HalfPUAHalfAFC
Senior Don Juan
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2012
- Messages
- 323
- Reaction score
- 60
This story was told to me by a buddy last night...
So, about a year back his wife files for divorce. In the process, she takes a restraining order out on him (he's harmless, never touched her). This also means he would get limited and supervised visits with his kids, and again, totally unnecessary.
Well, it goes as you might think. He moves out and finds a new place. He feels humiliated and confused, and so on. He's predictably broke too.
Lucky for him, the manager at a music club we works at has taken a liking to him and now he's getting laid on the regular.
Anyway, a few days ago was the second to last day to meet with the lawyers before signing final divorce papers.
He tells me after the meeting that the soon-to-be-ex-wife was very nice, friendly, and touchy-feely after the meeting. And then she drops this bombshell on him: "Why didn't you fight for me? I filed for divorce to see if you really loved me."
WTF????
Divorce as a s-test???
Maybe.
I talked with a female friend about it and we came up with two other possibilities, because a divorce s-test just seems too outlandish (but not necessarily out of the question).
1) She's heard about his new girlfriend and she's trying to sabotage that. She just can't imagine he's moved on and wants to undermine his impending happiness.
2) She already had a new man lined up, filed for divorce, it didn't work out, and now she has regrets (my female friend's theory). This is not to rule out #1 also being operative.
I suspect her hamster got running and thought this would be a way to reframe the divorce on her part, to mess with his head/life, and to make her feel like she did it for the right reason (i.e., if she can reframe it as a s-test, then when he failed it she was right to do it the whole time).
Anyway, whether or not she filed for divorce as a s-test only one major evil here. The other is that she would in fact tell him this. If it's true, there's no reason to tell him except to rub it in. If it's not true, the only reason to tell him is to mess with his mind and his future.
I've met this woman a few times. She seemed very nice, friendly, outgoing, cool, etc.
Unbelievable a woman could something like that, but I guess this is not the worst thing a kunt has done to a guy. Still, the workings of a mind that would either do it for real or lie about doing it is really hard to fathom.
So, about a year back his wife files for divorce. In the process, she takes a restraining order out on him (he's harmless, never touched her). This also means he would get limited and supervised visits with his kids, and again, totally unnecessary.
Well, it goes as you might think. He moves out and finds a new place. He feels humiliated and confused, and so on. He's predictably broke too.
Lucky for him, the manager at a music club we works at has taken a liking to him and now he's getting laid on the regular.
Anyway, a few days ago was the second to last day to meet with the lawyers before signing final divorce papers.
He tells me after the meeting that the soon-to-be-ex-wife was very nice, friendly, and touchy-feely after the meeting. And then she drops this bombshell on him: "Why didn't you fight for me? I filed for divorce to see if you really loved me."
WTF????
Divorce as a s-test???
Maybe.
I talked with a female friend about it and we came up with two other possibilities, because a divorce s-test just seems too outlandish (but not necessarily out of the question).
1) She's heard about his new girlfriend and she's trying to sabotage that. She just can't imagine he's moved on and wants to undermine his impending happiness.
2) She already had a new man lined up, filed for divorce, it didn't work out, and now she has regrets (my female friend's theory). This is not to rule out #1 also being operative.
I suspect her hamster got running and thought this would be a way to reframe the divorce on her part, to mess with his head/life, and to make her feel like she did it for the right reason (i.e., if she can reframe it as a s-test, then when he failed it she was right to do it the whole time).
Anyway, whether or not she filed for divorce as a s-test only one major evil here. The other is that she would in fact tell him this. If it's true, there's no reason to tell him except to rub it in. If it's not true, the only reason to tell him is to mess with his mind and his future.
I've met this woman a few times. She seemed very nice, friendly, outgoing, cool, etc.
Unbelievable a woman could something like that, but I guess this is not the worst thing a kunt has done to a guy. Still, the workings of a mind that would either do it for real or lie about doing it is really hard to fathom.
"
