Purefilth
Master Don Juan
+1^^
P.s. my jokes by text always get laughs
P.s. my jokes by text always get laughs
Hello Friend,
If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.
It will be the most efficient use of your time.
And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.
Thank you for visiting and have a great day!
Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
No one is wrong here.Starkwell said:Well, here's another long winded anti text rant from Harry Wilmington. I think Harry should disable his text messaging feature on his cell phone because he feels that it is not of any use. Text messaging is a powerful tool, if you use it correctly, it will work to your advantage everytime.....
.........
Text messaging doesn't kill relationships, guys themselves do.
BeginningDJ said:No one is wrong here.
Do you know how many text messages women get these days? Just notice an average women at the bar and see how many times her iPhone goes off. Would you call and tell her that you had a great day and found $5 on the ground? Then....why would you text that? That is what most men do. They want to build some connection to the prospect without the fear of rejection.
I have success with asking a girl out on dates via text, but talking to her allows you to see her interest. Her "ums" and "mmhs" go a long way. The main point in setting up a date is to gauge her interest in you. Texting won't suffice.
BeginningDJ said:Read what I posted again, dear Starkwell.
Poor game is poor game, regardless of what exchanges take place.
Texting doesn't prevent you from being successful, no one is disagreeing with that. If she find you the best option, texting will be in your favor, along with Facebook messaging, Skype, relaying the message through her friend. The point I was trying to make is that you need to hear what her interest level is by hearing what she says.
The texts you are describing is when the girl is into you.Starkwell said:Victory Unlimited said that "Texting is a POOR excuse for an actual phone conversation with a girl." That is totally false. Chicks love to text and you should incorporate that into your game if you are smart. Chicks act more freely with text messaging. They will say things they normally wouldn't say to you face to face or by phone. They will be more sexual through text and you can get them thinking about you throughout the day. When I have a chick telling me through text that she wants to "feel my hands on her t!ts, and my tongue on her cl!t, and later my d!ck in her mouth, and then deep inside her. I would say that is a great conversation with a girl, wouldn't you? Because later on, I will be in her pvssy for most of the night. And yes, my friends, that is through text messaging, it is not a poor excuse, and it certainly didn't kill a relationship.
Don't blame communication, or great tools we have available for us to use, as a way to make excuses for a guy's lack of game or personality. Because you could blame everything under the sun. In the end it is the guy, pure and simple.
It gets to be quite nauseating seeing the same anti text garbage over and over again, mostly by the same people who always want to blame a text for a guy's failures with women.
Text messaging doesn't kill relationships, guys themselves do.
You're probably right. To be honest with you, I rarely use the phone in the first place - the only time I tend to talk with girls is when they call me or text me. GIRLS are supposed to be the chatty ones on phone, not men.Starkwell said:Well, here's another long winded anti text rant from Harry Wilmington. I think Harry should disable his text messaging feature on his cell phone because he feels that it is not of any use.
And I agree with you. However, if you look at the majority of the posts on these boards, they usually involve some story about a text message situation going bad - either they said something that was taken wrong, or they got all panicky when she suddenly stopped sending messages back. I'm all about doing things to lessen a guy's stress level, and texting seems to be one of those things where guys are quick to over-react to stuff.Starkwell said:Text messaging is a powerful tool, if you use it correctly, it will work to your advantage everytime. These guys like to go on and on about how bad texting is, probably because it never worked out for them, and then they try to give their "spin" on it to the rest of us. But for the guys who use it to their advantage, and know how well it works for them, laugh at how totally wrong and how "green" these guys really are with women.
You might be right. With that said, though, if a guy is bad at texting, he should stop using it until he gets better interacting with women in person. There's no need for him to continue using a form of communication that he is bad at if he's not getting the results he wants. Again, he can learn about how to do it later, but at the end of the day it's not the best form of communication to use with a woman. Which, by the way, leads me to this other thing you said...Starkwell said:Texting itself does not kill a relationship, it is the person that kills the relationship, pure and simple.
If guys really did every single thing to get a chick that they claim to like, we'd all be single. Know what else girls claim to like? Nice guys; someone sensitive; a guy that's vulnerable and not afraid to cry; a guy who will watch the occasional chick flick; a real gentleman... I could go on.Starkwell said:Chicks love to text and you should incorporate that into your game if you are smart. Chicks act more freely with text messaging. They will say things they normally wouldn't say to you face to face or by phone. They will be more sexual through text and you can get them thinking about you throughout the day.
That's true - again, that's why I keep interactions with the girls I'm seeing limited when I'm not around them. Ironically, I find that when you haven't text or called a girl up during the days in between dates, it allows you to build up enough experiences to where you don't sound boring to her when you're on the date because you have things to talk about. On the other hand, if you're hitting her up everyday, you'll always be seen as boring when you meet up because you've already told her all the new stuff you had going on during the times when you weren't together.Starkwell said:It is up to the guy, if he has poor game, then he will fail regardless of whatever method he uses. I wonder if Harry would blame the iPhone for a terrible conversation that a guy has with a girl. You could even blame the guy's own voice for what he says. Right? If you send long or lots of boring texts, or if you if bug a chick all day by calling her, or if you are boring on a date with her, then she will lose interest in you faster than a fly on a turd.
