Maximus Rex
Banned
FONT="Georgia"]We're ****ed as a society and as a country. Y'all laughed and teased in when I said that homo movement in America was out of control. Here's further proof. I'm try to edit this down and add in my comments. To read this ****ery in it's entirety:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/magazi...wanted=all[/FONT]
The night before Susan and Rob allowed their son to go to preschool in a dress, they sent an e-mail to parents of his classmates. Alex, they wrote, “has been gender-fluid for as long as we can remember, and at the moment he is equally passionate about and identified with soccer players and princesses, superheroes and ballerinas (not to mention lava and unicorns, dinosaurs and glitter rainbows).”
Clearly the "daddy is a b....made individual because no MAN ALLOWS HIS SON TO WEAR A DRESS AND ACT LIKE A GIRL! Also this an extreme example of feminism. The wife without a doubt runs this household.
They explained that Alex had recently become inconsolable about his parents’ ban on wearing dresses beyond dress-up time. After consulting their pediatrician, a psychologist and parents of other gender-nonconforming children, they concluded that “the important thing was to teach him not to be ashamed of who he feels he is.”
What happened was the dad should have nipped this **** in the IMMEDIATELY, telling the f..... ass lil boy that he wasn't a girl and acting and pretending to a girl isn't acceptable behavior. Instead they find a quack pediatrician and a psychologist along with parents of some f..... ass youngsters to co-sign this bull****. What this little boy needed was a good ass whoopin'
When Alex was 4, he pronounced himself “a boy and a girl,” but in the two years since, he has been fairly clear that he is simply a boy who sometimes likes to dress and play in conventionally feminine ways.
What's going to happened when this kid gets to elementary school and he/she/it gets around regular boys. You guessed it, he/she/it is going to get the ****ed teased out him/her. But who's going to be wrong, not parents for allowing this nonsense, but the kids who's doing the bullying who not teaching their kids "tolerance." Never mind the fact that children shouldn't be exposing to other transvestite children with early signs of f.. proclivities.
By the mid-20th century, doctors were trying “corrective therapy” to extinguish atypical gender behaviors. The goal was preventing children from becoming gay or transgender, a term for those who feel they were born in the wrong body.
More techniques need to explored before we allow these kids to became sexual deviants.
Many parents and clinicians now reject corrective therapy, making this the first generation to allow boys to openly play and dress (to varying degrees) in ways previously restricted to girls — to exist in what one psychologist called “that middle space” between traditional boyhood and traditional girlhood.
This is a direct result of feminist and homo movements. Ladies, you like complaining about the "lack of real men," let this **** take a hold and see what **** is going to be like in twenty years. Like black men in regards to black women, you're going to "**** it because there won't be any real men around. It's some sad and scary ****.
they fear the wrong parenting decision could devastate their child’s social or emotional well-being. The fact that there is still substantial disagreement among prominent psychological professionals about whether to squelch unconventional behavior or support it makes those decisions even more wrenching.
Because they know this is wrong and is inherently ****ed up.
Many of the parents who allow their children to occupy that “middle space” were socially liberal even before they had a pink boy, quick to defend gay rights and women’s equality and to question the confines of traditional masculinity and femininity.
And this is the crux of the matter. It's cool to raise a son to suck ****, be a supplicant in front of a b.... and all of this other liberal bull****, but to raise embrace and be proud of his masculinity, to teach how to deal with women, to him lead, how to dress, proper manners, and what's to be expected of him as a man. Ohhh no. That's wrong, misogynistic, and conforms to norms of the oppressive patriarchy. Get the **** out of here.
But when their sons upend conventional norms, even they feel disoriented. How could my own child’s play — something ordinarily so joyous to watch — stir up such discomfort? And why does it bother me that he wants to wear a dress?
Because it's wrong. The same why allowing your child to beat up weaker children and trying to **** other little girls is wrong.
“It’s hard to put a finger on why gender identity makes such a difference to our sense of who a person is, but it does."
Despite you're liberal social views at the end of the day, you want a son who'll play baseball, watch wrestling, date girls, possibly go into the military, (wait liberal loathe the military,) go to college, get a job, get married to a nice and give you grandkids. Now you're faced with the reality that you or husband why have the f... gene, your son is going to be not on a homo, but a flamboyant one, lacking bass in his voice, wearing only briefs and body in that travesty called a "pride parade," and he'll be in f.. orgies getting trains ran on him. **** is overwhelming.
Studies estimate that 2 percent to 7 percent of boys under age 12 regularly display “cross-gender” behaviors, though very few wish to actually be a girl.
The studies on what happens in adulthood to boys who strayed from gender norms all have methodological limitations, but they suggest that although plenty of gay men don’t start out as pink boys, 60 to 80 percent of pink boys do eventually become gay men. The rest grow up to either become heterosexual men or become women by taking hormones and maybe having surgery. Gender-nonconforming behavior of girls, however, is rarely studied, in part because departures from traditional femininity are so pervasive and accepted.
