AttackFormation
Master Don Juan
So I was thinking about some blog or forum by women about how no matter what a woman does, men will say it's wrong, so woman should just not care and do what they want. Basically the extremes are if they have sex with men they're cheap used up wh0res, if they don't have sex they're stuck-up prudes, you get the point.
My thoughts are:
1) Congruence and character is what's important, just like it is for men. I personally don't blame women for wanting to be with and fvcking men they're actually attracted to/aroused by, I just don't like the manipulation and deception about it. Just like I don't have a problem with people and athletes taking steroids in itself, but rather so the bullsh!t denial and blatant lies about it.
2) There are certain biological realities we live with. These things turn us on or off to something without us really having control over it, much like sexual arousal in general. For example, this means if you show tendencies of being unfaithful like wanting to fvck a new guy every week OR at the other extreme a girl who is a "virgin" in name only but keeps it technically to manipulate men better and may very well be unfaithful in the future, you have to face reality.
Which is that although many will be glad to have sex with you, most men will not look forward to giving their resources (time/emotion/etc.) to or starting a family with you. Many will even be turned off to having sex with you.
Another such reality is that for a healthy society you need healthy humans and vice versa. It just so happens to be the case that healthy humans are best and most numerously created by good families and that growing up in a sh!tty family reliably leads to bad things happening.
3) I do not blame women for having sex. I don't think a society based on never having anything but one lifetime sexual partner is feasible, nor even necessarily desirable.
I ask myself, in a hypothetical future when humans have an indefinitely long lifespan will it work to have such a value system? because stuff like sexual partner count ramps up over time and can never be decreased, no the value system cannot strictly be the same, and so I think it must be evolved even now. Just like we do for ourselves on this board, a woman's character has to be the top priority. In the end it is our destiny to evolve beyond only caring about base animal properties of visceral alpha/beta if we want to be a socially functioning species.
What do YOU think?
My thoughts are:
1) Congruence and character is what's important, just like it is for men. I personally don't blame women for wanting to be with and fvcking men they're actually attracted to/aroused by, I just don't like the manipulation and deception about it. Just like I don't have a problem with people and athletes taking steroids in itself, but rather so the bullsh!t denial and blatant lies about it.
2) There are certain biological realities we live with. These things turn us on or off to something without us really having control over it, much like sexual arousal in general. For example, this means if you show tendencies of being unfaithful like wanting to fvck a new guy every week OR at the other extreme a girl who is a "virgin" in name only but keeps it technically to manipulate men better and may very well be unfaithful in the future, you have to face reality.
Which is that although many will be glad to have sex with you, most men will not look forward to giving their resources (time/emotion/etc.) to or starting a family with you. Many will even be turned off to having sex with you.
Another such reality is that for a healthy society you need healthy humans and vice versa. It just so happens to be the case that healthy humans are best and most numerously created by good families and that growing up in a sh!tty family reliably leads to bad things happening.
3) I do not blame women for having sex. I don't think a society based on never having anything but one lifetime sexual partner is feasible, nor even necessarily desirable.
I ask myself, in a hypothetical future when humans have an indefinitely long lifespan will it work to have such a value system? because stuff like sexual partner count ramps up over time and can never be decreased, no the value system cannot strictly be the same, and so I think it must be evolved even now. Just like we do for ourselves on this board, a woman's character has to be the top priority. In the end it is our destiny to evolve beyond only caring about base animal properties of visceral alpha/beta if we want to be a socially functioning species.
What do YOU think?
