"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"

I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.

The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.

Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.

Read more...

Unless you are really hot you are better off not wasting your time on Tinder

"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

bigneil

Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
8,265
Reaction score
2,644
Location
Texas
Great info.

Explanation
  • A girl who is a 10 (lower right) will only like a guy who is a 10.
  • A girl who is an 8 will only like a guy who is a 9.6.
  • A girl who is a 6 will only like a guy who is a 9.2.
Meanwhile
  • A guy who is a 6 will like a girl who is a 1.
  • A guy who is an 8 will like a girl who is a 2.
 

ubercat

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 6, 2015
Messages
3,671
Reaction score
2,309
Location
Australia
Fvck me sideways America is hell for guys. I get play from HB 8 + waitresses all the time. And no I m not tipping or promising them a photoshoot.

Now let's say of the ones that consistently flirt 1 in 10 would put out. I m persistent... I still get an 8. Does this not happen in the US of Agony?
 

ChristopherColumbus

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 8, 2016
Messages
2,263
Reaction score
1,253
Age
59
Location
korea
OK...in the spirit of Savaronela and the Luddites, this calls for a Bonfire of the Vanities!

Smash and burn all smart phones men!:D

Steve Jobs may you burn in hell!.... I take that back.:oops:
 
Last edited:

“The 22 Rules That Turned Me From Invisible to Irresistible With Women… Starting Tonight”

You can skip the expensive cars, the fancy clothes, and the endless gym selfies. Completely unnecessary.

I used to freeze the second a beautiful woman looked my way. Frustrated. Awkward. Watching other guys walk away with the girl while I stood there tongue-tied.

Then I discovered 22 simple rules that rewired my entire dating life. The anxiety vanished. Conversations flowed effortlessly. Women started chasing me for a change.

These rules trigger a woman's subconscious attraction switches. And you can start using them tonight.

Read more...

TheMonkeyKing

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
2,327
Reaction score
1,419
The funny thing is, the 9's on Tinder are 5's in real life.
EDIT: there aren't any 9's on Tinder; male, female or otherwise. Full stop. Genuine 8+'s don't need online dating. But the facts here will translate directly to RL too.

Of course some emotional guys will look at this and assume that women are somehow to blame, because they somehow refuse to lower their standards. However, what this fundamentally shows is that the population of men on the whole actually enable more low value women to have sex/relations etc, than the population of women do of low value men.

So, thank you *science* for pretty much confirming all of my latest, somehow controversial opinions as valid.

-Women are far, far ahead of the game than men, regardless of their own value. If a woman is only going for 8's, 9's and 10's, from an evolutionary stand point, she's doing herself and the species as a whole a massive favour, in terms of reproductive success strategy.
For all the moaning that goes on in this forum, emotard MGTOW types still clearly expect women to be of high value, but refuse to observe and abide by their own lofty standards, which is why their emotional bleating is redundant. For all you can say about women, at least they appear to uphold some sort of standards in this respect, as shown in the data.

-In that same light, regardless of a woman's own value, her reaction toward a man is therefore almost entirely a reflection of his value, rather than hers. To all intents and purposes, as the graph clearly shows, and as I have explained ad nauseum, (most) men will bang anyone, where most women will not bang just anyone. Thus of course they hold the upper hand, along with the top 20% of men. If a man wants to start gaining the upper hand, he needs to become more valuable and develop better standards, it's not any more complicated than that. You are the average value of the five people you spend most of your time with.

Until the graph starts to show a more direct correlation, (i.e. ALL men start upholding and adhering to higher standards), all women and highest value men will continue to hold the best hands at the table.

NB. To assume that this pattern applies to looks alone is a mistake. It is well known that men and women are attracted to different things.
 

ubercat

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 6, 2015
Messages
3,671
Reaction score
2,309
Location
Australia
Geez what a reductionist world view. My best mate is an artist type. Not broke but rents. Never works out. In his 40s and smokes. Top bloke. Very much his own man and despises the Herd. Red pill. Magnificent beard. Well read and good talker. Been fvcking 8+ chicks for years.
 