Again more proof that the homos want access to the youth (and their "*******s,") of America. If you start them young indoctrinate with them with this bull**** at an early age, they'll come to see male-to-male fellatio and male-to-male sodomy as something as normal. This is what Hilter'em was doing with the Hilter youth. This is some ****ed up insidious ****.
By age 4, he sometimes sobbed when he saw himself in the mirror wearing pants, saying he felt ugly.
This is so sad. It's one thing for a little girl to what to be pretty, but a little boy? Again, I blame the father for allowing to son to not only engage but entertain this bull****. Why didn't the father stress to the son the right and goodness of being a male. There's too much b....ness going on in this family. I wouldn't be surprised if the father was a half-a-homo his damn self.
In the 19th century, both boys and girls often wore dresses and long hair until they were 7. Colors weren’t gendered consistently. At times pink was considered a strong, and therefore masculine, color, while blue was considered delicate. Children’s clothes for both sexes included lace, ruffles, flowers and kittens.
What this is neglecting to tell you is that boys weren't running around acting like girls.
By age 10, most pink boys drop much of their unconventional appearance and activities, either because they outgrow the desire or subsume it.
The studies on what happens in adulthood to boys who strayed from gender norms all have methodological limitations, but they suggest that although plenty of gay men don’t start out as pink boys, 60 to 80 percent of pink boys do eventually become gay men. The rest grow up to either become heterosexual men or become women by taking hormones and maybe having surgery.
By age 4, he sometimes sobbed when he saw himself in the mirror wearing pants, saying he felt ugly.
This is some sad and disturbing ****. Little boys shouldn't concerned with being "ugly." That's a preoccupation for little girls. Again I blame the father not instilling in this young boy that it's cool to be a man and being a male is something that celebrated.
but the gay rights movement has made a big difference. Moreover, the visibility of transgender people — be it running for office or tangoing on “Dancing With the Stars” — has provided an opening for those who fall between genders. many school districts and local governments now ban discrimination based on gender identity or expression.
Again we see the malignant cancer that calls itself the "gay rights movement." We should of seen the forest for the trees concerning these sexual deviants. It wasn't about jobs, housing, or being able to walk the streets without worrying about about an ass whoopin'. It's about being approach heterosexuals (especially men with impunity,)
It's about forcing their ****ed up lifestyle upon the masses. It about normalizing their deviant and ****ed up behavior to a younger generation. If this happens, the sexual predators will have political momentum to lower the age of consent that will give them access to young and boys girls, and finally, it's about blurry the gender roles to the point where they no longer exist. Where what we know now as being a male is far distant memory. This is the f..g's long term agenda.[/B]
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/magazi...wanted=all[/FONT]
The night before Susan and Rob allowed their son to go to preschool in a dress, they sent an e-mail to parents of his classmates. Alex, they wrote, “has been gender-fluid for as long as we can remember, and at the moment he is equally passionate about and identified with soccer players and princesses, superheroes and ballerinas (not to mention lava and unicorns, dinosaurs and glitter rainbows).”
Clearly the "daddy is a b....made individual because no MAN ALLOWS HIS SON TO WEAR A DRESS AND ACT LIKE A GIRL! Also this an extreme example of feminism. The wife without a doubt runs this household.
They explained that Alex had recently become inconsolable about his parents’ ban on wearing dresses beyond dress-up time. After consulting their pediatrician, a psychologist and parents of other gender-nonconforming children, they concluded that “the important thing was to teach him not to be ashamed of who he feels he is.”
What happened was the dad should have nipped this **** in the IMMEDIATELY, telling the f..... ass lil boy that he wasn't a girl and acting and pretending to a girl isn't acceptable behavior. Instead they find a quack pediatrician and a psychologist along with parents of some f..... ass youngsters to co-sign this bull****. What this little boy needed was a good ass whoopin'
When Alex was 4, he pronounced himself “a boy and a girl,” but in the two years since, he has been fairly clear that he is simply a boy who sometimes likes to dress and play in conventionally feminine ways.
What's going to happened when this kid gets to elementary school and he/she/it gets around regular boys. You guessed it, he/she/it is going to get the ****ed teased out him/her. But who's going to be wrong, not parents for allowing this nonsense, but the kids who's doing the bullying who not teaching their kids "tolerance." Never mind the fact that children shouldn't be exposing to other transvestite children with early signs of f.. proclivities.
By the mid-20th century, doctors were trying “corrective therapy” to extinguish atypical gender behaviors. The goal was preventing children from becoming gay or transgender, a term for those who feel they were born in the wrong body.
More techniques need to explored before we allow these kids to became sexual deviants.
Many parents and clinicians now reject corrective therapy, making this the first generation to allow boys to openly play and dress (to varying degrees) in ways previously restricted to girls — to exist in what one psychologist called “that middle space” between traditional boyhood and traditional girlhood.
