of the Pyramids, is quarried from Aswan.. Aswan is 530 miles South from the Giza Plateau.. Yes that's over 500 miles!

Some of these granite rocks weigh 80-100 tonnes.. They are crazy heavy.. The Dynastic Egyptians didn't even have the wheel & the only tools ever found are primitive copper tools. Egyptologists have suggested, "oh maybe they where transported by boat" How many boats have been found that have the ability to transport solid Granite weighing 100 tonnes over 500 miles? That's right ZERO.. The boats that have been excivated in Giza couldn't even manage 20 tonnes.

02. If the Dynastic Egyptians built the great pyramid, then why is the building of the great pyramid completely absent from their history.. Literally loads of Hieroglyphics & writings & parchments have been found & not ONCE do they mention ever building The Great Pyramid, neither do they aknowledge the Great Pyramid.. It's literally not mentioned.

Imagine the greatest structure on earth built by a civilisation, and they didn't even bother mention it once, in there History books or their stories or drawings. The Dynastic Egyptians where obsessed with relaying their History through Hieroglyphics, yet they couldn't bother with mentioning their greatest ever achievement.. Right that makes a whole lot of sense.

03. The great pyramid does not resemle a tomb in the slightest. Pretty much every single tomb found in Egypt, has Hieroglyphics, decorated with paintings and stories, a mummified body in some cases, or the least an empty sarcophagus. Often a tomb will have booby traps to protect the treasures.

Nothing about the great pyramid resembles a tomb.


No Gliphs
No body ever found
No decorations or paintings
No treasures or booby traps
No records in history of a mummy being found or removed from the pyramid.
No stories tales from the Egyptians of ever laying a Phaoro to rest inside the pyramid.

04. Roughly 2.4 million limestone rocks make up the structure of the great pyramid. Mainstream Egyptologist claim it took the Egyptians 20 years to build the Great Pyramid.. The math has already been done.. This would mean every 3 minutes, 24 hours a day, spanning 20 years, non stop a limestone rock weighing sometimes hundreds of tons would have to be laid down into the pyramid with razor sharp precise accuracy.. That's every 3 hours, for twenty years straight.. Decades of work & All this work for a body that decomposed in a matter of months? Haha ok I believe you.

The complete lack of evidence suggests that the Egyptians didn't build the great pyramid.
Most of the things in that copy and paste text are incorrect. Only granite was mined in Aswan, not limestone. Granite was used for decorative elements, not for building the main structure. Pyramids are mentioned in a number of Egyptian texts, including texts written by the very men who participated in the construction of the Great Pyramid. The text you quoted is nonsense.
 

soulforge

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
6,191
Reaction score
4,926
Most of the things in that copy and paste text are incorrect. Only granite was mined in Aswan, not limestone. Granite was used for decorative elements, not for building the main structure. Pyramids are mentioned in a number of Egyptian texts, including texts written by the very men who participated in the construction of the Great Pyramid. The text you quoted is nonsense.
Pyramids... Not the Great Pyramid.. The Egyptians cobbled together some terrible versions of Pyramids thousands of years down the line.. I reckon I could build one of those myself.

As for the Great Pyramid.. Nonsense.. Not a single Dynastic Egyptian Text or writing, that has been identified as authentic, talks about the construction of the Great Pyramid.. Your getting your pyramids all mixed up lol

And it wasn't copy paste, typed the whole thing out, just to help fill some of your knowledge gaps.
 

Bokanovsky

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
4,735
Reaction score
4,359
As for the Great Pyramid.. Nonsense.. Not a single Dynastic Egyptian Text or writing, that has been identified as authentic, talks about the construction of the Great Pyramid.. Your getting your pyramids all mixed up lol
"Astonishingly, the papyri were written by men who participated in the building of the Great Pyramid, the tomb of the Pharaoh Khufu, the first and largest of the three colossal pyramids at Giza just outside modern Cairo. Among the papyri was the journal of a previously unknown official named Merer, who led a crew of some 200 men who traveled from one end of Egypt to the other picking up and delivering goods of one kind or another. Merer, who accounted for his time in half-day increments, mentions stopping at Tura, a town along the Nile famous for its limestone quarry, filling his boat with stone and taking it up the Nile River to Giza."

 

soulforge

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
6,191
Reaction score
4,926
Most of the things in that copy and paste text are incorrect. Only granite was mined in Aswan, not limestone. Granite was used for decorative elements, not for building the main structure. Pyramids are mentioned in a number of Egyptian texts, including texts written by the very men who participated in the construction of the Great Pyramid. The text you quoted is nonsense.
If your talking about the Papyri that was discovered by the two french dudes.. That's been totally debunked lol

That Papyri only talks about some limestone being transported on some boats.

