"So, What Do You Do for Fun?"

She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.

Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.

The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.

Read more...

Supreme Court Hearing Gay Marriage Argument

"She Laughed All Night. Then She Ghosted You. Here's Why."

Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.

Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?

You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.

Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.

Read more...

Stagger Lee

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
2,159
Reaction score
138
The wealthy elitist want gay marriage nationwide so that's what the Supreme Court will deliver.

It's not the supreme court's power to decide but they'll decide it anyway. (unconstitutional) Legislation by 5 federal judges.

Gays don't really want state recognized marriages, they want to force all private individuals to fully accept their sexual choices and to be protected as a special class. That's the problem.

Gays could just got gay civil unions bestowing the same rights and benefits legalized through the legislature, and leave private individuals and conscientious objectors such as in the wedding services industry alone. But no it's not about gay unions at all.
 

( . )( . )

Banned
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
4,873
Reaction score
177
Location
Cobra Kai dojo

Peña

Banned
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Messages
493
Reaction score
14
5-4 making a mockery of marriage with a sham marriage. Fringe groups again turining the country upside down.
 

"She Made Her Decision Before You Finished Your Sentence"

Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.

She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.

Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.

So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.

The words come later. The impression comes first.

Read more...

speed dawg

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
4,735
Reaction score
1,223
Location
The Dirty South
Serious question.....why can't marriage be defined as a union between and man and woman, AND some other type of agreement be worked out between gays that legally entitles them to each others' sh*t? I don't get that. Why the big deal about the word 'marriage'?

I think this is all another ploy by the people behind the scenes (who are in this for the money), manipulating the do-good sh*t-libs. A reasonable resolution could be had, but that's not the objective.
 

Jaylan

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 8, 2011
Messages
3,119
Reaction score
133
Peña said:
5-4 making a mockery of marriage with a sham marriage. Fringe groups again turining the country upside down.
The majority of Americans support equal marriage rights for all Americans. Thats hardly a fringe. Do your research.
speed dawg said:
Serious question.....why can't marriage be defined as a union between and man and woman, AND some other type of agreement be worked out between gays that legally entitles them to each others' sh*t? I don't get that. Why the big deal about the word 'marriage'?

I think this is all another ploy by the people behind the scenes (who are in this for the money), manipulating the do-good sh*t-libs. A reasonable resolution could be had, but that's not the objective.
Why does it bother you if people are allowed to define marriage any way they want to in their own personal relationships? Why should the government be allowed to deny people the ability to freely define their private life?

The reasonable resolution is that all people should have equal rights in this. Its not like organized religion created marriage...and its not like religious people truly see marriage as so sacred (when you consider infidelity and divorce rates). So I personally see no good argument why all Americans cannot freely define marriage for themselves.

No one will force religious institutions to marry homosexuals. So people need to get over it and let people live their lives. It harms no one if two homosexuals call their long term union marriage. It changes nothing about two heterosexual people's marriage either.

Time to give this one up. 36 states already have it as legal...so there's really no going back now.
 

Stagger Lee

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
2,159
Reaction score
138
Jaylan said:
Why does it bother you if people are allowed to define marriage any way they want to in their own personal relationships? Why should the government be allowed to deny people the ability to freely define their private life?
It's not defining their private life when they are asking for state benefits, privileges and protections traditionally married couples receive. Neither is forcing wedding service providers to serve gay weddings their private life.



The reasonable resolution is that all people should have equal rights in this.
So why not allow for polygamy, incest etc? Everyone already has equal rights. Any straight, gay male or female can marry the opposite sex.

Its not like organized religion created marriage...and its not like religious people truly see marriage as so sacred (when you consider infidelity and divorce rates). So I personally see no good argument why all Americans cannot freely define marriage for themselves.
First off religion did create marriage and pre-dates history let alone the US government. But it's not even about religion. You can define marriage how ever you want in a private ceremony, but you are asking the state to license it and forcing other private individual to accept your definition of marriage.


No one will force religious institutions to marry homosexuals. So people need to get over it and let people live their lives. It harms no one if two homosexuals call their long term union marriage. It changes nothing about two heterosexual people's marriage either.
BS gays will next demand any church that hosts traditional marriages to host their gay wedding. Besides, gays have already infringed on Christian wedding service providers. It's not about what homosexuals call their union, it's about what the state calls it and forcing others to fully accept it.
 

Stagger Lee

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
2,159
Reaction score
138
PairPlusRoyalFlush said:
5-4 against gay marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment as a constitutional right, 5-4 the other way on gay marriages in some states being forcibly recognize by the states under the comity clause/Full Faith and Credit Clause.
That would be the best case scenario one could expect, but I think it will be 5-4 for gay marriage based on not allowing same-sex marriage is discrimination based on sex.

I think the court will side step the sexual orientation matter. Chief Roberts will tip it 5-4 to require gay marriage based on the argument that not allowing same-sex marriage is discrimination based on a persons sex.

"Sue loves Joe and Tom also loves Joe, but Sue can marry Joe, while Tom can’t, he said. “Why isn’t that a straightforward case of sexual discrimination?” he asked.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/antonin-scalia-and-john-roberts-question-gay-marriage-opponents-2015-4#ixzz3YjC02NFi"

If the Court finds against requiring gay marriage, wouldn't that reverse gay marriage in several states the federal judges forced? I don't see that happening.
 

speed dawg

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
4,735
Reaction score
1,223
Location
The Dirty South
Jaylan said:
Why does it bother you if people are allowed to define marriage any way they want to in their own personal relationships? Why should the government be allowed to deny people the ability to freely define their private life?
:rolleyes: It's like arguing with a woman. When in doubt, shame.

