Yeah 'cause that totally describes me.Danger said:In the US, It would only be silly to a person who is a misandrist or in the legion of white-knight douchebaggery.
I can't wait to hear about your extensive experience, my 30 year old friend.In my experience, I have seen plenty of men get raped by the system in NY. Somehow I bet that California is not any different.
Here's a wakeup call for you, pal. In my decade as a lawyer I've realized that ALL COURTS consider EVERYONE to be "wallets." The family court has, at the very bottom, only one desire: to make sure the state doesn't pay for dumbass's kids. That's it. I'll repeat that one. The court has one goal, and that's to make sure that the government finds someone other than itself to pay for all the expensive children running around. It doesn't care who, or how. If you have any money and can in any way be connected to a child, the court will try to make you pay for the child. It doesn't care if you're a man, a woman, or a horse. If you have money, and can be in any way legally connected to any kid crapping his pants anywhere in the country, the court will hunt you down and try to wring as much money from you as possible.What metric exactly are you measuring to determine what is "even"? You really suggest that men are not considered "wallets" to family courts?
That's the system, my boy. Deal with it.