Understand This Trifecta With Women And You Will Win

[Spaz]

Im sorry, are you suggesting that it's my fault he behaves the way he does? That I caused his behavior? That I control how he chooses to react?

Nope.

Difference of EQ is not a choice you or he could make. It is what it is.

Edit: My original question, out of curiosity, mine and yours, did you view him as childlike? Meaning as in behaviour.

 

[sazc]

Nope.

Difference of EQ is not a choice you or he could make. It is what it is.

Edit: My original question, out of curiosity, mine and yours, did you view him as childlike? Meaning as in behaviour.

Ok, wasn't sure so, instead of assuming, and then reacting based on a fauly assumption, wanted to clarify.

Agreed on the EQ difference.

No, I didn't view him as a boy. I viewed him as a man. He generally behaved like a man, he just allowed his emotions to take him over and then get out of hand.

 

[Spaz]

Ok, wasn't sure so, instead of assuming, and then reacting based on a fauly assumption, wanted to clarify.

Agreed on the EQ difference.

No, I didn't view him as a boy. I viewed him as a man. He generally behaved like a man, he just allowed his emotions to take him over and then get out of hand.

That's what boys do don't they?

The difference between a boy and a man is the ability or lack of emotional control.

 

[Spaz]

Anyhow I've written abt EQ disparity between a man and women, whereby a man with lower EQ tends to lose his women.

Basically the women becomes a 2nd mom and grows delusional abt the relationship until she's had enough.

The same man would be in a better position and in a better frame if he has an equal or higher EQ vs the women he's in a relationship. That relationship might be more sustainable in the long run.

You just need to get a man with a higher or an equal EQ.

I've written a formula as a guideline, if it's any help for you @sazc

 

[sazc]

That's what boys do don't they?

The difference between a boy and a man is the ability or lack of emotional control.

Yes. (Lol, my 11yo has better emotional control actually)

But you asked me if I viewed him as a boy, I didn't.

 

[Spaz]

Yes. (Lol, my 11yo has better emotional control actually)

But you asked me if I viewed him as a boy, I didn't.

I knew I was right xD

 

[sazc]

Anyhow I've written abt EQ disparity between a man and women, whereby a man with lower EQ tends to lose his women.

Basically the women becomes a 2nd mom and grows delusional abt the relationship until she's had enough.

The same man would be in a better position and in a better frame if he has an equal or higher EQ vs the women he's in a relationship. That relationship might be more sustainable in the long run.

You just need to get a man with a higher or an equal EQ.

I've written a formula as a guideline, if it's any help for you @sazc

Agreed.

I'm LONG past the idea of helping anyone be a better person (being a mom to another adult, male or female) I used to think I could "help" someone, hello them make better choices, evolve, etc.

At this point I realize/subscribe to the notion that people are who they are, will only change if THEY want to, you can't change anyone, and that YOU need to decide if you can live with this person for who they are today.

If you can't live with them you move on.

 

[sazc]

Yes. (Lol, my 11yo has better emotional control actually)

But you asked me if I viewed him as a boy, I didn't.

I knew I was right xD

I just realized that about my kid as I was replying. It hadn't hit me till that moment.

 

[sazc]

Anyhow I've written abt EQ disparity between a man and women, whereby a man with lower EQ tends to lose his women.

Basically the women becomes a 2nd mom and grows delusional abt the relationship until she's had enough.

The same man would be in a better position and in a better frame if he has an equal or higher EQ vs the women he's in a relationship. That relationship might be more sustainable in the long run.

You just need to get a man with a higher or an equal EQ.

I've written a formula as a guideline, if it's any help for you @sazc

Yes, I've long been saying, I need a PARTNER.

I'd be interested in reading the formula/guideline.

 

[Spaz]

Hahaha

It wasn't his fault @sazc and it wasn't yours too.

But both would blame the other, understandably so.

If he had someone who was younger and below his EQ level, then he wouldn't be displaying those same behaviours.

Now you know don't you?

Edit: 1/2 + 7 and below, example a 35 year old man; 35 X 1/2 + 7 = 24.5 year old woman and below is an ideal candidate for said man, as he will then have an EQ equal or higher then her.

 

[sazc]

Hahaha

It wasn't his fault @sazc and it wasn't yours too.

But both would blame the other, understandably so.

If he had someone who was younger and below his EQ level, then he wouldn't be displaying those same behaviours.

Now you know don't you?

Oh, I don't blame myself. He chooses his own behavior.

From what I could ascertain, he actually did this with his first 2 wives as well. It's an ingrained pattern, a part of who he is and how he handles his life.

Too dramatic for me. I have important stuff I need to focus on, I don't need to deal with an emotional man on top of it. Unnecessary complications and attention seeking

 

[RangerMIke]

Fastest way to lose a chick is to have no emotional self control, the next fastest way is when a man ignores personal hygiene and does not care about how he shows up. Often it's the little things... nose hairs not trimmed, eye brows out of control... dull teeth... inappropriate clothing and clothes that do not fit, dirty shoes or shoes that are not shined.... all these things are fixable with minimal effort, so if you do not take care of these things, chicks will see this as a red flag,. Everyone has "bad hair days" so if on occasion you are not at your best this is forgiven as long as you don't make a habit of it, but lack of emotional control or efforts to emotionally manipulate a chick will end things really fast.

