Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
Oh, Ok, maybe I should consult a Quija Board, base my decisions on Astrology, or ask Angels for insights into attraction. This isn't a philosophical debate, it's much more simple. Run tests on a large number of men and women, and look at the results. If it wasn't for science you wouldn't be able to refute scientific methods on a computer genius.JLW said:
So were newtons laws the absolute truth? no. Reductionists determined that quantum physics is more suited to describe our universe. Science isn't the absolute truth, its a method to describe what we see around us. There is always a degree of uncertainty. Take for example the Heisenberg uncertainty principal that states that an observer created universe in and of itself skews results ( more precisely one can not determine and objects location and momentum simultaneously, i digress). The idea is that there is always a degree of error even when data supports an hypothesis, and anyone worth a damn in the community knows this.Mistic said:
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
This is a classic example of one of those word problems with all that unnecessary information in there to confuse people. Confidence, wit, and money are the important things that you mentioned.Mistic said:
Dude. You posted a topic in order to incite discussion about "Do looks matter? If so, how much?" Please don't try to act like you're not looking for debate. You've been here long enough to know that there's two clear sides to this issue, and neither side will give way to the other. I mean s.hit, didn't the fact that there's an 85 page thread about this subject in the Archives clue you in that this may be an incendiary topic?
Mistic said:
This is a 100% accurate statement, but people will still disagree (and have, as you've seen) with it. Which makes it more and more apparent to me that getting to true knowledge by discussions with random people on the 'net is an exercise in futility.Mistic said:
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
Okay, so can you prove scientifically that this statement is true? That was a rhetorical question, because you can't. There's no way to test that science is the best way to obtain knowledge through the scientific method. Science is merely a means by which we make assessments of the physical world....Zarky said:
I would mostly agree with you here, however.
I'm not sure if you were suggesting this, but figuring out if 2+2=4 employs absolutely NO scientific method. Figuring out if 2+2=4 is a mathematical truth. Mathematical truths presuppose science. You need logic/math before you can start doing the scientific method.
I use these boards exclusively for kicks. I agree that simply practicing is far more useful than these boards. I will sometimes get advice on these boards when I experience a moment of craziness (it's hard to look at your own situations objectively so going on here gives you a good dose of reality if you're struggling with something).
We are talking about the physical world genius. When you shoot loads of sperm all over face and in her nostrils, is that a spiritual thing? Is pvssy juice etherical slime or can you actually watch it squirt across the room upon a proper female ejaculation?JLW said:
You have completely missed the point.real2 said:
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
Mistic said:
You guys should be able to find it on a torrent site. "The Science of Sex Appeal."real2 said:
