Hello Friend,

If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.

It will be the most efficient use of your time.

And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.

Thank you for visiting and have a great day!

What's the furthest you would go with PDA?

Boxer

Don Juan
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
167
Reaction score
3
Well I sort of made out with my girl at a community pool today. I felt kind of weird doing it. I just felt like going in for a quick kiss and it ended up being a 20 minute make out ending with a women interrupting saying "Just let me tell you something, as long as my children are here you two are stopping" I'm not going to lie. I'm not a fan of PDA. I only did it because everytime I pulled off she kept going back in for more.


What would a DJ's limits be on PDA?
 

Sir Psycho Sexy

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
453
Reaction score
15
Location
City of Angels
Anything more than a quick kiss to say hello or goodbye to a significant other I think is inappropriate.

Do whatever is comfortable for you.
 

Boxer

Don Juan
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
167
Reaction score
3
Sir Psycho Sexy said:
Anything more than a quick kiss to say hello or goodbye to a significant other I think is inappropriate.

Do whatever is comfortable for you.
That's how I feel. I feel kind of guilty for some reason though. All though I mean she could of stopped me though if she had a problem with it.
 

rushing dude 123

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Messages
932
Reaction score
19
Location
London
Honestly i do it all the time, every now and then you will get someone come up to you, like you just did or a whistle or whatever, but ah whatever.

Just kind of be a bit more discreet in some areas like if theres loads of kids all over the place and you're rubbing certain areas (NOT GOOD) lol. At the end of the night when you're at a lake or something and you go in for a good make out session, that in my opinion is kool.

However if you don't like it, then don't do it, it's whatever your comfortable with my friend.

ps: Also pulling out of a kiss and making a girl want more, is an art of a good kiss.
 

ARrocket

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
1,417
Reaction score
37
Location
East Coast USA
I live in the USA, and when I went to Mexico City, I was shocked at the PDA that was so commonplace. If you see a couple in that city under the age of 30 there's like a 90% chance they are in a heavy make-out session.
 

MyTeamSupreme

Don Juan
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
113
Reaction score
3
It blows my ****in mind that people still make out..If you're not squeezing/sucking bewbs after 15 seconds of kissing then you're doing it wrong
 

Boxer

Don Juan
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
167
Reaction score
3
MyTeamSupreme said:
It blows my ****in mind that people still make out..If you're not squeezing/sucking bewbs after 15 seconds of kissing then you're doing it wrong

In public????
 

fatdog

Don Juan
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
37
Reaction score
3
Boxer said:
Well I sort of made out with my girl at a community pool today. I felt kind of weird doing it. I just felt like going in for a quick kiss and it ended up being a 20 minute make out ending with a women interrupting saying "Just let me tell you something, as long as my children are here you two are stopping" I'm not going to lie. I'm not a fan of PDA. I only did it because everytime I pulled off she kept going back in for more.


What would a DJ's limits be on PDA?
Fvck those self-righteous mothers. I don't give a fvck about your kids. You don't want your children exposed to the world, lock em up in your basement. Fvck off ya sniveling cvnt.

Unless you were sticking your hands in your girl's panties or she was all up on your d1ck, that lady needs to STFU and get back in the kitchen.
 

5string

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 18, 2010
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
111
Location
Standing At The Crossroads
I have to disagree here. WTF are you doing this in public for? Why didnt you just take her to your car? Some feel offended by this stuff and rightfully so. If I had little kids, I wouldnt want them to see you playing tonsil hockey with some chick at a public pool.
 

fatdog

Don Juan
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
37
Reaction score
3
5string said:
I have to disagree here. WTF are you doing this in public for? Why didnt you just take her to your car? Some feel offended by this stuff and rightfully so. If I had little kids, I wouldnt want them to see you playing tonsil hockey with some chick at a public pool.
So basically, "I don't wanna deal with it, go away."

By that same token I could honestly say that I HATE kids. I don't have any of my own, and I sure as hell don't wanna deal with someone else's. Is it fair then to ask you to leave with your children because they offend me?

If what he was doing isn't illegal (last time I checked, making out in public isn't), then I don't see why he'd have to conform to your standards.
 

5string

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 18, 2010
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
111
Location
Standing At The Crossroads
fatdog said:
So basically, "I don't wanna deal with it, go away."

By that same token I could honestly say that I HATE kids. I don't have any of my own, and I sure as hell don't wanna deal with someone else's. Is it fair then to ask you to leave with your children because they offend me?

If what he was doing isn't illegal (last time I checked, making out in public isn't), then I don't see why he'd have to conform to your standards.
Actually yes. It would be fair to ask me to leave with my kids if they offended you. If they were annoying you in some way, even if it were legal, absolutely.
 

JustLurk

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
301
Reaction score
2
"
[....]

(2) solicits another to engage in sexual conduct with another person for compensation.

(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
[....]
(3) an image created, adapted, or modified to be the image of an identifiable child.

(i) In this section, "identifiable child" means a person, recognizable as an actual person by the person's face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature:

(1) who was younger than 18 years of age at the time the visual depiction was created, adapted, [...]
Sec. 43.25. SEXUAL PERFORMANCE BY A CHILD. (a) In this section:

(1) "Sexual performance" means any performance or part thereof that includes sexual conduct by a child younger than 18 years of age.

(2) "Sexual conduct" means sexual contact, actual or simulated sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, sexual bestiality, masturbation, sado-masochistic abuse, or lewd exhibition of the genitals, the anus, or any portion of the female breast below the top of the areola.

(3) "Performance" means any play, motion picture, photograph, dance, or other visual representation that can be exhibited before an audience of one or more persons.

(4) "Produce" with respect to a sexual performance includes any conduct that directly contributes to the creation or manufacture of the sexual performance.

(5) "Promote" means to procure, manufacture, issue, sell, give, provide, lend, mail, deliver, transfer, transmit, publish, distribute, circulate, disseminate, present, exhibit, or advertise or to offer or agree to do any of the above.


(6) "Simulated" means the explicit depiction of sexual conduct that creates the appearance of actual sexual conduct and during which a person engaging in the conduct exhibits any uncovered portion of the breasts, genitals, or buttocks.

(7) "Deviate sexual intercourse" and "sexual contact" have the meanings assigned by Section 43.01.

(b) A person commits an offense if, knowing the character and content thereof, he employs, authorizes, or induces a child younger than 18 years of age to engage in sexual conduct or a sexual performance. A parent or legal guardian or custodian of a child younger than 18 years of age commits an offense if he consents to the participation by the child in a sexual performance.

(c) An offense under Subsection (b) is a felony of the second degree, except that the offense is a felony of the first degree if the victim is younger than 14 years of age at the time the offense is committed.

(d) A person commits an offense if, knowing the character and content of the material, he produces, directs, or promotes a performance that includes sexual conduct by a child younger than 18 years of age.

(e) An offense under Subsection (d) is a felony of the third degree, except that the offense is a felony of the second degree if the victim is younger than 14 years of age at the time the offense is committed.

(f) It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under this section that:

(1) the defendant was the spouse of the child at the time of the offense;

(2) the conduct was for a bona fide educational, medical, psychological, psychiatric, judicial, law enforcement, or legislative purpose; or

(3) the defendant is not more than two years older than the child.

(g) When it becomes necessary for the purposes of this section or Section 43.26 to determine whether a child who participated in sexual conduct was younger than 18 years of age, the court or jury may make this determination by any of the following methods:

(1) personal inspection of the child;

(2) inspection of the photograph or motion picture that shows the child engaging in the sexual performance;

(3) oral testimony by a witness to the sexual performance as to the age of the child based on the child's appearance at the time;

(4) expert medical testimony based on the appearance of the child engaging in the sexual performance; or

(5) any other method authorized by law or by the rules of evidence at common law.

Added by Acts 1977, 65th Leg., p. 1035, ch. 381, Sec. 1, eff. June 10, 1977. Amended by Acts 1979, 66th Leg., p. 1976, ch. 779, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1979; Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 530, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1985; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1415, Sec. 22(b), eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1005, Sec. 4, 5 eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

Amended by:

Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 593, Sec. 1.20, eff. September 1, 2007.


Sec. 43.251. EMPLOYMENT HARMFUL TO CHILDREN. (a) In this section:

(1) "Child" means a person younger than 18 years of age.

(2) "Massage" has the meaning assigned to the term "massage therapy" by Section 455.001, Occupations Code.

(3) "Massage establishment" has the meaning assigned by Section 455.001, Occupations Code.

(4) "Nude" means a child who is:

(A) entirely unclothed; or

(B) clothed in a manner that leaves uncovered or visible through less than fully opaque clothing any portion of the breasts below the top of the areola of the breasts, if the child is female, or any portion of the genitals or buttocks.

(5) "Sexually oriented commercial activity" means a massage establishment, nude studio, modeling studio, love parlor, or other similar commercial enterprise the primary business of which is the offering of a service that is intended to provide sexual stimulation or sexual gratification to the customer.

(6) "Topless" means a female child clothed in a manner that leaves uncovered or visible through less than fully opaque clothing any portion of her breasts below the top of the areola.

(b) A person commits an offense if the person employs, authorizes, or induces a child to work:

(1) in a sexually oriented commercial activity; or

(2) in any place of business permitting, requesting, or requiring a child to work nude or topless.

(c) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.

Added by Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 783, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 31, 1987. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1420, Sec. 14.832, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.


