Really poor journalism by the Rolling Stone and the writer and editor should lose their jobs.Danger said:As if on cue jurry......
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local...a5f7d2-7c91-11e4-84d4-7c896b90abdc_story.html
Some key points which I said before and you denied.....
- The Post generally does not identify victims of sexual assault without their permission.
- The prominent fraternity — which has been vilified, vandalized and ultimately suspended on campus since Sabrina Rubin Erdely’s Rolling Stone article went online last month.
So here we have a claim of rape, the woman's name is protected and the men in this fraternity have to pay a severe price.
But hey, it's "statistically insignificant" right? Or by your earlier incorrect statements, newspapers do not as a rule decline to publish the alleged "victim's" name.
That said...how many actual rapes and beaten women can we find in the last week from a simple web search or Youtube search? So let's keep things in perspective.
False rape accusations are terrible and can ruin lives (and have). But actual rape is terrible and ruins lives as well, and many women don't even come forward. Despite the RS story being a farce, several college women spoke up about their own sexual assault experiences.
It kinda shows you how prevalent actual sexual assault is. That all said, I wish certain men in the "manosphere" did more to be vocal against sexual violence, as much as they speak out against false claims. Because men who prey on women are a detriment to the betterment of men as a whole.