It's doesn't talk about the limestone being transported to be used inside the the Great Pyramid of Giza. It doesn't mention the size of the lime stone being transported and for how long they transported the limestone.

Dude those little wooden boats are not capable of shifting tons and tons of weight like that.. Neither can copper tools, shape and cut granite.

And granite was not used for decorative purposes in the great pyramid.. it was used for structural and support purposes in the grand gallery and the so called kings/Queens chamber.

Man your lacking basic common sense around this subject matter.
 

soulforge

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
6,191
Reaction score
4,926
"Astonishingly, the papyri were written by men who participated in the building of the Great Pyramid, the tomb of the Pharaoh Khufu, the first and largest of the three colossal pyramids at Giza just outside modern Cairo. Among the papyri was the journal of a previously unknown official named Merer, who led a crew of some 200 men who traveled from one end of Egypt to the other picking up and delivering goods of one kind or another. Merer, who accounted for his time in half-day increments, mentions stopping at Tura, a town along the Nile famous for its limestone quarry, filling his boat with stone and taking it up the Nile River to Giza."

Dude it's been debunked.. thanks for the dodgy evidence but it doesn't prove Shyte about how and who built the great pyramid.

Your lost beyond help man.
 

CornbreadFed

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Messages
3,018
Reaction score
2,321
Age
30
Location
Nashville, TN
It's doesn't talk about the limestone being transported to be used inside the the Great Pyramid of Giza. It doesn't mention the size of the lime stone being transported and for how long they transported the limestone.

Dude those little wooden boats are not capable of shifting tons and tons of weight like that.. Neither can copper tools, shape and cut granite.
Saying that they did previously possess these boats and tactics, why would they need them again? Egypt is one of the easiest places to invade, so building a large pyramid would require hegemonic dominance & stability which Egypt lost permanently after the Bronze Age Collapse.
 

Bokanovsky

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
4,735
Reaction score
4,359
Dude it's been debunked.. thanks for the dodgy evidence but it doesn't prove Shyte about how and who built the great pyramid.

Your lost beyond help man.
Debunked by whom? The flat earth society? So far, you haven't linked any sources to back up any of your claims.

Anyway, I'm done with this. You are free to believe whatever you want. I sincerely regret posting in this thread, as it was a waste of ten minutes of my life that I will never get back.
 

soulforge

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
6,191
Reaction score
4,926
Saying that they did previously possess these boats and tactics, why would they need them again? Egypt is one of the easiest places to invade, so building a large pyramid would require hegemonic dominance & stability which Egypt lost permanently after the Bronze Age Collapse.
It's all well and good hoping and imagining that maybe, possibly, they had these boats that can transport 100s of tons of weight..

But zero evidence supports this.. the fact that the Dynastic Egyptians themselves have ZERO to say about the Great Pyramid and How it was built,,, Speaks Volumes.
 

soulforge

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
6,191
Reaction score
4,926
It is possible that the technology and tactics that the Ancient Egyptians used to build the pyramids were lost and never recovered after the Bronze Age Collapse. The Third Intermediate Period of Egypt witnessed political fragmentation, foreign invasions, and cultural changes, reflecting a complex era of transition, in contrast to the Giza Pyramid era marked by the pinnacle of monumental construction and centralization. Simply, there was no need or desire to build large stone structures, so the technology/tactics became obsolete.

Example:

If our society were to collapse tomorrow, enduring a prolonged period of hell and decline, upon the eventual recovery and adaptation to new necessities, there would be no imperative to recreate the towering skyscrapers that once characterized our cities. Does it mean aliens, or some mysterious civilization built the Empire State Building or Burj Khalifa? No, it just means human society saw zero need to implement it back into their civilization playbook.
I'm totally in agreement that technology can be lost.. in-fact I believe it was a technologicaly advanced civilization that built the great pyramid.. and that technology is now lost... However ZERO evidence suggests that the Dynastic Egyptians ever had any of this technology.

We know they had copper tools... And that is it... Copper tools. You ain't cutting and shaping tons and tons of rock and granite with copper tools.

It is more likely a civilisation prior to the Egyptians had that technology & that technology is now lost.

The Sphinx is proof that the great pyramid is likely much older than the time of the Dynastic Egyptians maybe thousands of years older.. How do we know this?

By measuring the timeline of the water erosion around the sphinx enclosure.. that water erosion is thousands of years old..

The water erosion suggests that the Sphinx is likely 10,000 years old maybe older.. Therefore it is highly plausible that the Great Pyramid is also way way older than 4,000 years old, pre dating the Dynastic Egyptians.


main-qimg-3c3ed2e54ca19eff69809ebee9ebf505-lq.jpeg
 

soulforge

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
6,191
Reaction score
4,926
By the way.

Not only is there little evidence that the Dynastic Egyptians had the technology to build The Great Pyramid... They also had no chance of building these..