Jaylan said:
The reasonable resolution is that all people should have equal rights in this. Its not like organized religion created marriage...and its not like religious people truly see marriage as so sacred (when you consider infidelity and divorce rates). So I personally see no good argument why all Americans cannot freely define marriage for themselves.
Well, no, because marriage IS a religious institution, always has been. So if gays want equal rights, so be it. But it isn't a marriage. The government is making a mistake in recognize marriage in any form, if they truly want to separate church and state.

Jaylan said:
No one will force religious institutions to marry homosexuals.
Yes they will. Yes they absolutely will. It's next on the agenda. At minimum, they will yank their tax exempt status.

Jaylan said:
So people need to get over it and let people live their lives. Time to give this one up.
When you can't get people to agree, SHAME some more!
 

"She Wants a Man, Not a Boy"

You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.

Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.

Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.

Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.

Read more...

amoka

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
1,931
Reaction score
62
speed dawg said:
Serious question.....why can't marriage be defined as a union between and man and woman, AND some other type of agreement be worked out between gays that legally entitles them to each others' sh*t? I don't get that. Why the big deal about the word 'marriage'?
Very comical. What "type of arrangement" would you prefer to be "worked out"? You want it to walk like a duck, quacks like a duck, moves like a duck, but it should not be called a duck?
 

Peña

Banned
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Messages
493
Reaction score
14
Jaylan said:
The majority of Americans support equal marriage rights for all Americans. Thats hardly a fringe. Do your research.
Do yours. Only 2% difference. The country is split. Gays are smaller in numbers being fringe telling the majority what it should be.




Jaylan said:
Why does it bother you if people are allowed to define marriage any way they want to in their want to in their own personal relationships? Why should the government be allowed to deny people the ability to freely define their private life?
Why should a fringe group snap their fingers forcing us to accept a sham marriage as normal? Gays decide they want to be married so we all have to give them what they want. Selfish people trying to steal marriage benefits and wanting fake families saying being different is normal. Personally they are free in their private lives to live freely. Does not mean they should have a right to be married making a mockery of it.
 

Peña

Banned
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Messages
493
Reaction score
14
Bible_Belt said:
If two dudes can marry, why can't I have two wives? That's what I want to know.
I was just going to say that. It should be that way since they turned marriage upside down. The fringe want gays to have legal marriage. Why can't a small group have more than one wife? Gay supporters say why should the government be allowed to deny people the ability to freely define their private life? Shouldn't that apply to me wanting another wife if I want?

Jaylan said:
The majority of Americans support equal marriage rights for all Americans. Thats hardly a fringe. Do your research.
Do your research. Gay marriage was voted down each time it came on the ballot over 20 years ago. They cried foul each time trying to get it reinstated until they forced the courts to vote on it. The issue should be dead years ago. Government has the authority to define laws. The fringe don't like it so they forced it to be changed.
 

Stagger Lee

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
2,159
Reaction score
138
Bible_Belt said:
If two dudes can marry, why can't I have two wives? That's what I want to know.
I want to marry my elderly mother (so I can receive her social security and survivor benefits). Why can't I marry a relative not even the same sex? That's what I want to know. I want a lesbian to make the mother marriage cake too :D.


Here's what else can happen when gays marry, questions of child support and custody and assets. That's when it's good when it happens to them lol. Christian-made wedding cakes in their ass

Rosie O’Donnell and her ex, Michelle Rounds, are apparently in the middle of a custody battle that just got ugly. According to People Magazine, Rounds has requested sole custody of the couple’s 2-year-old daughter, Dakota, filing the request on Tuesday. Her lawyer stated that Rounds feels as though it is in the child’s best interest to be in her care, and that she will provide a better environment for Dakota. Naturally, Rosie disagrees.


“This is an absurd and desperate attempt to use a child for her own gain,” said Rosie’s lawyer on Tuesday. The two women are now at odds over the child, who many feel is being put in the middle of what is turning out to be a bitter split.
 

"I just moved here from Florida."

That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?

She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."

She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.

I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.

Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.

Read more...

Bokanovsky

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
5,523
Reaction score
5,707
Stagger Lee said:
I want to marry my elderly mother (so I can receive her social security and survivor benefits). Why can't I marry a relative not even the same sex? That's what I want to know. I want a lesbian to make the mother marriage cake too :D.
Why stop with your mother? Marry your dad, uncles and nieces too. Who's to say marriage has to be between two individuals? Speaking of which, why does it have to be an individual? Why can't you marry a corporation? That would be great for income splitting purposes.
 

Stagger Lee

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
2,159
Reaction score
138
Bokanovsky said:
Why stop with your mother? Marry your dad, uncles and nieces too. Who's to say marriage has to be between two individuals? Speaking of which, why does it have to be an individual? Why can't you marry a corporation? That would be great for income splitting purposes.
I know right, but but but polygamy bad, corporation bad, relative bad..only gay good uh cause pro-gays say so!
 
Top