Hello Friend,

If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.

It will be the most efficient use of your time.

And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.

Thank you for visiting and have a great day!

Vision of a Feminist Utopia

wjh

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 26, 2004
Messages
999
Reaction score
27
Location
Los Angeles, SFV
I thought this was pretty interesting and wanted to share it. Original article found here: http://roissy.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/vision-of-a-feminist-utopia/

I will now present to you a vision of hell as dreamed up in the minds of the man-hating women who litter internet toilets like Feministing and who live in countries like Sweden, once proud nation of Viking warriors. This is what the world would look like if feminists had their way.

Man Tax

Men commit most of the criminal violence against women so it only makes sense according to feminists to tax them for the stress they place upon the social order by their existence. Think tanks (and I use the term loosely) in the USA are seriously considering this measure. Naturally, law-abiding beta males would contribute the most to this anti-man wealth redistribution scheme from men to women. I’m assuming as part of the deal to win passage of this tax real criminals would be let out of prison to ravish the feminists and impregnate them with their dangerously sexy seed.

Thought Crimes

Let’s face it: Hate crime legislation is really a Trojan Horse for thought crime laws. These kinds of laws will never be applied fairly or objectively. They will be targeted against men, particularly straight white men, and the ultimate purpose of such laws will be to break their spirits, just like Big Brother did. The justice system was fine before “hate crimes” when criminals were prosecuted for the hateful acts they committed, and not the truly grievous sin of thinking bad thoughts. By the way, I’m wishing Whoopi Goldberg gets run over by a bus. Lock me up!

Ban on Porn, Sexbot Research, and Foreign Brides

Porn, the coming sexbot revolution (and it will be a revolution greater than the advent of the Pill, mark my words), and sweet foreign ass all achieve, directly and indirectly, to chip away at female sexual market power. More sexual choice for men means less mating choice prerogative for women. Feminists loathe the idea of men having freedom of choice in the sexual market.

Mandatory Castration for Crimes Against Women

If a man hits a woman during a domestic dispute, it’ll be straight to the snippity snip chair for him. Sounds implausible? Oh, my naive readers, you just lack imagination. Given complete freedom to mold the world in the way they see fit, I predict the majority of self-declared feminists would passively welcome this kind of draconian anti-male society. Sure, the beta males would ***** and moan, but who cares about them?

Rape = Death Penalty

Feminists are usually leftwingers who are against capital punishment, but they’ll make an exception for rapists. This includes “date rapes” where the girl and guy were drunk and banged one out on a grimy couch in a frat house and she regretted it the next morning, and he neglected to be responsible for her morning-after feelings before he funneled eight cans of Miller Lite. But don’t worry, feminists will still be against the death penalty for mass murderers as long as their targets are mostly other men.

Better Pay

Even though the supposed injustice of “equal pay” is a farce, feminists in a perfect feminist world won’t be happy with anything less than “better pay”. They will justify this as a reparations plan to rectify the pain and suffering women have had to endure at the hands of men for thousands of years. And they will insist that women deserve higher pay for the same work because they juggle career and family.

Legalized Polygamy

The soft polygamy that has metastasized throughout Western society since the sexual revolution will be codified in law. The West will slowly return to a primitive state of nature, where 60% of the men got no ***** at all. Eventually, the pendulum will swing back once basic infrastructure begins to crumble as the betas decide their services are no longer appreciated. The masterworks of beta cooperation will be a relic of the past.

Ban on DNA Paternity Testing

This is as good as done if countermeasures aren’t taken. There’s a reason feminists are beginning to advocate against paternity testing — the smarter ones among their ranks understand that it shifts the balance of power decidedly in favor of beta males. Feminists want to retain the privilege of cuckolding. It is a power too good to abdicate, because it offers complete freedom from compromise with men to pursue sex and resources in the way they want. Paternity testing will mean an end to f*cking alphas on the side and tricking betas into footing the bill. It will mean women will have to be more responsible and forward-thinking, instead of blindly following their vaginas.

Sexual Harassment Laws Expanded

If you are an unacceptable male who looks one second too long at a woman you can be tried for sexual harassment. The penalties, of course, will be more severe. If you are an alpha male who can read women’s minds and know which women will welcome your advances, you are free to harass with impunity. The laws are meant to make the job of attracting alpha attention and shaming beta attention more convenient for women.

