"The Kiss of Death Mistake"

You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?

Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.

One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.

Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Read more...

Squats

bud_2005

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
907
Reaction score
2
When you guys do squats do you do the kind where there are cables attachd to the barbell or do you do it the old-fashioned way where you take the barbell off the rack, step back 3 steps, and start squatting. The nice thing about the cables one is that you don't have to balance the bar but it seems like cheating a little.
 

"She Laughed All Night. Then She Ghosted You. Here's Why."

Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.

Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?

You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.

Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.

Read more...

spesmilitis

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
1,490
Reaction score
6
You are talking about the smith machine. Using the smith machine isn't the 'new-fashioned way', its the dumb-fashioned way.
 

BluEyes

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
606
Reaction score
9
Are you talking about attaching bands to the bar to stop bounce?

And yes, the "old-fashioned" way is the right way. The only time I'd advocate smith-machine is when dieting down and you need to mix things up. You shouldn't need to do that till you have an off-the-floor squat of like 500.
 

Drum&Bass

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
1,190
Reaction score
35
Age
46
Location
I travel
You shouldn't need to do that till you have an off-the-floor squat of like 500.
This is ridiculous and makes no sense. why would someone need a 500 lb squat to use a smith machine ??

Smith Machine squats are a great exercise, they are done differently than regular barbell back squats, and there is more emphasis on quadriceps. You should do smith squats in combination with regular squats and front squats, sticking only to conventional squats will give you great hamstrings and glutes but your quads will not be as nicely developed.

The nice thing about the cables one is that you don't have to balance the bar but it seems like cheating a little.
Smith squats are incredibly difficult, most likely your not using correct form, again its not executed the same way as a freeweight squat.
 

HK1

Don Juan
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Cables? Machines? never heard of them.

:D

The smith machine doesnt suit a person because the range of motion isnt natural. If you stand off to the side, most people squat in an arc, kind of like ( not exactly like that, but im sure you can understand what im saying. Also, you mentioned its Achilles heel. The balance, thats not something you want to lose.

Ive tried it, and it just feels very unnatural to me. If you're looking for a change in leg workouts, try giving 20-rep squats a whirl. Its a real ball buster so I wouldnt do it while dieting. You can always try a farmers walk, while doing lunges at the same time (2 birds, 1 stone), front squats, zercher squats are another one thats also taxing on your core.

They all get the heart racing.


BluEyes said:
Are you talking about attaching bands to the bar to stop bounce?
Bands...I actually miss those types of workouts. Cool thing with bands is you can incorporate them with damn near any core movement. The downside with them is how taxing they are on the CNS. I never used them longer then 4-6 weeks at a time, usually 4 weeks.

Chains can be fun too, damn things are expensive though.
 

"She Wants a Man, Not a Boy"

You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.

Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.

Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.

Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.

Read more...

spesmilitis

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
1,490
Reaction score
6
Drum&Bass said:
This is ridiculous and makes no sense. why would someone need a 500 lb squat to use a smith machine ??

Smith Machine squats are a great exercise, they are done differently than regular barbell back squats, and there is more emphasis on quadriceps. You should do smith squats in combination with regular squats and front squats, sticking only to conventional squats will give you great hamstrings and glutes but your quads will not be as nicely developed.

Smith squats are incredibly difficult, most likely your not using correct form, again its not executed the same way as a freeweight squat.
Again, I disagree with your post. Never use smith machines, unless you are very advanced.
 

Warboss Alex

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
4,113
Reaction score
29
smith machine squats are just glorified leg presses.

if you have a squat rack, use it. if you have no other way of training legs then do smith squats but the results will not be nearly as good as with free weights.

I agree with BluEyes. once you have built your base and need to cycle in smith squats (to give your lower back a rest for example) then do it, but do not make them your core leg/mass builder.
 
Top