My Name is Nobody
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2007
- Messages
- 2,153
- Reaction score
- 13
Going out to dinner and a few drinks will cost at least 50 dollars. Went to the Pub and had 2 beers Saturday, the b@stards charged 12 dollars.
Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.
Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?
You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.
Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
In dc...for a STUDIO a person can pay about $1400 a month. I am talking here a studio.Omen said:Ok, first off, if I am not SERIOUS with a woman, I am sure as heck not going to be traveling with her. But yeah it's going to cost you money if you travel, but I dont think many guys just randomly travel with someone they aren't serious with. In my mind that is money well wasted.
D.C.. Yeah, I hear D.C is crazy for cost of living. I am in a place where the cost of living is one of the lowest in the US. I can tell you that my parents house with pool, finished basement and a total of 6,000sqft would be a couple of million in D.C. You can get that for under 450,000 where I am at.
We also dont have the glitz and glamor of a big city,so you dont spend money like you would maybe elsewhere.
I took a girl out once for frozen custard cause she never had it, and she had only had ice cream. She loved it, and was like... Wow, thanks for giving me an insight on this stuff. COST ME $4 FOR THE BOTH
And that is the thing. You have to define YOUR type of lifestyle, and determine where you live as well. I talked to a girl in DC and told her she was crazy for spending what she was on a place she was renting. She said something like $1,200 on a condo. For $1,400/month I can get a 5 bedroom house with 3.5 bath with over 3,000sqft.
She told me they spend their money on the lifestyle. We spend more of our money on housing, and dont worry as much about the lifestyle like D.C, Denver, or any other place would be like.
I guess it is a trade off.
And that is why I dont live in D.CLatinoman said:In dc...for a STUDIO a person can pay about $1400 a month. I am talking here a studio.
The travel part was just an extreme. But even to go out to eat and get three or so drinks...you are going to pay about $50 minimum for YOU.
The point I am trying to make is that it costs money to enjoy life. Gas prices alone are a killer. Took me about $60 to fill out my vehicle. That's a lot of money. Can you imagine doing that once a week? That's $240 in a month, just in gasoline.
You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.
Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.
Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.
Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.
Yeah that sounds about right. I'm about an hour north of D.C. and my 1,100 sq.ft. town home (read: row home) with lopsided windows cost me $260,000.Omen said:I talked to a girl in DC and told her she was crazy for spending what she was on a place she was renting. She said something like $1,200 on a condo. For $1,400/month I can get a 5 bedroom house with 3.5 bath with over 3,000sqft.
WOW! I was told that you have to choose what you enjoy. The lifestyle of a place like that, or prefer to have the house.Luthor Rex said:Yeah that sounds about right. I'm about an hour north of D.C. and my 1,100 sq.ft. town home (read: row home) with lopsided windows cost me $260,000.
I live in the "poor" part of town. But get it out of your head that I'm the poor part of some upscale neighborhood. Most of my neighbors are blue collar workers. No yuppies here!
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
Reset, like I told Joe, don't listen to him. Latinoman thinks he's got all the answers. Hah. I can see in this thread there are quite a few of us who think it's "superficial" to judge a guy based on where and who he lives with. And props to all of them for having enough smarts and WISDOM to realize that. You're absolutely right, a chick who will judge you based on where you live, saves you a lot of time. Women like that are good for nothing, except if she's hot, then she's only good for a good hard f*cking.....hehe.reset said:If a chick doesn't see I'm on my way to getting my own pad, a better job etc, and would judge me on that, then we both saved each other a lot of time.
This has really bugged me. No I don't "live at home" I pay rent etc. like I explained. It's a roomate situation. But yeah, working towards my own independence. It's nothing to be f'ing ashamed of. Rents in my area are through the roof as it is.
Doesn't mean I don't have my **** together.
And why's that? Elaborate. Or maybe I can try to guess. Is it because the man is supposed to "chump out" where she'll be thinking along the lines of her sweety being able to provide and take care of the mooching, waste that she is?Latinoman said:Fact is...there is NOT positive way of seeing this from a woman's perspective.
Really?? I could've swore I lived in Europe. *strokes his chin in confusion*Latinoman said:Another thing...this is the U.S...not Italy.
Who say's you can't live at home with a parent(s) and still be in a Long Term Relationship? It works fine. The only thing is you lack privacy, but it still can be done.Latinoman said:If you are NOT independent...then you are not in a position to be in a LTR. Not when you are in your upper 20s.