********

Don’t think for a minute feminists wouldn’t welcome this dystopian femicentric world where betas are utterly emasculated and serve only as goo fodder for women and the alpha males they’d **** on a rotating basis. I used to think such a world was an impossibity, but Sweden is now requiring that their men sit to pee. It’s no longer in the realm of fantasy.
 

jophil28

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
5,224
Reaction score
276
Location
Gold Coast. Aust.
puma183 said:
Ban on DNA Paternity Testing:

This day is already here in some of the other Western countries. How anyone can outlaw the Truth is beyond me.

http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2000/09/18/177471.htm?site=catalyst&topic=latest

http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,1564,1422595,00.html
RE the first article...
The current federal President of the AMA down here is a woman. DR Rosanna someone or other. . The previous federal President was Dr Kerryn Phelps a self outed, publicity seeking lesbian.

Further to the article..the AMA and the medical profession has long been hostile to any move toward self determination in regards to patients seeking control of their own health issues. Doctors down here just love being in control of ALL things medical. The article talks about men seeking independent medical tests (DNA). These tests are available in the state of VIctoria OUTSIDE a doctors office.
NO money in that for the poor Family practitioner struggling with those holiday condo payments and that third BMW..
 
Last edited:

puma183

Don Juan
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
147
Reaction score
7
Location
Midwest USA
jophil28 - this goes to show that things like health care laws and family-law have historically been nothing more than thinly veiled attempts to control wealth and to control the masses.
 

jophil28

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
5,224
Reaction score
276
Location
Gold Coast. Aust.
puma183 said:
jophil28 - this goes to show that things like health care laws and family-law have historically been nothing more than thinly veiled attempts to control wealth and to control the masses.
Yup! It is all about money, power and control.
 

djtdot

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
wjh said:
I thought this was pretty interesting and wanted to share it. Original article found here: http://roissy.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/vision-of-a-feminist-utopia/

I used to think such a world was an impossibity, but Sweden is now requiring that their men sit to pee. It’s no longer in the realm of fantasy.

Aha. In Sweden, I wonder what the ancestors of these people, ie Vikings would do if they were to come back and see that their descendants have been reduced to such pussies by stupid ultra feminism.
 

potato

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
474
Reaction score
16
Sweden, the land from where came the greatest warriors, who conquered the world only to give it back, preferring to take care of their own rather than to rot their souls by trying to control the lesser peoples of other lands.

Sweden, the country conservatives love to hate. All those liberal ideas that conservatives bemoan thrive in Sweden and without the dire morass that conservatives predict. The fact that Sweden proves the American conservatives wrong leaves the conservatives to their usual smarminess spitting out their crap saying things such as Sweden makes their men sit to pee.

Back to the OP; boohoohoo, the girls are picking on me, boo, hoo, hoo.
:cry:
 

bigjohnson

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,442
Reaction score
37
Now we know the real motive behind the vikings. They had to get out of the damn house at any cost before their wives sawed the other nut off.
 

potato

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
474
Reaction score
16
Danger said:
Oh yes, Sweden is an economic powerhouse due to it's socialist policies. Clearly socialism is the proper way to go. They are set to overtake Japan as the number two economy in the world.

:rolleyes:
That is why the per capita income in Sweden is $49,000 while in the United States it is only $45,000, and without the crushing, economy destroying debt and corruption running rampant throughout the government and corporations, and without people living in the streets, environmental desegregation, endless wars and all the other crap that are the result of American conservatism.

And let’s not forget all those other Scandinavian countries and their liberal/socialist policies – Norway at $83,000, Finland at $46,000, Iceland at $64,000, and Denmark at $57,000. By the way, Japan is down around $34,000.

And Sweden is more sexually open and less religiously uptight than the United States. Less sexual hangups means less need for sites such as this.
 

puma183

Don Juan
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
147
Reaction score
7
Location
Midwest USA
potato - You seem to be very knowledeable about the economic landscape. However I have to ask you about your earlier comment of "Back to the OP; boohoohoo, the girls are picking on me, boo, hoo, hoo." for wjh's post. There is whole another landscape that affects our lives as men. The legal landscape. I recommend that you research about real life stories happening to American men as we speak at the hands of an out of control Family Court System. There are cuckold men being forced to pay child support for the spawn of lotharios who impregnated their wives, even after DNA Tests proved they weren't the father. There are Phone-Book-Dads whose wages are garnished to pay CS to women whom they have never met. There are men paying life-time alimony to adultress ex-wives who now live with their boyfriends, essentially supporting the guy whom his ex-wife ran off with. These men aren't even able to retire, as the minute they stop paying, they are thrown into prison. Talk about Government Mandated Cuckoldry.

