The Clydesdale Factor... goodbye HB scale!

MDgood

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
389
Reaction score
0
Location
East Middle North America, near the water.
There's been a lot of talk back and forth about what constitutes an HB 8, HB 9, HB 10, etc. However, the inherent problem with this is that a man's opinion of beauty is subjective, and the HB scale is an attempt to be objective about beauty: We are trying to place an absolute value on the beauty of a woman as if it's attached to a tag on their backs, when in fact beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Our rating system is, therefore, greatly skewed and bound to cause catastrophic confusion and resultant political revolution.

Therefore, gentlemen, allow me to introduce to you a rating system that was used to great effect when I was in high school and college. It is a subjective rating scale, taking into account a man's singular feeling of desire in of a woman. In other words, it allows men to rate woman based on the amount of desire she makes them feel. In doing so, all subjective preferences that all men feel towards a woman based on her age, her hair color, body type, eyes, personality, etc., are therefore cancelled out, leaving nothing but a raw, true, relative measure. Gentlemen, I give to you:

The Clydesdale Factor.

Yes, the Clydesdale Factor is representative of the number of large team horses it would take to pull a woman off your face. Therefore, one man's CF 2 woman is equal to another man's CF 2 woman: regardless of the individual woman's appearance or personality, it would take two Clydesdales to drag each woman off of the respective man's face, because that's the level of desire that each man feels.

Allow me to give a graphic explanation, using two scenarios:

In scenario #1, you have Denise Richards sitting on your face. Most men would feel a large amount of sexual desire for this woman. In walks a man with a harness with which he proceeds to schackle up Ms. Richards to a Clydesdale. You are so filled with desire to keep her on your face, the first Clydesdale wears out trying to pull against you. A second team horse must be attached. Still no luck, both horses wear out. Three horses. Four. Five. Six horses won't do it. But 7... yes, the force you need employ to keep Denise Richards on your face is not worth the effort of fighting against 7 team horses, and you let go. Therefore, Ms. Richards is one man's CF 7.

In scenario #2, you meet a girl you know from 7th grade, Annie Johnson, in a bar. It's 20 years later, and Ms. Johnson is now a bit frumpled. However, when you were 12 years old Annie was one hot perky number, and you spent more time spanking your newfound monkey while thinking of her that right now the thought of finally be able to nail her has given you a boner you haven't seen since that porno in college. Finally, after years of fantasy, it's showtime! Ms. Richards is being dragged down the hall by 7 team horses, and Ms. Johnson assumes the position. The man walks in and harnesses her to a Clydesdale. One team horse can't do it... you're finally getting some, and she ain't going. Two is a no go. Nor three, four, or five. This time it's personal! Six doesn't work, but with the seventh team horse off flys Annie Johnson from your face and down the hall. Annie Johnson is also a CF 7. She may not physically be Denise Richards, but she has caused you an equal amount of desire.

Gentlemen, an internet forum like this, where we'll never see these women of whom the others' speak, is the best place to utilize the Clydesdale factor. Like most inventions born of true brilliance, it will revolutionize the way we discuss women on this forum.

Thank you.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2003
Messages
896
Reaction score
0
Location
Fayetteville, Arkansas
man, you need to get off the cocaine and make this clearer before I piledrive you and that fool Clydesdale through a table!!
 

Julius_Caesar

Don Juan
Joined
Mar 15, 2003
Messages
134
Reaction score
0
Age
37
That has to be the most Fvcked up thing I have ever heard, except for this starman quote:
I think Im going to hide polar bears on my c0ck or inside of a chicken (...) and (..) Choke the chicken Until a Polar Bear Comes Out!
 

Peebold

Don Juan
Joined
Apr 6, 2003
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
This makes absolutley no sense, as different men can have different ammounts of desire for the same girl. Different guy, different turn-ons (desire). The only thing this could possible be useful for is measuring how much a girl weighs. And I think the fattest girls would only take 3 CFs to get them off of you.
 

Duke

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 16, 2003
Messages
915
Reaction score
17
Age
38
Location
Louisiana
This is essentially the same as the HB scale. A 7 on the HB scale would be 7 horses on your scale. Everybody knows that the HB scale is subjective.
 

journey

Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2003
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
So is this like the metric system I keep hearing about?
 

