"I'm Not Looking for Anything Serious Right Now"

When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.

Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.

Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.

The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.

Read more...

Teenage girl "humiliated" for being told to cover up

Dali_tx_o

Don Juan
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
81
Reaction score
5
Location
Somewhere
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/publicemployees.htm
http://canons.sog.unc.edu/?p=3319

"You have a constitutional right to say and think as you will, but you have no constitutional right to work for the government."

Which means, when working in a governmental position certain restrictions apply to your freedom of speech in a sense that you are free to express your opinion, but so is your employer is free to fire you for your statements if they are not following the policies of the institution, (or at least that is my quick interpretation. If there's someone studying American Law, feel free to correct me.)


However, as a citizen, you are free to call anyone you want "Slut", "Fat", "*****" or whatever tickles your pickle, without any legal repercussions, as long as it is your personal opinion/expression/etc. You are not, however, free of criticism or social repercussions.

So, to recap:
You are free to dress however you want as an act of expressing oneself.
You are not free of criticism, finger pointing, laughter or remarks about how "you should cover up, because I think you look trashy".


You are also free to say someone looks like a slut.
You are not free of someone criticizing your opinion that someone is a slut. (for example, by taking a picture of aforementioned girl and saying "she doesn't look like a slut, and that's why")

You are also free to post and comment the situation, calling either of the involved parties anything ranging from "Unlucky victims" to "Full-blown-tards"

That's the beauty of the market of free ideas. The whole story is only about people exercising their rights, and as long as it is expression of opinion, IT IS THEIR PROTECTED RIGHT to do so. If you are American and think otherwise, I strongly suggest reading the First Amendment.


The TSA agent, however, could or could not get fired from his position at TSA, depending on their policies, for voicing his opinion in such position.


So, yes, under everyday circumstances, TSA agent should not have said that, however, saying he "Can't say that" is not true either. He can, he just might lose his job over it.
 

"You'll Never Feel READY to Walk Over"

Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.

You've been "getting ready" for two years.

She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.

Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.

Read more...

cordoncordon

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
2,889
Reaction score
109
Dali_tx_o said:
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/publicemployees.htm
http://canons.sog.unc.edu/?p=3319

"You have a constitutional right to say and think as you will, but you have no constitutional right to work for the government."

Which means, when working in a governmental position certain restrictions apply to your freedom of speech in a sense that you are free to express your opinion, but so is your employer is free to fire you for your statements if they are not following the policies of the institution, (or at least that is my quick interpretation. If there's someone studying American Law, feel free to correct me.)


However, as a citizen, you are free to call anyone you want "Slut", "Fat", "*****" or whatever tickles your pickle, without any legal repercussions, as long as it is your personal opinion/expression/etc. You are not, however, free of criticism or social repercussions.

So, to recap:
You are free to dress however you want as an act of expressing oneself.
You are not free of criticism, finger pointing, laughter or remarks about how "you should cover up, because I think you look trashy".


You are also free to say someone looks like a slut.
You are not free of someone criticizing your opinion that someone is a slut. (for example, by taking a picture of aforementioned girl and saying "she doesn't look like a slut, and that's why")

You are also free to post and comment the situation, calling either of the involved parties anything ranging from "Unlucky victims" to "Full-blown-tards"

That's the beauty of the market of free ideas. The whole story is only about people exercising their rights, and as long as it is expression of opinion, IT IS THEIR PROTECTED RIGHT to do so. If you are American and think otherwise, I strongly suggest reading the First Amendment.


The TSA agent, however, could or could not get fired from his position at TSA, depending on their policies, for voicing his opinion in such position.


So, yes, under everyday circumstances, TSA agent should not have said that, however, saying he "Can't say that" is not true either. He can, he just might lose his job over it.
Exactly my contention all along during this thread.
 
Top