Glenn Sacks' blog is a great place to start.

http://glennsacks.com/

We are on a slippery slope (no pun intended) regarding our Human Rights as Men. Women aren't the enemy. Gynocrat politicians and lawmakers are. They have been eroding our rights day by day, and it's going to get worse before it gets better. Have you heard about "First they came…"? It is a poem attributed to Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) about the inactivity of German intellectuals following the Nazi rise to power and the purging of their chosen targets, group after group. It goes like this ...

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.
When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I was not a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.
 
Last edited:

bigjohnson

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,442
Reaction score
37
potato said:
That is why the per capita income in Sweden is $49,000 ....

Any idea what the mean and median after taxes might be? In the US a median earner pays almost nothing in taxes.
 

ketostix

Banned
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,873
Reaction score
55
Danger said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita

According to this list, it looks like sweden isn't ranked as high as you might suggest.

Also, Sweden is yet another country in debt.

In regards to corruption, if you think it only exists in Corporations, then you have a lot of learning to do my friend.
You beat me to it exposing potato's disinformation. Qatar was no.1 and is nothing like Sweden. As for the rest of what potato says it's total nonsense. (S)he thinks socialist governments are all nicey nicey. I guess potato never heard of the National Socialist party (Nazis) and the communist who killed millions of their own people and tried to take over the world and would have if it weren't for "evil" western democratic (small "d") powers. Nowadays, the socialist/communist have changed tactics and are slowly taking over Europe and looks like the U.S. now very soon. Anyway, we know potato is a liberal and probably a woman lesbian and a fraud.

Any idea what the mean and median after taxes might be? In the US a median earner pays almost nothing in taxes.
<$10,000? :woo:
 

ElChoclo

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
593
Reaction score
11
Location
Sydney
Mr/Miss Potatohead, we can only have true equality when every second body bag sent back from a war contains a woman's body, when every second person killed or maimed in heavy industry is a woman and when every second prisoner is a woman. Then we can all rest easy.

The way these feminists see it a million men's deaths are a statistic but a single woman's death is a tragedy.
 

puma183

Don Juan
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
147
Reaction score
7
Location
Midwest USA
Similarly in feminists' world view: a married woman staying at home and eating bon-bons for 10 years is seen as eternal sacrifice, but her husband paying alimony for the rest of his life after she divorces him is seen as all good and proper.
 

potato

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
474
Reaction score
16
Danger said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...PP)_per_capita

According to this list, it looks like sweden isn't ranked as high as you might suggest.

Also, Sweden is yet another country in debt.

In regards to corruption, if you think it only exists in Corporations, then you have a lot of learning to do my friend.
Naw, corruption permeates society – government, business, schools, churches, sports, news media, the police… Conservative ideology of deregulation only encourages it by removing checks and balances.

Your list is flawed.
the Wikipedia article said:
As estimates and assumptions have to be made, the results produced by different organizations for the same country tend to differ, sometimes substantially. PPP figures are estimates rather than hard facts, and should be used with caution.
If you take the more direct route, using raw data, that is to take the GNP of a nation and divide it by the number of people living in that country you get a measure of the wealth of the productivity of that country.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)_per_capita

Nonetheless, the argument is made that if the Democrats take power (ie Obama) that the United States would be pulled into becoming a socialist state – purposely conjuring up our past anti-Soviet programming, I’m sure. Yet the social programs most promoted by Democrats are more in line with Scandinavian style liberal social programs. That counties like Sweden and Norway have thriving innovative industries is a solid refutation of the dire predictions of conservatives. In typical conservative fashion, rather than face the flaws in their arguments, they resort to insults and character smears. After all, we can’t hope to follow the example of a country that requires their men to sit to pee. All this in the face of a crashing economy at the hands of conservatism.

ketostix said:
As for the rest of what potato says it's total nonsense. (S)he thinks socialist governments are all nicey nicey. I guess potato never heard of the National Socialist party (Nazis) and the communist who killed millions of their own people and tried to take over the world and would have if it weren't for "evil" western democratic (small "d") powers. Nowadays, the socialist/communist have changed tactics and are slowly taking over Europe and looks like the U.S. now very soon.
And I thought that you had unplugged from the matrix. You’re confusing brutal dictators (Hitler, Stalin) with universal health care, fairness in debate and in business, and tolerance of others. Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union failed for want of empire, not their social programs. It is for want of empire that contributes heavily to the current economic turmoil that the United States now faces, and this is after the conservatives have stripped away as many social programs as they could. What does it take for you to see the reality of the situation?

