Kerpal said:
Wrong again, actually "Congrats on being wrong twice" was borderline ad hominem though, but to really be qualifying I'd need to use the attack to shore up a point.
Kerpal said:
Sure we can, as long as the laws they're disobeying only affect victimless crimes. Like carrying a gun, or smoking pot. Nobody is hurt by it, so we should be able to do it.
Who determines what hurt by it, is? No one has been hurt by my past speeding, or by a friend of mine driving drunk. No one has ever been hurt a lot of individual things that may carry a statistical or societal cost.