 

[Vantagepoint34]

What are you saying all the rangers want to open the case of IZ. And settle it in WW3.

 

[sosousage]

Idk how it is on the other side of the fence, but dudes be letting their teeth "go", and they seem to think it doesn't matter.

A bright smile is attractive and good teeth say a lot about who you are, indicate your financial status, and silently speak as to how you care for yourself.

you just in for the money i knew it


how often we talk about how much money woman makes? never

how often sazc talks about men's financial situation? always!

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

The Trifecta.

1) Women want the highest value male to have sex with as far as looks, money, and status. We all know this.

More like, women want their cake and want to eat it too.

She's a secretary. Must have lawyer etc.

Classic hypergamy but, it doesn't stop here.


Its crater SMV ie 18-23, its then time to play house and baby rabies.


Even still, they putz beta male shame their man into oblivion.

If he actually unplugs, goes TRP, he might wake up, and realize he can do better then w fat wife, sexless marriage, and being a cog in the feminine imperative. That is being a sacrificial lamb.

2) Women want the most resources and return on investment (of time). Resources and return includes money, living situation, and stimulation of their emotions.
3) Women want to put the least amount of effort and work back into a relationship as possible in order to get their needs of #1 & #2 met

Hence bulking season after marriage.

If they can get the whole trifecta from the same guy, they will. However if they have to use one guy for #1 (Chad) and one guy for #2 (Mr. Beta Bux), then they will. Or multiple Chads, Beta Bux Husbands, and Orbiters; however many it takes. Then as soon as one guy or the other starts requiring more of #3 out of them then they want to put in, the said guy gets the boot from the circle. Bottom line, if you are only giving a woman #1 OR #2 she will get either/or from another guy. If you are requiring more of #3 out of her than she wants to put in, she WILL be shopping to replace you eventually.

Agreed.

Herein lies male disposability and lack thereof in adaptation.

Acquire woman, durr, dad bod, go mgtow after financial rape in court.

It really is not anymore complicated than this. Know what you are dealing with when you engage in any level of relations with women, and you will win.

Definition of "win"

Most threads here are women nearing or have hit the wall. Single moms threads and telling her kids "hey Johnny, I wm your new daddy."

Playing house with Chad's booty call and Tyrone thunder cawks gang bang isn't a win in my estimation.


By win, I can say, I only know of one man who is "winning" WHO is married.

Alternative is Playboy lifestyle.

As in #nextset! Pull/smash/next & repeat!

Guys on the other hand want #1 as far as looks/attractiveness goes. They want #2 as far as money goes. However, they don't expect the woman to provide that. They provide it for themselves. Then as far as #3 goes, guys are willing to put in effort and work with a woman to try and make the relationship a success. This is one of the key elements of downfall of modern male/female relationships. Guys want to put in more, while women want to put in less.

Great post.

I am think its key that in this pre apocalyptic affirmative action hell hole, women must bring actual resources rather then debt to the table. Its not enough to be attractive.

High kill count equates to a terrible wife and mother (source check YouTube truth on sex). Probability of divorce is astronomical and men know this but are retarded when a semi attractive woman shows interest regardless of her age,agenda, and ****ty lifestyle choices.

Furthermore, if she has green hair,feminism, tattoos, that goro mk bald spot haircut which screams trashy thot, SJW, any subscription to victimhood,etc equates to hitting the ejection button.

You hit it nail on with #3. Its again Male mediocrity and lack thereof in evolutionary adaptation.

Its 2018. Its cuck central to be a sacrificial lamb. Its stupid to play house with post wall women. Its then time to adapt and shift one's paradigm.

Not in the mood? Some other girl is.

A problem is with marriage, children, gov, custody,state, etc.

Its bulking season after. Its not in the mood. Its lose lose.

With the feminine imperative, hypergamy is unleashed. Its laws implemented to block male top form SMV and to poison drop him into oblivion. Its proud single mom. Its anti slut shame. Anti fat shame. Mitigate declining SMV for women. Crucifying men financially and sexually.


Before feminism, hypergamy was on a leash because younger girls are turning 18 everyday. It would stop hypergamy on steroids.

A ****ty wife or bulking season, ****ing husband, cutting off their man.


As a single man, I operate accordingly but, I cannot see a way forward with marriage and children.

 

[sazc]

you just in for the money i knew it


how often we talk about how much money woman makes? never

how often sazc talks about men's financial situation? always!

Lol hello bitter Betty!

 

[ChristopherColumbus]

Idk how it is on the other side of the fence, but dudes be letting their teeth "go", and they seem to think it doesn't matter.

A bright smile is attractive and good teeth say a lot about who you are, indicate your financial status, and silently speak as to how you care for yourself.

A too perfect set of teeth should also be a turn-off... or at least a red flag.