#######################################

I used to work with this guy, Randy. He was the type that never seemed to have much of a problem getting women to go out with him. Yet he could never sustain a relationship with a woman for more than a few months. After having met a few of his dates, I found it striking that the women he typically pursued tended to be highly liberal as he tended to be conservative in his outlook. When Randy complained of his problems with women and inability to understand them; he often sounded as if he couldn’t understand liberal thinking.

Hanging out with strippers I noticed that most strippers tend to be extremely liberal and non-, even anti- religious. Conversely the customers at strip clubs tend to be decidedly conservative. The seeming hypocrisy of many of their customers does not go unnoticed by the dancers.

Polls tend to show women supporting a more liberal point of view and men supporting a more conservative point of view. What this translates to is that in liberal circles, the women tend to out number the men while in conservative circles, men tend to out number women.

Now, if you consider that all the A Team men and women liberals pair up and all the A Team men and women conservatives pair up; that leaves, in the fuzziness that separates the differing points of view, a pool of men who lean a little to the right, yet whose field of sexual opportunity lay with women who lean a little to the left. In the extreme it is bliss, in the middle, it’s a cultural war.

&$#&$&#&$&#&$&#&$&#&$&#&$&#$&

Back to myths and legends; Swedish women, in general, tend to be known for their beauty. This can be explained by their Viking ancestry. When the men from the north sacked cities they took away the treasure that they found. Amongst that treasure included the young women of the finest features who were taken back to Scandinavia as wives. Thus the finest beauty from around the world was stolen away, taken back home to be incorporated into the Scandinavian character.

Say what you will about Swedish men but just remember that odds are that his girlfriend is a lot hotter than your girlfriend, his daughters will be cuter than your daughters, his sons will get girls hotter than you or your sons, and he'll be happier.
 

potato

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
474
Reaction score
16
You’d be surprised. I’ve run into quite a few women who while publicly proclaiming their lesbianism and displaying their gender identity issues in their dress who could still appreciate the hug that only a man can give.
 

potato

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
474
Reaction score
16
johnnyrem said:
Potato stated:

"All this in the face of a crashing economy at the hands of conservatism."

Complete BS. Sorry, Miss Tater, but your favored liberals have quite a lot of blame to shoulder for the lending mess that brought on the bailout and crashing economy.

Making high risk loans to poor credit risks got us in this whole lending mess.

Guess who pushed for liberalized lending practices to poor credit risks so "everyone could own a home."?????

Hint: wasn't the conservatives.

She (potato) is quite incorrect placing blame here.

Actually it was deregulation that led to the current crisis by allowing those at the top to operate without oversight. The same thing happened during the housing and banking failures of the 80’s and Enron and MCI debacles in the early part of this decade.

How much failure does it take to demonstrate the utter failure of modern conservative financial ideology?

Listen to enough Fox news and right wing radio and you develop such a distorted view of the world that reality becomes so unreal that you can’t even see it when it slaps you in the face.

The lesson should be simple, conservatism leads to increases in debt and unemployment, liberalism the opposite, regardless of Rush’s false claims to the contrary.

Wake up, you are still trapped in the matrix!
 

ketostix

Banned
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,873
Reaction score
55
potato said:
The lesson should be simple, conservatism leads to increases in debt and unemployment, liberalism does the same, regardless of Rush’s false claims to the contrary.

Wake up, you are still trapped in the matrix!
There I fixed it. Now you are correct ms. potato.
 

jophil28

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
5,224
Reaction score
276
Location
Gold Coast. Aust.
potato said:
The lesson should be simple, conservatism leads to increases in debt and unemployment, liberalism the opposite, regardless of Rush’s false claims to the contrary.
Another absurd statement by the deluded feminised Tater.
 

puma183

Don Juan
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
147
Reaction score
7
Location
Midwest USA
Here is another one from our friends The Aussies:

http://news.smh.com.au/national/de-facto-couples-bill-passed-by-senate-20081016-52ay.html

They just passed a bill that authorizes Family Courts to "assist" de-facto couples who are breaking up. I.e. If you've dated your girlfriend for more than 2 years, she will now have legal claim against your assets.

Does anyone else see where this is going? The Marriage Strike movement is beginning to have its effects felt. So the ever considerate Family Courts are changing the rules of the game so they can continue to "Harvest" more men.

How long before these laws creep in to the US?
 
Top