Which is sad, and shows you how backwards, distorted, and f*cked up the U.S. is. Think about something for a second, ok? The United States is basically the only country where this exists. All of Europe and for the most part elsewhere, does not share this backwards, distorted, superficial mindset. Hmm, so that goes to show you the problem here is the United States. It goes to show you the terrible shape it is in, in terms of values and morals.Latinoman said:Dude...that's the way it is in this country. Women see it as a negative.
To a good souled woman, a "dependent" man as you put it, will mean nothing to her.Latinoman said:And why would a woman prefer a DEPENDENT man when there are plenty of INDEPENDENT men out there?
I think it's the perception of things rather than what may actually be happening. A good friend of mine in highschool was required by his parents to make his own meals, do his own laundry and had to start paying rent at 18. They were trying to teach him self-reliance which is fine.edger said:And why's that? Elaborate. Or maybe I can try to guess. Is it because the man is supposed to "chump out" where she'll be thinking along the lines of her sweety being able to provide and take care of the mooching, waste that she is?
What is backwards is someone who thinks that a majority opinion is also a correct opinion. Ahh... the soft tyranny of social conformity...edger said:Which is sad, and shows you how backwards, distorted, and f*cked up the U.S. is. Think about something for a second, ok? The United States is basically the only country where this exists. All of Europe and for the most part elsewhere, does not share this backwards, distorted, superficial mindset. Hmm, so that goes to show you the problem here is the United States. It goes to show you the terrible shape it is in, in terms of values and morals.
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
Well...I am just telling you how women see a man OLDER than 25 living with his parents. It is what it is. If you don't want to see that...then you are blind.edger said:And why's that? Elaborate. Or maybe I can try to guess. Is it because the man is supposed to "chump out" where she'll be thinking along the lines of her sweety being able to provide and take care of the mooching, waste that she is?
Maybe you should move to Europe.Really?? I could've swore I lived in Europe. *strokes his chin in confusion*
At least Europeans have their heads on straight, have enough wisdom, and aren't superficial pieces of useless sh*t like a lot of Americans.
What you just described is pathetic and it is NOT a DJ way of doing things. You live at your parents...you are NOT the man of the house. The MAN is your father (or mother).Who say's you can't live at home with a parent(s) and still be in a Long Term Relationship? It works fine. The only thing is you lack privacy, but it still can be done.
This is what is wrong. A thing that I learn when I lived alone is the HUGE responsibility of keeping the bills paid on time and keeping the home in order. Making sure things were fixed and not let them break down. Also, the legal responsibilities too.And what about the guy that makes enough money to have his own pad, but would still rather live with a parent(s)?
All those countries come to the U.S. begging for our help and way of live. We produce more BILLIONAIRES than any other country. We have the best PhDs and graduate programs in the World. No offense...but that's what makes us GREAT. And if you don't like it...you can always move abroad.edger said:Which is sad, and shows you how backwards, distorted, and f*cked up the U.S. is. Think about something for a second, ok? The United States is basically the only country where this exists. All of Europe and for the most part elsewhere, does not share this backwards, distorted, superficial mindset.
What is so "valuable" and "moralistic" about DEPENDING on and taking advantage of your parents? What is so terrible about wanting to be INDEPENDENT? What is so bad about a woman choosing an INDEPENDENT man over one that lives with dad and mom? What is so bad about a woman choosing a man that ALREADY is considered the MAN of his home than one that delegates that authority to his dad or mom?Hmm, so that goes to show you the problem here is the United States. It goes to show you the terrible shape it is in, in terms of values and morals.
Don't kid yourself...over 90% of the women in the U.S. want a man that is INDEPENDENT (especially if that man is over 25).To a good souled woman, a "dependent" man as you put it, will mean nothing to her.
It is bad.Luthor Rex said:I think it's the perception of things rather than what may actually be happening. A good friend of mine in highschool was required by his parents to make his own meals, do his own laundry and had to start paying rent at 18. They were trying to teach him self-reliance which is fine.
Most people though, seem to have it in their heads that if you 'live at home' then your mother waits on you hand and foot. Now, when I lived at home my mother did do my laundry (unlike my friend above); but I wouldn't ever have thought of her as some kind of domestic servant.
The point I'm trying to make here with the above is that I think it's people's perception of the situation and not necessarily the reality of it that is good or bad. I think if Joe explained he was the breadwinner then women won't think he's some kind of slacker. At the same time if he was a rock star and still lived with mom I'm sure most women wouldn't care.
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.