This is a direct result of feminist and homo movements. Ladies, you like complaining about the "lack of real men," let this **** take a hold and see what **** is going to be like in twenty years. Like black men in regards to black women, you're going to "**** it because there won't be any real men around. It's some sad and scary ****.
they fear the wrong parenting decision could devastate their child’s social or emotional well-being. The fact that there is still substantial disagreement among prominent psychological professionals about whether to squelch unconventional behavior or support it makes those decisions even more wrenching.
Because they know this is wrong and is inherently ****ed up.
Many of the parents who allow their children to occupy that “middle space” were socially liberal even before they had a pink boy, quick to defend gay rights and women’s equality and to question the confines of traditional masculinity and femininity.
And this is the crux of the matter. It's cool to raise a son to suck ****, be a supplicant in front of a b.... and all of this other liberal bull****, but to raise embrace and be proud of his masculinity, to teach how to deal with women, to him lead, how to dress, proper manners, and what's to be expected of him as a man. Ohhh no. That's wrong, misogynistic, and conforms to norms of the oppressive patriarchy. Get the **** out of here.
But when their sons upend conventional norms, even they feel disoriented. How could my own child’s play — something ordinarily so joyous to watch — stir up such discomfort? And why does it bother me that he wants to wear a dress?
Because it's wrong. The same why allowing your child to beat up weaker children and trying to **** other little girls is wrong.
“It’s hard to put a finger on why gender identity makes such a difference to our sense of who a person is, but it does."
Despite you're liberal social views at the end of the day, you want a son who'll play baseball, watch wrestling, date girls, possibly go into the military, (wait liberal loathe the military,) go to college, get a job, get married to a nice and give you grandkids. Now you're faced with the reality that you or husband why have the f... gene, your son is going to be not on a homo, but a flamboyant one, lacking bass in his voice, wearing only briefs and body in that travesty called a "pride parade," and he'll be in f.. orgies getting trains ran on him. **** is overwhelming.
Studies estimate that 2 percent to 7 percent of boys under age 12 regularly display “cross-gender” behaviors, though very few wish to actually be a girl.
The studies on what happens in adulthood to boys who strayed from gender norms all have methodological limitations, but they suggest that although plenty of gay men don’t start out as pink boys, 60 to 80 percent of pink boys do eventually become gay men. The rest grow up to either become heterosexual men or become women by taking hormones and maybe having surgery. Gender-nonconforming behavior of girls, however, is rarely studied, in part because departures from traditional femininity are so pervasive and accepted.
Again more proof that the homos want access to the youth (and their "*******s,") of America. If you start them young indoctrinate with them with this bull**** at an early age, they'll come to see male-to-male fellatio and male-to-male sodomy as something as normal. This is what Hilter'em was doing with the Hilter youth. This is some ****ed up insidious ****.
By age 4, he sometimes sobbed when he saw himself in the mirror wearing pants, saying he felt ugly.
This is so sad. It's one thing for a little girl to what to be pretty, but a little boy? Again, I blame the father for allowing to son to not only engage but entertain this bull****. Why didn't the father stress to the son the right and goodness of being a male. There's too much b....ness going on in this family. I wouldn't be surprised if the father was a half-a-homo his damn self.
In the 19th century, both boys and girls often wore dresses and long hair until they were 7. Colors weren’t gendered consistently. At times pink was considered a strong, and therefore masculine, color, while blue was considered delicate. Children’s clothes for both sexes included lace, ruffles, flowers and kittens.
What this is neglecting to tell you is that boys weren't running around acting like girls.
By age 10, most pink boys drop much of their unconventional appearance and activities, either because they outgrow the desire or subsume it.
The studies on what happens in adulthood to boys who strayed from gender norms all have methodological limitations, but they suggest that although plenty of gay men don’t start out as pink boys, 60 to 80 percent of pink boys do eventually become gay men. The rest grow up to either become heterosexual men or become women by taking hormones and maybe having surgery.
By age 4, he sometimes sobbed when he saw himself in the mirror wearing pants, saying he felt ugly.
This is some sad and disturbing ****. Little boys shouldn't concerned with being "ugly." That's a preoccupation for little girls. Again I blame the father not instilling in this young boy that it's cool to be a man and being a male is something that celebrated.
but the gay rights movement has made a big difference. Moreover, the visibility of transgender people — be it running for office or tangoing on “Dancing With the Stars” — has provided an opening for those who fall between genders. many school districts and local governments now ban discrimination based on gender identity or expression.
Again we see the malignant cancer that calls itself the "gay rights movement." We should of seen the forest for the trees concerning these sexual deviants. It wasn't about jobs, housing, or being able to walk the streets without worrying about about an ass whoopin'. It's about being approach heterosexuals (especially men with impunity,)
It's about forcing their ****ed up lifestyle upon the masses. It about normalizing their deviant and ****ed up behavior to a younger generation. If this happens, the sexual predators will have political momentum to lower the age of consent that will give them access to young and boys girls, and finally, it's about blurry the gender roles to the point where they no longer exist. Where what we know now as being a male is far distant memory. This is the f..g's long term agenda.[/B]