TheMonkeyKing

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
2,327
Reaction score
1,419
Geez what a reductionist world view. My best mate is an artist type. Not broke but rents. Never works out. In his 40s and smokes. Top bloke. Very much his own man and despises the Herd. Red pill. Magnificent beard. Well read and good talker. Been fvcking 8+ chicks for years.
So, what would you value him on a 1-10 scale? To me, he sounds like he's in the top 30% anyway, regardless of his being an artist and being a tenant, etc. Which is obviously proven, by virtue of his own success. Sounds like you don't value him too highly.
 

"I'm Not Looking for Anything Serious Right Now"

When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.

Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.

Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.

The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.

Read more...

bigneil

Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
8,265
Reaction score
2,644
Location
Texas
I'm thinking Tinder guys would like my women a little more than SS guys claim to.
 

ubercat

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 6, 2015
Messages
3,671
Reaction score
2,309
Location
Australia
My best mate. That title takes years and actions to earn. What I m saying is by the physique, money, social circle scale often pushed by the value crowd here he doesn't rate.
 

sosousage

Banned
Joined
Aug 22, 2017
Messages
3,547
Reaction score
1,219
Age
36
Online Dating will never be useful because all most popular platforms favorize women. Tinder/Badoo/POF made them think they are special. App owners have no reason to change it because horny men pay a lot for Premium on these apps.

I had best luck with Tinder. OLD women advantage is all around the world like that already probably. Im from Germany

My advices:
- muscles, no clothes selfie
- car, friends, job
- entertain them a bit, make them laugh, get their facebook and then ignore them lol, reply barely (basic mind games)
- DONT GIVE A F!!!!!!

If you want to use Tinder you need to know that its not going anywhere. If you have good photo then SOMETIMES you will get a woman from there but mainly cause they are new to OLD or because they left last guy for really small reason// and will quickly replace you with one of the tens of guys messaging her daily.

I rate myself high yet only women 0.1/10 are interested in me (except my ex that was from tinder, she was hot)

Sometimes I get someone from Tinder who has no face deformed and no over fat body (or both, sick!)... But thats because my picture looks like a model (even tho im not and its just how the picture was made, angle)

For me I Still Use Tinder when Im waiting for something (for example 10min wait in shop queue or anything) But if you do that in your free time then you are likely to get deppresed very quick.
 

TheMonkeyKing

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
2,327
Reaction score
1,419
What I m saying is by the physique, money, social circle scale often pushed by the value crowd here he doesn't rate.
So basically, you're saying, despite being his own man, being successful with high value women, clearly having quite profound intrinsic value to earn best friend status, just because he doesn't adhere to the typical social constructions of mate value that you list (i.e. basically material wealth), he doesn't really hold any value in the dating market....?

Your message is very confused. You're projecting your blue pill world view and system of worth on to a guy who clearly does hold quite high red pill value status. Time to make up your mind, what your value system actually is, because your man obviously has his pretty much sorted out.
 

ubercat

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 6, 2015
Messages
3,671
Reaction score
2,309
Location
Australia
So rather than making this a std SS slugfest and trashing the thread let's explore our common ground. I agree completely with you. Obviously I m not a fan of the std value scale. If I ve read the article correctly the scale referenced physical attractiveness. The example of my friend is to illustrate that these categories r easily transcended and guys shouldn't accept these limitations.

BTW your first response to my post was an ad hominem attack. A std rhetorical trick. I prefer an inquisitorial to an adversarial dialogue.
 
Last edited:

"How I Made Sure No Woman Ever Friend-Zoned Me Again"

She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.

You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.

She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.

The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.

Read more...

TheMonkeyKing

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
2,327
Reaction score
1,419
BTW your first response to my post was an ad hominem attack. A std rhetorical trick. I prefer an inquisitorial to an adversarial dialogue.
Fair enough. Rhetoric is often misplaced, or entirely self-serving. However, personally I find myself having to draw upon this kind of persuasive tactic here sometimes, with more closed minds. So excuse any insincerity you might perceive; it is unintentional.
 

"She Made Her Decision Before You Finished Your Sentence"

Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.

She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.

Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.

So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.

The words come later. The impression comes first.

Read more...

Top