The huge granite boxes in the underground network of the Serapeum Of Saqqara.

This is an underground network, which happens to have 25 slots that have been built into the ground and these 100 tons solid granite boxes have been perfectly installed into each slot.

Fun Facts

These granite boxes weigh over one hundred tons each.

These boxes including the lids where cut from one single granite piece. These are not 5 separate pieces of granite simply joined together. The entire thing is cut from one huge slab of granite.

The precision cutting on these structures is super super precise.

They are huge, you would literally need hundreds of men to be able to move these things around, however it is not possible to get that type of man power inside the Serapeum as the corridors are way too narrow.. There isn't enough space/room to even get 20 hands on these things.

Lets me guess? They employed some slave midgets, and put them into work in the extremely tight work spaces right.

These things have been lowered into slots, and the floor/ground was built around them.

In-fact all the evidence suggests that these boxes absolutely could not have been introduced or physically moved into the Serapeum chamber, more likely the entire Serapeum complex was built around the boxes. That is just crazy.

Because mainstream Egyptologist cannot explain what the use of these boxes are, or how the hell they where built, how they where moved in, how the hell where they cut so precise.. The only answer they came up with is, these are burial boxes for bulls.

erm ok
.. How many remains of bulls found? ZERO.. Explanation on how these things could have been moved into the slots in the chamber? ZERO 20200305_121053.jpg maxresdefault.jpg serapium.jpg
 

CornbreadFed

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Messages
3,018
Reaction score
2,321
Age
30
Location
Nashville, TN
I'm totally in agreement that technology can be lost.. in-fact I believe it was a technologicaly advanced civilization that built the great pyramid.. and that technology is now lost... However ZERO evidence suggests that the Dynastic Egyptians ever had any of this technology.
There’s limited evidence of The Hanging Gardens of Babylon and much more things in general, but we don’t refute its origins. Look, there’s some truth to your argument that the Egyptian civilization that built the pyramids can be seen as “mysterious” due to it being a pre Bronze Age collapse civilization. We are discussing a civilization that occurred before an apocalyptic collapse in some places, so yes we will never have a firm grasp on the history of that era. What we do have are the pyramids though which means something built them. When society does collapse, I’m sure anything remotely related to the pyramids were picked clean first.
 
Last edited:

MatureDJ

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
10,832
Reaction score
4,479
The Book of Genesis refers to the Aliens as the Nephilim. And the extinction event is the great flood. People like to call that a fairy tale, but can't explain how the Sumerians and even the Mayans reference the same events in their respective histories.
It's because there was a great, sudden flood into the Black Sea as the last Ice Age ended:
 

corrector

Banned
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,279
Reaction score
3,553
Dude you are seriously uneducated on how complex, sophisticated, and the type of precision that went into building the Great Pyramid.

The reason why nobody tries to rebuild the Great Pyramid, is because it's Extremely Extremely difficult to do.
Exactly. Each stone put on top of each other would likely need at least four cranes to lift and put exactly into place, all the way to the top. That would be extremely expensive in terms of fuel, machine wear-and-tear, etc... Modern skyscrapers are more compatible to be built with modern tech rather than ancient structures. How could a people with more primitive tools be able to accomplish that if it's that difficult.

The answer is they had a more compatible technology to do those types of things, likely from the Nephilim, who also built similar structures in Peru. The Peru folklore was there were giants in the land that enslaved the human masses and eventually resorted to canabalism (ie eating the our "inferior human species" to them) when the land did not produce enough food from the human slaves to feed them, and they were very violent. They were wiped away from a flood. That narrative also checks out with other flood stories, and especially the Biblical account (ie Genesis 6 - the giants in the land, the book of Enoch), which portray an elder race comingled with women, produced an offspring of giants which wrecked havoc in the land. The elder race (ie fallen angels), made an exchange with the people at that time for technology (ie the types used to build the Pyramids), in exchange for wedding their daughters, and then the Nephilim were born.

It's likely this elder race had other bases elsewhere too, and a war had occurred in the distant past which made Venus and Mars uninhabitable and created the asteroid belt from another planet which was obliterated in the conflict. The Earth belonged to the humans, and their only claim to the last planet was to comingle and wed with the humans to create a hybrid offspring and try to salvage their reign over the last remaining planet in the system. What started as a benevolant technological exchange ended up in so much trouble that a flood was necessary in order to restore order to this planet, and re-insert humans as the domianat species.

However, there is a new threat. The Greys have a secret hybrid program where they are trying to replace humans in a stealth way, by abducting them and creating an army of hybrid human-grey aliens, abducting cows and extracting their blood to augment DNA, and the elder race will likely take advantage of them, and defeat them in a future UFO war (maybe not too much in the future as you are seeing all the disclosures from congress), and try to reinsert themselves like they did in the past in Genesis 6.

