B
BlueAlpha1
Guest
I keep hearing it is "unprecedented" for a presidential candidate to refuse to accept the outcome of an election, as the media onslaught on Trump continues. At this point, the're beating a dead horse and running it over backwards and forwards, but who expected them to stop? They stole an election and now they're going to brag about it as she's carried in on a throne and crowned like a Saudi royal family member. She won this election in the sense that she was placed on a chariot made of gold and given a head start in the red zone, while his legs were broken by mafia thugs 90 yards behind and then he started at the 1. This woman has been carried by a well-oiled media machine, which if she didn't have at her side, would have soundly lost the primary to a 75 year old socialist with poorly fitted suits.
They're also lying about her having a "clean sweep over the debates". She won one - the 1st, because he did nothing but take the bait constantly. He pummeled her in debate 2, and last night was underwhelming and the closest thing to a wash we've seen. He didn't hit her on enough points and didn't create enough momentum his way, but of course she said zero items of substance other than "systemic racism" and "women's rights", in a world of affirmative action quotas and 60% female breadwinners.
As far as rigging, the fact is Trump is right to be outraged. Yes, this election was rigged. Oh no, not in the sense that Trump ballots were thrown into a shredder or not counted (although we may get that too, and that'll be her 2020 scandal that the media ignores), but rigged in the sense that the media onslaught resembled a live playout of 1984 where government and media work together to form the ultimate, impenetrable propaganda arm.
The mainstream media spent months on the kind of locker room talk that every single male and approximately 97% of females in the country has engaged in, and on comments taken out of context (no, he didn't call generic "Mexicans" rapists). At the same time, they ignored espionage, treason, and bribery, and much more substantive cases of sexual misconduct from the other candidate. This gives Donald Trump every right NOT to accept the legitimacy of this election. I'm a tax paying American voter and I don't accept the outcome as a fair representative example of democracy.
I'll give you a few examples that make this election remind me of 1984. They keep accusing TRUMP of supporting the Iraq war, back when he was a businessman who was sort of wishy-washy about it at the time. Why his opinion as a real estate mogul on Iraq was important in 2003 who knows, but he quickly cleared up his position and stayed there. There are clips of him ripping President Bush while he was still in office pre-2008. The dude wasn't even a politician at the time, but the person who is on that stage VOTED FOR IT got a free pass on Iraq the whole time.
I also mentioned the ACTUAL sexual assault her husband committed as opposed to the jumbled rumor mill occupied by Trump's "victims". Her husband was IMPEACHED for sexual misconduct, and her intimidation of the victims is well-documented. Why wasn't she asked about the no less than a HALF-DOZEN people who have DISAPPEARED OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH after crossing the Clintons on this issue and others like it?
It was counter-intuitive to it's core. Everything we knew to be true about the candidates was flipped. Don't grill the Secretary who was a chief architect of the Iraq war, grill the businessman who sort of mumbled about it from a distance. Are we living in the real world, or is slavery actually freedom, is war actually peace, and is Donald Trump more to blame for the Iraq war than Hillary Clinton?
SHE should have received the endless onslaught of scrutiny. SHAME on ABC, CBS, Huffington Post, Salon, Slate, The Atlantic, New York Times, Daily News, MSNBC, and a SPECIAL shoutout to the Clinton News Network (CNN) for being the biggest player in undermining our democracy as we know it. Thank you for the Trojan Horse of Syrian "refugees", for the continued discrimination of the working man to subsidize the entitlement generation, and for the impending World War III with Russia. You guys were so upset that he threatened to jail his political opponent because "that's what they do in dictatorships." Well if the shoe fits, wear it. She IS a fvcking criminal.
They're also lying about her having a "clean sweep over the debates". She won one - the 1st, because he did nothing but take the bait constantly. He pummeled her in debate 2, and last night was underwhelming and the closest thing to a wash we've seen. He didn't hit her on enough points and didn't create enough momentum his way, but of course she said zero items of substance other than "systemic racism" and "women's rights", in a world of affirmative action quotas and 60% female breadwinners.
As far as rigging, the fact is Trump is right to be outraged. Yes, this election was rigged. Oh no, not in the sense that Trump ballots were thrown into a shredder or not counted (although we may get that too, and that'll be her 2020 scandal that the media ignores), but rigged in the sense that the media onslaught resembled a live playout of 1984 where government and media work together to form the ultimate, impenetrable propaganda arm.
The mainstream media spent months on the kind of locker room talk that every single male and approximately 97% of females in the country has engaged in, and on comments taken out of context (no, he didn't call generic "Mexicans" rapists). At the same time, they ignored espionage, treason, and bribery, and much more substantive cases of sexual misconduct from the other candidate. This gives Donald Trump every right NOT to accept the legitimacy of this election. I'm a tax paying American voter and I don't accept the outcome as a fair representative example of democracy.
I'll give you a few examples that make this election remind me of 1984. They keep accusing TRUMP of supporting the Iraq war, back when he was a businessman who was sort of wishy-washy about it at the time. Why his opinion as a real estate mogul on Iraq was important in 2003 who knows, but he quickly cleared up his position and stayed there. There are clips of him ripping President Bush while he was still in office pre-2008. The dude wasn't even a politician at the time, but the person who is on that stage VOTED FOR IT got a free pass on Iraq the whole time.
I also mentioned the ACTUAL sexual assault her husband committed as opposed to the jumbled rumor mill occupied by Trump's "victims". Her husband was IMPEACHED for sexual misconduct, and her intimidation of the victims is well-documented. Why wasn't she asked about the no less than a HALF-DOZEN people who have DISAPPEARED OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH after crossing the Clintons on this issue and others like it?
It was counter-intuitive to it's core. Everything we knew to be true about the candidates was flipped. Don't grill the Secretary who was a chief architect of the Iraq war, grill the businessman who sort of mumbled about it from a distance. Are we living in the real world, or is slavery actually freedom, is war actually peace, and is Donald Trump more to blame for the Iraq war than Hillary Clinton?
SHE should have received the endless onslaught of scrutiny. SHAME on ABC, CBS, Huffington Post, Salon, Slate, The Atlantic, New York Times, Daily News, MSNBC, and a SPECIAL shoutout to the Clinton News Network (CNN) for being the biggest player in undermining our democracy as we know it. Thank you for the Trojan Horse of Syrian "refugees", for the continued discrimination of the working man to subsidize the entitlement generation, and for the impending World War III with Russia. You guys were so upset that he threatened to jail his political opponent because "that's what they do in dictatorships." Well if the shoe fits, wear it. She IS a fvcking criminal.
Last edited by a moderator: