I’m trying to have a discussion here but you keep arguing with fabricated facts, irrelevant details, and hypothetical scenarios. When I address these points, you become defensive and resort to personal attacks instead of debating the issues. This behavior is an example of the Ad Hominem fallacy, which involves attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself. I bet you didn’t know this but it is what you have been doing your last posts.
I understand that you’ve been a member since 2008 and may feel that you need to defend your reputation and status on this forum. It seems important to you to "win" this argument to prove your worth and fit in with other more tenured members. Not sure if you are up to the same level as them but that is beside the point. However, resorting to personal attacks and irrelevant points only undermines your position. Other members here are more articulate and constructive in their debates, especially the ones that have been here as long as you. Claiming that I didn’t read your researcher paper is not only disingenuous but saying that I didn’t understand it because I am ESL is prejudiced.
I thought you blocked me anyways. So again, not only going back on your word (it is the second time you said you were not going to respond back) but again, moving up the goalpost to win the argument. Throwing a tantrum like you are doing is manchild’s behaviour; it reflects poorly on your ability to handle disagreements maturely. Maybe try to grow up a hold onto your word.