Concepts of this is found in Tim Alberinos's book, Birthright, which I purchased on Amazon. This guy has some really serious deep stuff.
 

corrector

Banned
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,279
Reaction score
3,553
Let's say the pyramids were built by the aliens or even an advanced ancient human civilization that is now completely lost to history. My questions is, if the builders were really so advanced, why would they build something that looks like this:



As opposed to something that looks like this:


The answer for this is that it may be made in such a way to extract energy from the Earth as a number of them were constructed in these leight-lines (sp?) so in a sense they could be made like an energy source. They are also made to withstand major Earthquakes and cataclyismic disasters. They withstood the flood or event that wiped out the ancient civilization that constructed it, yet those structures remained there. Can that be said the same for modern constructions? If an asteroid hit nearby those buildings or there was a nuclear weapon detonated nearby, which has a better chance of remaining intact, the Pyramid or the Skyscraper? 9/11 shows how weak the Twin Towers were when planes went into it. A Pyramid would still likely obliterate the plane while causing minimal damage to the Pyramid itself. The whole thing wouldn't collapse down like that.
 

soulforge

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
6,191
Reaction score
4,926
Exactly. Each stone put on top of each other would likely need at least four cranes to lift and put exactly into place, all the way to the top. That would be extremely expensive in terms of fuel, machine wear-and-tear, etc... Modern skyscrapers are more compatible to be built with modern tech rather than ancient structures. How could a people with more primitive tools be able to accomplish that if it's that difficult.

The answer is they had a more compatible technology to do those types of things, likely from the Nephilim, who also built similar structures in Peru. The Peru folklore was there were giants in the land that enslaved the human masses and eventually resorted to canabalism (ie eating the our "inferior human species" to them) when the land did not produce enough food from the human slaves to feed them, and they were very violent. They were wiped away from a flood. That narrative also checks out with other flood stories, and especially the Biblical account (ie Genesis 6 - the giants in the land, the book of Enoch), which portray an elder race comingled with women, produced an offspring of giants which wrecked havoc in the land. The elder race (ie fallen angels), made an exchange with the people at that time for technology (ie the types used to build the Pyramids), in exchange for wedding their daughters, and then the Nephilim were born.

It's likely this elder race had other bases elsewhere too, and a war had occurred in the distant past which made Venus and Mars uninhabitable and created the asteroid belt from another planet which was obliterated in the conflict. The Earth belonged to the humans, and their only claim to the last planet was to comingle and wed with the humans to create a hybrid offspring and try to salvage their reign over the last remaining planet in the system. What started as a benevolant technological exchange ended up in so much trouble that a flood was necessary in order to restore order to this planet, and re-insert humans as the domianat species.

However, there is a new threat. The Greys have a secret hybrid program where they are trying to replace humans in a stealth way, by abducting them and creating an army of hybrid human-grey aliens, abducting cows and extracting their blood to augment DNA, and the elder race will likely take advantage of them, and defeat them in a future UFO war (maybe not too much in the future as you are seeing all the disclosures from congress), and try to reinsert themselves like they did in the past in Genesis 6.

Concepts of this is found in Tim Alberinos's book, Birthright, which I purchased on Amazon. This guy has some really serious deep stuff.
There was a time some years ago, if someone mentioned Giants to me, I would have laughed about it, and called them crazy.

However overtime, I have come to realise that some of these mythologies, ancient tales and biblical stories are likely rooted in some truth.

Especially the stories about great floods, which are likely referring to a catastrophic climate event.

Even Egyptian mythology, describes the Gods as Giants. If you look at the Hieroglyphs, you will notice images of Gods who are bigger/giants in comparison to the regular people.

If anyone could move such huge pieces of rocks or build massive structures, with such accuracy, it would like be Giant.

That being said, I believe advanced technology could have been involved in these structures.

It's possible they had some mechanism the could soften limestone rock and then cut and shape it.
 

CornbreadFed

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Messages
3,018
Reaction score
2,321
Age
30
Location
Nashville, TN
There was a time some years ago, if someone mentioned Giants to me, I would have laughed about it, and called them crazy.

However overtime, I have come to realise that some of these mythologies, ancient tales and biblical stories are likely rooted in some truth.

Especially the stories about great floods, which are likely referring to a catastrophic climate event.

Even Egyptian mythology, describes the Gods as Giants. If you look at the Hieroglyphs, you will notice images of Gods who are bigger/giants in comparison to the regular people.

If anyone could move such huge pieces of rocks or build massive structures, with such accuracy, it would like be Giant.

That being said, I believe advanced technology could have been involved in these structures.

It's possible they had some mechanism the could soften limestone rock and then cut and shape it.
Where is the archeological evidence of Giants then?
 
Top