Originally posted by Señor Fingers
Also from most of the gays/lesbians i know, they are not on some covert mission to infiltrate mainstream society. They want what we all want, to be accepted instead of persecuted.
Bottom line, I dont judge any of these people, nor do I believe that they are on some secret quest to take over mainstream society (althught the Feminists certainly give that impression). I think that these “agenda groups” are really just a symptom of something deeper...Your paranoia seems misplaced to me. Once again you seem to really believe that Mr. Faggyman is out to get us! Ultimately I do agree that the media has played their part in the distortion of human nature. You and I simply disagree on what is “natural”
No, ‘Fingers’, I’m not paranoid or delusional (a little crazy, maybe) nor am I God to ‘judge’ everyone’s actions (except my own). I make statements of reality and not judgments. Focus on my overall message…and not my terminology of ‘natural’ vs. ‘unnatural’ forces – this is what “I” call it and not demanding that you do the same. See my explanation below.
I take it you are 20-something years old, I don’t know. I’ve been following this issue for over 20 years, and my ‘observation’ has nothing to do with my stance on ‘homosexuality. This an ‘overt’ and not a covert mission, because homosexuals have stated that their whole goal was to be embraced by the mainstream and seek all its’ benefits derived from such. This was known and blatantly stated over 30 years ago, and the sole purpose of why they organized!
All this talk about changing laws and marriage and seeking health benefits, and influencing the masses by taking a hold of the media to push their agenda – this was told to us over 30 years ago, it is just now coming into fruition. There are many documentaries stating from homos that this is ‘their mission’ and exact ‘goal’. It has absolutely nothing to do with my thinking or so-called paranoia. This is the REALITY of things! No one can argue that this is not so, if they did their home-work
I’m simply stating the known and the obvious. And the ‘media’ is not an inanimate object, as people seem to refer to it as, there are ‘thinking people’ that make decisions of what to program on the airwaves, and it many times, has nothing to do with profits but an agenda.
My main focus in my second post was on the unnatural forces (hors, homos, feminists) behind the agenda in the media because this is the ‘ROOT” and immediate catalyst of why men and women, en masse, have changed their thinking (outlook) and thus their behavior, in the last 20 years. Do you really believe that you would have 10’s of millions of people thinking alike (chump behavior is only one example) and share a common trait and thinking if it wasn’t for mass ‘programming’ (literally and figuratively speaking) and consumption. I am not so naïve to think that mass communication was and is solely used for profit, and not for political, social, economical, educational ‘agenda’ setting Of course it is.
This SoSuave forum proves the case. We can instantly talk about many common interests we share and occurrences that just took place yesterday, although we live continents apart. How did we get these ‘common’ interests and ‘instant’ common experiences, if not through ‘mass’ media? This would be impossible and it was until the most few recent decades. The TV airwaves have been the main instrument of influence, because of the great impact of pictorial and voice communication, when combined (as opposed to radio or just print media).
100’s of millions of people around the world are now mimicking American culture in their dress, eating, music, thinking, behavior, as well as topics of discussion at the dinner table (political or social) and in many other ways. Some of this is done out of profit (purpose of advertising) but a good portion of the ‘content’ of the shows is programmed to form a ‘common’ social, cultural, or political or patriotic mindset, whether this is the ‘intended’ or ‘accidental’ consequences is not the issue, the important issue is that it does have a influence in our thinking and behavior, en masse!
So these ‘unnatural’ agenda-setting groups knew this 30 years ago and they have been successful with getting their message to the masses, have they not? Have you looked at all the positive press and commentary and shows that portray and gives ‘press’ to a man solely on the basis that he enjoys putting his penis in another man’s ass and how ‘proud’ he is to be judged as such a man. And other’s who find this as a perversion are suppose to accept his behavior and judge him as acceptable solely on this abominable act because those in the mass media tell us to? Huh??
And now homos want others to accept and respect them ‘solely’ on the foundation that he likes to kiss other men and put his penis in his ass!! Huh? I’m dumbfounded!! What such a narrow and perverted definition to judge a person by – I just don’t get it! This is insane at the root!!! And the masses are slowly accepting this sick message! And now they have advertising spots or ‘public announcements’ that advocate homos are diverse and we should embrace diversity! There are laws now that we should respect those who are so narrowly defined or else we are labeled as ‘haters’ or ‘homophobes’ or ‘criminals’, and we are committing a crime if we call them what they are.. Mr. Fingers, the ‘faggyman’ isn’t coming after us, he is already here and has us!!
To legitimatize their ill behavior and their so-called struggle, Homosexuals always try to crate a link between themselves and Black peoples’ torment and suffering in slavery and beyond, as if their cause has the same mistreatment and valor. Blacks had to go on national TV and make a statement to homos that they should immediately stop equating their sick conduct to the suffering of Blacks and that this juxtaposition was degrading to Blacks and diminishing the horribleness of their suffering and affliction. The gall of homos is limitless!!
Do you notice the distorted language fags use, “Sexual Preference”, “Sexual Orientation” and other dribble to try to create a legitimate image? I’m a “Homosapien”, how can I possibly be a “homophobe”. From changing the word ‘fag’ to ‘gay’, they have not only distorted our thinking but also our language! Gay use to mean, and still does, happy and gregarious. Do you see how they bastardized the language so that you can think of them in a good light and change your thinking of who they truly are. Fags try to make you think that you are a hater by asking themselves “how can anyone go against an individual for being happy and gregarious and being what we were naturally born with, it is our God-given orientation?” This is blasphemous talk is tiresome to hear.
For what purpose would they do this? You ask. They do this to make the ‘male’ seem to have a ‘female nature’ deep within them, a duality if you will, And that they are in touch with this softer side of their so-called manliness and encourage others to do the same. I have never seen so many men cry on TV and showing their ‘softer’ side, in the last year, than all the years past! This is done on purpose to show that men do have feminine features and it’s ok to express them. This weaker looking male portrayed on TV in the last decades has legitimized homos as if they are in their natural state (albeit more feminine than most men) and thus this is a natural condition that they are born with. So now it’s OK for men to embrace their feminine side since we have a dual male/female nature
This is a large portion of why you are starting to see effeminateness and AFC’ness become the norm and they (mass media) have now created another name for non-homosexuals who care and adorn themselves at the same expense and spend the same amount of time as their women counterparts – METROSEXUAL. ( notice the word ‘sexual’). Now we have “Queer eye for the straight guy” TV show being pushed and advertised everywhere. You think this is accident? You are very mistaken, my Latino friend! There is an ‘agenda’ at work here! You cannot change ‘mass consciousness’ without ‘mass appeal’. We must look at those who are at the ‘ROOT’ of changing this consciousness. Read my second post on this thread for further clarification!.
For us, the masses, to accept their ill-behavior and perverted lifestyle!!! They knew that only through ‘mass media’ can you change the thinking of the masses! They didn’t have this option 50 years ago and that is why 50 years and for thousands of years before that, the masses never accepted or embraced such a sick lifestyle with open arms as our youth today. Yes, homosexuality was around for thousands of years, but they never tried to persuade other that their conduct was good and natural. Only when the technology of TV come about did they realize that they had an attainable mission. And because TV has magnificent power to convey a message, hors and feminists have jumped on the bandwagon, and the result of this bombardment and onslaught of programming strong female/weak male portrayals and messages of the like, is that we now have our youth exhibiting ‘unnatural’ AFC and effeminate sexualized behavior!
We use to, and I still do, call them “effeminates”. Neither AFC or FAG behavior is ‘natural’. They both go against what nature intended; however fags are to the extreme!