Sec. 43.26. POSSESSION OR PROMOTION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. (a) A person commits an offense if:

(1) the person knowingly or intentionally possesses visual material that visually depicts a child younger than 18 years of age at the time the image of the child was made who is engaging in sexual conduct; and

(2) the person knows that the material depicts the child as described by Subdivision (1).

(b) In this section:

(1) "Promote" has the meaning assigned by Section 43.25.

(2) "Sexual conduct" has the meaning assigned by Section 43.25.

(3) "Visual material" means:

(A) any film, photograph, videotape, negative, or slide or any photographic reproduction that contains or incorporates in any manner any film, photograph, videotape, negative, or slide; or

(B) any disk, diskette, or other physical medium that allows an image to be displayed on a computer or other video screen and any image transmitted to a computer or other video screen by telephone line, cable, satellite transmission, or other method.

(c) The affirmative defenses provided by Section 43.25(f) also apply to a prosecution under this section.

(d) An offense under Subsection (a) is a felony of the third degree.

(e) A person commits an offense if:

(1) the person knowingly or intentionally promotes or possesses with intent to promote material described by Subsection (a)(1); and

(2) the person knows that the material depicts the child as described by Subsection (a)(1).

(f) A person who possesses visual material that contains six or more identical visual depictions of a child as described by Subsection (a)(1) is presumed to possess the material with the intent to promote the material.

(g) An offense under Subsection (e) is a felony of the second degree.

Added by Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 530, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1985. Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 361, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989; Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 968, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, Sec. 14.51, eff. Sept. 1, 1995; Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 933, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1415, Sec. 22(c), eff. Sept. 1, 1999.


Sec. 43.27. DUTY TO REPORT. (a) For purposes of this section, " visual material" has the meaning assigned by Section 43.26.

(b) A business that develops or processes visual material and determines that the material may be evidence of a criminal offense under this subchapter shall report the existence of the visual material to a local law enforcement agency.

Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1005, Sec. 6, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.


"
Nothing here I see that says it's illegal... But I think whoever owns the pool, whether a municipal employee or a private owner could ask you to leave though. EDIT: Somewhere in there were the public indecency laws but they were too long to fit in one post >.< If you want to find them I suggest google.
 

fatdog

Don Juan
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
37
Reaction score
3
5string said:
Actually yes. It would be fair to ask me to leave with my kids if they offended you. If they were annoying you in some way, even if it were legal, absolutely.
Well that's mighty noble of you. I find it hard to believe other parents would be as polite. Seems like parents (especially mothers) have this idea in their heads that just because they have kids somehow the world has to cater to them.

Alas, you are not one of those people and I commend you. Hats off good sir.
 

5string

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 18, 2010
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
111
Location
Standing At The Crossroads
fatdog said:
Well that's mighty noble of you. I find it hard to believe other parents would be as polite. Seems like parents (especially mothers) have this idea in their heads that just because they have kids somehow the world has to cater to them.

Alas, you are not one of those people and I commend you. Hats off good sir.
Agree. Many mommies have entitlement syndrome. Pitiful.
 

Just a Shot Away

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
648
Reaction score
19
Seeing two people make out in public is disgusting. Not only does it show a complete lack of class and etiquette, but such behavior in public indicates low moral character and immaturity. This is why you always see teenagers doing it.

I'm a taxi driver and sometimes my passengers will sometimes even go so far as to request to commit sex acts in the back of my car, and may not even ask other times (at which point I calmly educate them on appropriate public behavior.) It's amazing the lack of consideration that some people have. Nobody wants to see two people slobber all over each other's faces. Save that garbage for when you are alone.
 

Sturmblitz

Don Juan
Joined
Jul 3, 2010
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Just a Shot Away said:
Seeing two people make out in public is disgusting. Not only does it show a complete lack of class and etiquette, but such behavior in public indicates low moral character and immaturity. This is why you always see teenagers doing it.

I'm a taxi driver and sometimes my passengers will sometimes even go so far as to request to commit sex acts in the back of my car, and may not even ask other times (at which point I calmly educate them on appropriate public behavior.) It's amazing the lack of consideration that some people have. Nobody wants to see two people slobber all over each other's faces. Save that garbage for when you are alone.

I have to say I totally agree with you and all the other nay-sayers here. I'm not comfortable doing it because I think it's completely inconsiderate to those around you... Last year at lunch (my senior year of high school) this kid I know and his girlfriend sat at our table every day and wouldn't even participate in any conversation really, the majority of the time they would just stare at eachother and touch eachother and kiss and say **** like "I love you more! no, I love you more!" Like holy sh!t, get a goddam room. Nobody wants to see that, it makes everybody around you feel uncomfortable.
 

MyTeamSupreme

Don Juan
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
113
Reaction score
3
Boxer said:
In public????
Especially in public. If you're "making out" in a high traffic area then proceed to take your broad elsewhere. The car, the park, empty train car...
 
Top