I don't agree with everything concerning this... but this, this right here is the biggest gem guys need to remember.Harry Wilmington said:On the other hand, if you're hitting her up everyday, you'll always be seen as boring when you meet up because you've already told her all the new stuff you had going on during the times when you weren't together.
+1Trump said:The texts you are describing is when the girl is into you.
I agree with this. If you know what you are doing, texting can raise interest. If you don't know what you're doing, it can hurt.omega05 said:yall are writing essays over whether texting is good or bad. it is not that serious.
Yes, she was into me and I was in her. But you can also use text messaging to see if a girl is into you or not.Trump said:The texts you are describing is when the girl is into you..
Yes, but that also can happen over the phone and in person conversations as well. Maybe your c0cky and funny approach didn't work out so well and she took it as an insult. Maybe she didn't catch on to your sarcasm. Maybe your wittiness wasn't that funny. It is how the guy acts, and what he does, is what matters. Saying that texting is "killing relationships" is not accurate because it is the guy's crappy overall game is what did it. See what I am saying?Trump said:I think the main issue Harry is trying to at is texting can be very judgemental, can be interpreted in so many ways, you try to be funny and witty and it doesn't work. Plus, it can make you vulnerable, you expect a response back 30 sec to something witty you think you said and it takes 3 hours.
She could tell you in person or over the phone that she misses you, loves you, wants to screw you, etc, and still be the screwing other guys. A text doesn't make one damn bit of difference. A hoe is a hoe my friend. Again, the text itself isn't the problem with what you describe. It is the girl herself that is the problem. The text is just an excuse to use for a lack of a bad game or the chick being a hoe.Trump said:My issue with text is when she says she loves you, misses you, can't live without you, wants to screw you, cries about you, wishes you never left her, she could be screwing another guy while she is texting all that. Or trying to get you to respond emotionally so she can show her girlfriends or the guy she is chasing how much power she has over you and value she has.
.
Starkwell said:Well, here's another long winded anti text rant from Harry Wilmington. I think Harry should disable his text messaging feature on his cell phone because he feels that it is not of any use. Text messaging is a powerful tool, if you use it correctly, it will work to your advantage everytime. These guys like to go on and on about how bad texting is, probably because it never worked out for them, and then they try to give their "spin" on it to the rest of us. But for the guys who use it to their advantage, and know how well it works for them, laugh at how totally wrong and how "green" these guys really are with women.
Victory Unlimited and Harry Wilmington are both wrong. Texting itself does not kill a relationship, it is the person that kills the relationship, pure and simple. First of all, they weren't in a relationship. If anything else, it is the text messaging that saved this guy from being with a chick that has no sense of humor and one that never had much interest in him in the first place. Otherwise, she would of wanted to chill with him regardless of what his text said. The text was her excuse not to chill with him, but she would of used another one to use anyway, so please don't blame a text for the lack of interest on her part. Why would you want to chill with a chick who has no sense of humor or one that has low IL? Anybody care to chime in on this? The text showed him what this chick was all about. She has zero sense of humor and clearly wasn't interested in this guy. Text messaging is the best way to gauge IL pure and simple.
Let's look at this another way Harry. He could of said the same thing over the phone, or even in person, and she still would of taken it the wrong way because she couldn't catch on to the sarcasm, or used it as an excuse to not hang out with the guy. If a chick is into you she doesn't take things the wrong way and still would find what he said to be funny. She certainly wouldn't of used it an a excuse not to chill with him. Chicks with low IL will use anything you say, or do, as a way not to hang out with you, regardless if it is through, text, phone, or face to face conversation. Once again, it is the guy, not the texting.
Victory Unlimited said that "Texting is a POOR excuse for an actual phone conversation with a girl." That is totally false. Chicks love to text and you should incorporate that into your game if you are smart. Chicks act more freely with text messaging. They will say things they normally wouldn't say to you face to face or by phone. They will be more sexual through text and you can get them thinking about you throughout the day. When I have a chick telling me through text that she wants to "feel my hands on her t!ts, and my tongue on her cl!t, and later my d!ck in her mouth, and then deep inside her. I would say that is a great conversation with a girl, wouldn't you? Because later on, I will be in her pvssy for most of the night. And yes, my friends, that is through text messaging, it is not a poor excuse, and it certainly didn't kill a relationship.
It is up to the guy, if he has poor game, then he will fail regardless of whatever method he uses. I wonder if Harry would blame the iPhone for a terrible conversation that a guy has with a girl. You could even blame the guy's own voice for what he says. Right? If you send long or lots of boring texts, or if you if bug a chick all day by calling her, or if you are boring on a date with her, then she will lose interest in you faster than a fly on a turd. It is the guy who fails or succeeds with women.
