What if human artifacts & foot prints were found alongside dinosaurs

[twentee]

yeah, they are bogus, that's why they don't "fit".

 

[Fatal Jay]

So hold on a minute:



We have a human artifact which was found in layers of rock dated back 100 million years, and also carbon dated that far. In other words, the age of artifact is confirmed.


But, this human artifact does not fit into the theory of evolution!


Thus, the artifact is crap!



I understand you people right?


I'm not taking sides here, favoring one over the other. I just want truth. It seems to me if there is an artifact disproving theory of evolution, the proper thing is to question the theory of evolution, and not the artifact that does not fit into the theory of evolution. Because the artifact is just that, it lays there in rock, waiting to be discovered and carbon dated. But discovering it, carbon dating it, and then ignoring it???


Hold on a minute.


If you ignore an artifact like that who are you lying to?


It appears to me you are lying only to yourself by ignoring these artifacts.

See you got it?

I wonder why that vagina, named voice couldn't have. Since science is his religion, dumb a$$ doesn't even know that science origins started off as being the study of "The creator's creations"

 

[Voice]

See you got it?

I wonder why that vagina, named voice couldn't have. Since science is his religion, dumb a$$ doesn't even know that science origins started off as being the study of "The creator's creations"

Science isn't a religion because religion requires blind faith. Science requires skepticism and evidence. In other words, it is the study of objective reality. When people find that objective reality AKA science doesn't coincide with their previous held beliefs, they rationalize "science" as just another religion. In other words just as you think Islam or Hunduism are false religions, you think science is as well.

Let me ask you something, bro. If you are sick and have cancer and you could only visit one of the following who would you visit?

A. physician
B. Witch Doctor
C. priest

One of these uses science, evidence and objective reality to save your life. The other 2 use religion and blind faith.

 

[Fatal Jay]

What is the evidence of evolution, there is none, scientist have gone back and forth with the missing link of mankind, because there is no missing link.

You just as much of a contradiction that you claim religion is.

 

[DanZy]

There is no evidence of evolution? Seriously are you retarded?
There's no point arguing with a person like you, you simply don't see logic. So you believe the Earth is only a few thousand years old, that men walked amongst dinosaurs, that some "god" created everything etc. Come on dude, wake up and see some reason. Do you also believe that the Earth is flat?

 

[Voice]

What is the evidence of evolution, there is none, scientist have gone back and forth with the missing link of mankind, because there is no missing link.

You just as much of a contradiction that you claim religion is.

You're hopeless dude.

http://books.google.com/books/about/On_the_Origin_of_Species_1859.html?id=RdIp_XRopbcC

You don't fill gaps in human knowledge with the supernatural. To say 'we don't know therefore God did it' is lazy and a complete logical fallacy.

 

[Deep Dish]

Fatal Jay:
What is the evidence of evolution, there is none.

Are you…

A) willfully ignorant, or
B) trolling?

In the words of evolutionary biologist Jerry Coyne, in the first link of my most recent post:

Among genuine scientists, there is not the slightest doubt about the truth of these ideas. In contrast to Egnor’s claim, the evidence for all of them is not only strong but copious—so much so that evolution has graduated from a scientific theory to a scientific fact.

My recent book, Why Evolution Is True, gives 230 pages of evidence for evolution—evidence from many areas of biology, including the fossil record, anatomy, biogeography and molecular biology. My main problem in writing the book was not deciding what to present, but what to leave out; I could easily have made it three times longer without even beginning to exhaust the data. There is so much evidence and so many kinds of evidence that one would have to be either willfully ignorant or blinded by faith to think otherwise. (I leave it to the reader to judge to which category [Fatal Jay] belongs.)

http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/12/evolution-creation-proof-opinions-darwin_0212_jerry_coyne.html​

 

[goundra]

the glove was planted by the LA cops, most likely. Also, Johnny had OJ doing hand exercises during that entire year, to make his hand muscles and tendons larger, so that the glove would seem to be undersized. Such a thing can be done, with a rubber ball and rubber bands and a box of sand, or even with just isometrics.

 

[backseatjuan]

Well if it's going this way, then I also would add that these fossil evidence don't fit into any religion as well and blow creation out of water.


So we have fossil evidence that suggest man (or other humanoids) have lived alongside with dinosaurs.

This does not fit into theory of evolution.

This does not fit into religious creation.

By the way, the fossils are real, you can not fake carbon dating, and you can not place fossils into layers of rock.

 

[DanZy]

Well if it's going this way, then I also would add that these fossil evidence don't fit into any religion as well and blow creation out of water.


So we have fossil evidence that suggest man (or other humanoids) have lived alongside with dinosaurs.

This does not fit into theory of evolution.

This does not fit into religious creation.

By the way, the fossils are real, you can not fake carbon dating, and you can not place fossils into layers of rock.

Did you even read what Deep Dish wrote? Man did not walk among dinosaurs, seriously we'd be more than useless in such a world.

 

[backbreaker]

this is like watching a drunk cripple fight lol

common sense, the fact that humans in any way shape or form, without the aide of pretty mjuch current technology and **** even with it, i don't know, could not surivive in a world where 8 ton 40 foot T rex with the bite force of 8,000 pounds per square inch lived.

another reason your piont is silly is beucase your time line is 15 million years off.. dinos died out 65 millino years ago. even if we were around 50 million years ago whcih we weren't we still would have missed dinos by 15 million years.

nor could we find enough vegitation life to survive with all the huge plant eaters around there wasn't enough food as it is.

 

[Burroughs]

wait

hang on

didn't the autobots build the dinobots? :crackup: :crackup: :crackup: :crackup:

 

[PlayHer Man]

Humans living AT THE TIME of Dinosaurs?

Good luck with that: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5Co3A3fLBo

Even with modern technology we wouldn't have much of a chance considering all the species and their SIZE.

Common sense people. Use it.