"I just moved here from Florida."

That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?

She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."

She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.

I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.

Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.

Read more...

Wealth is key for marriage, study claims

"So, What Do You Do for Fun?"

She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.

Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.

The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.

Read more...

JeeperCane

Don Juan
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Good read. It doesn't seem to be that earth-shattering really. When you think about it, it makes perfect sense. I'm sure there is some study about the attractiveness of a woman vs. her wife skills when women are in abundance as well. You probably could manipulate the data any way you want to fit your timeframe. Also, the whole 56% of poor men getting married vs. 60% of wealthy men really isn't a strong parallel IMO. (No, I didn't read it word-for-word, but skimmed it, so I might have missed something.)
 

ketostix

Banned
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,871
Reaction score
55
JeeperCane said:
Also, the whole 56% of poor men getting married vs. 60% of wealthy men really isn't a strong parallel IMO. (No, I didn't read it word-for-word, but skimmed it, so I might have missed something.)
I haven't read the study yet either, but I would say if slightly higher percentage of wealthy men are getting married it's still significant because I believe a wealthy guy has less to gain by marriage than a poor guy. The wealthier guys are probably getting more attraction wives and with less effort, that's the main thing.
 

mzilla2

Don Juan
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
134
Reaction score
1
Basic economics of supply and demand by analyzing marriage trends relative to the wealth of the husband over the past century.

Gist of the article is that when men are plentiful, women can bid up their price (secure a weathier husband), and when men are scarce, women will drop their price (settle for a less wealthy husband).

OMG what a revelation! :D

No inference as to the quality or marriage, it also says that when men are plentiful they are more likely to stay faithful and invest resources in their children. Shocking!
 

wheelin&dealin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 10, 2002
Messages
1,924
Reaction score
6
Location
Vancouver, BC
bigjohnson said:
Anecdotally I know that as my earning power has grown it has gone from chasing girls to choosing girls. Women will make themselves a lot more available to a guy who is or has potential to be a good earner.

Not a newsflash, I know. :)
True. In my early twenties I was doing the chasing... Now it's like, ok babe... you work at a restaurant/bar. I make about 10x's more money than you and have a condo worth half a million bucks. Why should I consider you girlfriend material? :)
 

“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”

Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.

Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers.  Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.

I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.

Read more...

joekerr31

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 20, 2005
Messages
3,394
Reaction score
110
Age
52
AgonyUncle said:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/12/12/scirmarr112.xml

Well this comes as a surprise. And here I thought it was all about sharing your emotions and giving her backrubs when she is feeling down
devils advocate for a moment. let's say that it was men who had kids. so you'd have to take 2 or more breaks from your career. if you wanted to be at home when they were young you'd potentially take 5-10 years off and then go back to work.

now imagine that there was this world of women out there. some women were hb10s but worked at subway and could barely afford to pay rent. and then there were some hb7s who were lawyers and could afford a big house, cars, etc.

which woman would you want to settle down with and have kids with?

the fact that women are drawn to money is no surprise. men would be also if we were in their choose.

now that said, how important money is in comparison to other traits is the question. for many women, all they really want is a man with a stable job that earns 'enough' to get by in life. as long as he has that, then all the other stuff comes into play (looks, personality, love, etc.).

but the women who ONLY care about money and marrying the richest guy they can, are cut throat gold diggers.

but im not surprised that earning potential is part of a womans assessment of a man - it makes sense.
 

bigjohnson

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,438
Reaction score
38
Women (and men to a lesser degree) con themselves all the time. If two essentially equal guys are available and one has an adequate career while the other has an extraordinary career, she will convince herself that the better earning is better looking, or smarter, or better in a conversation, that he makes her laugh, or whatever it takes to validate her choice to go with the financially better off guy.

Then she will forever deny that money had anything to do with it. But science like this doesn't lie.


PS -

I'm pretty sure it's "in their shoes" dude.
 

STR8UP

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 10, 2002
Messages
6,911
Reaction score
125
bigjohnson said:
Women (and men to a lesser degree) con themselves all the time. If two essentially equal guys are available and one has an adequate career while the other has an extraordinary career, she will convince herself that the better earning is better looking, or smarter, or better in a conversation, that he makes her laugh, or whatever it takes to validate her choice to go with the financially better off guy.
This is the 2007 quote of the year!
 

joekerr31

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 20, 2005
Messages
3,394
Reaction score
110
Age
52
you know, another point worth considering.

men with money seem to have no problem that their money attracts women. its the men without money who have a problem with it.

just like attractive women have no problem that men want them for their bodies. while women who aren't attractive do.

ultimately what this tells us is that most people don't care 'why' they get what they want, simply that they get it (which is an argument against the points i've recently made in my post that most people are inherently good - but that post is about people in general, whereas this one is about mating. i believe general life versus mating dynamics bring out very different sides in people).
 

Drum&Bass

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
1,190
Reaction score
35
Age
46
Location
I travel
I firmly believe that if we humans beings are able to come to terms with the fact that we are selfish and shallow for various reasons, the faster and easier it will be for us to genuinely discover, show and practice 'true love', 'romance' and all the other illusions that were invented by man.
and what happens to the "genuinely discovered, true love" if a wealthy man loses his job and can only find work that pays him as much as the average joe or less ???
 

"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

bigjohnson

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,438
Reaction score
38
Drum&Bass said:
and what happens to true love if a wealthy man loses his job and can only find work that pays him as much as the average joe or less ???
Women see the potential to be a good earner, for lack of a better term. It's not what he has at the second, but what she believes he can and will do overall. That is of course strongly informed by personality traits and track record. Track record shows as present situation.

Also she's going to be trapped a little in her own imaginary world. So basically more often than not they will "stand by their man" long enough to make themselves feel good about leaving and also long enough to be pretty sure he's not gonna rise from his ashes.

In short they ride that horse into the ground and then switch.
 

ketostix

Banned
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,871
Reaction score
55
bigjohnson said:
Women (and men to a lesser degree) con themselves all the time. If two essentially equal guys are available and one has an adequate career while the other has an extraordinary career, she will convince herself that the better earning is better looking, or smarter, or better in a conversation, that he makes her laugh, or whatever it takes to validate her choice to go with the financially better off guy.

Then she will forever deny that money had anything to do with it. But science like this doesn't lie.


PS -

I'm pretty sure it's "in their shoes" dude.
I second that as the 2007 quote of the year!

I would also add if two men with all else being the more attractive one would get all the other positive attributes ascribed to him.
 
Top