What guns, if any, do you own?

[EyeBRollin]

Your confusing bullets is what causes the circles.

1. Guns are the great equalizer. So you are wrong here. Or do you think women can hold off a rapist?

2. https://www.naturalnews.com/039752_mass_shootings_psychiatric_drugs_antidepressants.html

3. I already read the federalist papers. The founders had a distrust for standing armies and were smart enough to understand the people had the exclusive right to defend their freedom from the state.

1. Correct. How else did white men keep their larger slave population in line?

2. Of course you cite a right wing source that misses the larger point: if a Trump loving terrorist wants to commit a mass murder he will have a much easier time with a gun than other weapons.

3. The founders couldn’t agree on much without southerners retaining their right to keep slaves in line.

 

[EyeBRollin]

1. The 1% who were slave owners? Probably by feeding them and taking care of them. But you are confusing bullets again. This is what leftists do, muddy the waters and use feelings to push their agenda. Guns are an inherent part of the individuals right not to be assaulted.

2. The data is the data, regardless of the messenger. But since you cannot attack the message, I see why you go for the messenger.

3. They agreed on gun rights and the security of a free state. But if you want to immerse in feelz that you never experienced from 160 years ago, have fun with that.

1. Yes, because when slaves outnumber slave owners 50 to 1, bribes of food were enough to quell revolts. Get a clue, dude. Guns were written into the constitution to protect slave owners.

2. All data has to be interpreted with understanding of context. Data says white men are most likely to be mass murderers. You agree with that?

3. Sorry bro, that’s not the truth. You need to brush up on your history. Try some primary sources instead of Fox News.

 

[EyeBRollin]

1. Guns were written into the Constitution so they did not have a King George repeat. Security of a free state. The 2nd amendment says nothing of slavery. King George even ordered guns to be confiscated. But if you want to focus on hating White men, so be it. Even though only 1% owned slaves.

2. Provide the data and lets take a look. Still does nothing to affect that SSRIs account for most mass shootings, after gang warfare. But if you want to focus on hate for White men, so be it.

3. It is a fact. As shown by what I said in statement 1, when King George tried to confiscate weaponry before the revolutionary war started. If you have data, by all means provide it. Not that you ever do. But if you want to focus on slavery and hating White men, so be it.

I am seeing a theme here about slavery and you hating White men. It seems to color your entire view of history.

I am understanding why you never share your sources, for fear they may be scrutinized.....

Slavery was the most significant basis for this country’s wealth and structure of government. You wish to edit out the truth with your warped view of revisionist history because the truth makes you feel uncomfortable. You lack context which is why your arguments are always parroted right wing talking points.

1. Your explanation is incorrect. The Second Amendment was written at the request of slave owning men, for right to put down slave revolts.

2. Data is nothing without context. Data says strict gun laws = fewer mass murders.

3. You refuse to accept the truth. Everything in this country, including our government structure, was built to appease the institution of slavery.

 

[EyeBRollin]

What source do you have for that claim? That slaves produced the significant wealth today? Is this why everything for you revolves around slavery in the US and hatred for White men?

1. LOL, King George tried to take away guns, fact. The colonies recognized this would have meqnt a failed revolution, fact. The 2nd amendment even states this. Any disagreement is upon you to prove.

2. Red herring which Tyrannical rules love. Data says black felons kill far more than the SSRI induced mass murders. Point is, the answer is not to reduce freedom and self-defense.

3. You will have to source that one. But we all know you won't.

Predictable abscence if specifics and critical thought. Our culture doesn’t revolve around slavery, our history does.

Hatred for white men is your predictable straw men. Are you self conscious of the fact that mass murders are Trump-loving white nationalists?

1. Bullshyt. Where in the second Amendment does it mention King George confiscation?

2. Freedom and guns have nothing to do with each other.

3. The United States Senate.

 

[EyeBRollin]

Our history is too massive to say it revolves around anything specific like that. Your thoughts certainly endlessly revolve around it though.

1. Right next to quelling slaves. ;-)
1b. In seriousness, "security of a free state" is in reference to a ruler who does not want freedom.

2. No? Tell that to the people who died in the Revolutionary war or the Civil war.

3. That is not a source to back up your argument, that is a Government body. Try again.

Disregarding over 60% of American history does not help your position but I’m sure it makes you feel better.

1. No, it’s not. Repeating a lie over and over doesn’t make it true.

2. The revolutionary war and civil war were not fought on the basis of gun rights.

3. It’s a powerful government body that’s structure was conceived to retain the power of slave states.

 

[Billtx49]

Thread has gone off topic. Closed