Don't blame communication, or great tools we have available for us to use, as a way to make excuses for a guy's lack of game or personality. Because you could blame everything under the sun. In the end it is the guy, pure and simple.
It gets to be quite nauseating seeing the same anti text garbage over and over again, mostly by the same people who always want to blame a text for a guy's failures with women.
Text messaging doesn't kill relationships, guys themselves do.
Your point is wrong Harry. When a girl is into you, and wants you, that is exactly what she wants, and what she wants you to do to her.Harry Wilmington said:The point is, just 'cause a girl claims she likes something doesn't mean she wants the guy she's dating to do it.
Neither do I. I text a girl when I want, not when she wants. That is what being a real man is all about.Harry Wilmington said:Personally, I don't give a crap about a girl wanting me to message her -
Again, when the girl is into you, the desire will still be there. Your false claim of sending a text won't kill that desire as you claim. She will have more desire, when she is turned on, or when she is thinking about you even more from that text. If you knew anything about women and the female mind you would know this already.Harry Wilmington said:I WANT that desire in her to be there so that she's even happier to see/hear from me when I see her in PERSON.
This is what you don't understand about text messaging, game, and women in general Harry. You use text to get down to business and straight to the point with the girl. There is no situation to be in. It is what you want, not what she feels like, and you don't have to be at her beck and call. Guys with no experience talk like this, and make excuses for things they don't know about, or things that don't work for them. That is why you advocate this all the time in your postings.Harry Wilmington said:I don't ever put myself in a situation where I have to be at her beck and call every time she feels like it -
I'm sorry Harry, it does not. You as a man, are under no obligation to chit chat with useless texting, just as talking on the phone, or in person. If you get down to business and straight to the point, it will work wonders for you, just as it does for other experienced men on here, who all agree with me, and not with you.Harry Wilmington said:and that's one of the things text messaging does. -
And you are being lost in the shuffle, while other men with real game, are screwing the women you want to be with, while you sit on the sidelines being a spectator. You wait with your iPhone in your hand, to set up the dates with the chicks, but then they start flaking on you, because other guys catch their interest instead. Because they were being real men getting what they want, while the insecure guys just sit idle and stand by waiting with their iPhone in hand. Sounds familiar Harry? This happens all the time to guys who are afraid to use all the tools that are provided for them, and worrying about what women think of them, because they were too weak and timid to be a man. You advocate this in all your postings Harry. That is wrong.Harry Wilmington said:That's why I let them know from day one that I'm not much of a phone person, and that I only use it to set up appointments with people/friends or dates.
There are no expectations to set up with them. You don't need to be texting or calling them all the time. If you get down to business, and to the point, it works wonders. That is something you don't understand.Harry Wilmington said:I don't set up expectations in them that I'm going to be texting/calling them all the time,
Harry Wilmington said:but I somehow still managed to get laid -
We haven't seen any proof of that Harry...only your words. Again, if you compact your game and use it wisely, there isn't much extra communication to be used. If you knew that, and had experience with it, you would understand that, and wouldn't be spouting your false "text relationship killing" threads.Harry Wilmington said:proof that all that extra communication isn't necessary.
Well, you should care Harry, because it really amps them up when you do that, but you wouldn't know anything about that because you don't text them. Right?Harry Wilmington said:Furthermore, I don't care how care-free girls sound via text,
Doesn't matter what she uses to say it Harry, as long as she is sucking your d!ck. Right? That should be your goal. Not what method she uses before she performs the act. Again, when they are into you, they will say it to you in any form of communication. Doesn't matter which one, as long as the interest is there. That is why your claim is false about text messaging.Harry Wilmington said:I want them to say it in person.
You are an anti text messaging guy Harry, so you don't believe in or care about texts like that, as you just said above. Right? Yes, it is nice having those texts, which completely contradicts everything you have been saying about "texting killing relationships" in all these threads. I'm glad you finally agree with me and see how my point is correct, and how yours is wrong. Doesn't sound like those words killed the relationship...does it?Harry Wilmington said:You know what's nice? Having a girl text you things like "I want you to feel my boobs and lick me down, then later I'll suck on your d!ck."
Yes it is Harry, but with the text, she will be thinking about that long before she is doing that to you in person. Again, a text didn't kill it, it just made it better. She was anticipating doing that to you before she was actually doing it, which make it even better. Right Harry?Harry Wilmington said:You know what's even BETTER? Having a girl actually riding you hard while she's whispering that same sentence into your ear.
Well, of course they will Harry. They will also say it to you in a text, so then you can go over and have sex with them,. after the texts got them all hot and wet, while they were waiting for you and thinking about what they want to do to you. Not sure how a text would kill that as you claim.Harry Wilmington said:And girls WILL say this stuff in person if they're comfortable with you and confident in themselves.
If you knew anything about women Harry, or had women wanting you, after you got her sexy text, she would be sucking your d!ck in real life, because she wanted you. Her sexy text is just a preview of what is about to come.Harry Wilmington said:I don't want a girl who can only give these sentiments via text - her sexy text is not gonna suck my d!ck in real life