Metaphor

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Feb 12, 2003
Messages
251
Reaction score
0
That'd make sense if it would actually take more then one clydesdale per girl. I mean, no way you can resist a horse's pull, especially in that type of position. So it essentially comes down who is better at exxagerating and using hyperboles to describe their women. WTF..that's one of the strangest things I've ever heard.
 

princelydeeds

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
645
Reaction score
41
Location
Pittsburgh, Pa
You get an A for effort man. You deserve some positive fedback for the effort you put into the system. I liked the system, probably wouldnt use it, but nice try, nice system.
 

IDMeansNothing

Don Juan
Joined
Jun 19, 2003
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Location
Just south
Metaphor - WTF, dude? You an english major? Your post lives up to your screenname! LOL <no slam - just connecting dots>
 

T-4ze

Don Juan
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
..................Anyways, I met this HB that was a 9, she was f'in hot, I just couldn't resist...she had three friends with her a HB 8 and two 7's...I was like daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamn.



With all humor and sarcasm put aside...you are right on the fact that the HB scale is subjective..but probably 60% of the systems that we operate in are subjective...that's just the way it is, you can't change that..but the Clydesdale factor isn't much less subjective than the HB scale because a man's desire might as well be even MORE skewed than a man's physical attraction to a woman.

The HB scale is too far established, something that you just can't change because everyone is used to it, I much rather enjoy looking at some fine ass HB and go "Damn she's a 9," rather than taking 10 minutes thinking to myself..."Okay she has nice lips, that'll take one horse...she got that booty, make that 3 more...hmm her chest is average, that'll be one...what else might give her more horses"... within that time the girl will be long gone.

But I'm with princelydeeds, I gotta give you an A for effort cause you must have spent a lot of time on this.
 

MDgood

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
389
Reaction score
0
Location
East Middle North America, near the water.
Originally posted by journey
So is this like the metric system I keep hearing about?
Exactly... something like that... I think they use it in the more world of science and academia :)

This, of course, somehow evolved as a joke between me and my friends a long time ago. For some odd reason it just popped in my head and brought back some memories, so I thought I would share it. :D

(And for the record, yes, I highly doubt any man could hold onto a woman sitting on his face while a horse is trying to pull her off. Maybe it's been tried, but I'll have to do an internet seach on "beastiality Clydesdale" to make sure... ;) )
 

Psycho`Sexual

Don Juan
Joined
Jul 15, 2003
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
Age
36
Location
Asheville, NC, USA
Great Idea

But its already in use, I naturally assume that when someone speaks of a HB 9, then he judges her a 9, I might feel like she is a 7.

This has been proved already by a thread in anything else, where a lot of guys tried to rate some woman, they ranged from 9 down to 3 I think.


When a person says "she was a nine" they are giving a subjective opinion, but still good point in bringing this up.
 

Metaphor

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Feb 12, 2003
Messages
251
Reaction score
0
Not an English major. I'm just used to typing with proper Engligh because I used to play online games all the time. Got out of those and thank God, though.
 

Julian

Banned
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
4,789
Reaction score
1,232
Worst idea evar.
 

Pimp-sicle

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 27, 2003
Messages
2,462
Reaction score
101
Location
Pimpsylvania
That's the most fuked up rating's scale I've ever heard of, EVER!!

Here's a better one. There are five catergories. Face, tits, ass, legs & personality. Each catergory is a 0-2 scale. So the highest a girl could be is obiviously a 10, but that NEVER happens with this scale. Half scores are acceptable, the accuracy of this scale is perfection.

Example: Your walking down the street and you see Pam Anderson: Let's rate her

Face: 1.5
Tits : 2 :D
ass: 1.5
legs: 1.5
personality: 1.5

So on my scale Pam Anderson would be a HB 8. I personally don't think she's that hot, she wears too much make-up and is a little too thin at times. But she has an incredible set of tits, a spunky, energetic personality and has a good a-ss. So therefore she's an 8.
 

coin

Don Juan
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
MD man, I thought it was funny. Don't let the other haters get you down.
 
Top