Well, here's some pretty scientific proof of something I've long suspected. We get told over-and-over-and-over again that men put way more emphasis on looks than women, and that women are held to "impossibly high social standards" for looks, but here's the bitter center of the proverbial pudding:
Your Looks And Online Dating, OK Cupid Trends Blog
OKC, a fairly large, free dating site (of which I've personally had no luck whatsoever meeting even one girl off) compiled the data on photo ratings of guys and girls, some ~300,000 ratings, and I'm not surprised at all at the result, but somehow still shocked.
Take a look at the two graphs representing the ratings.
Males rated females on a almost symmetrical "camel hump" if you will... better extrapolated, probably pretty close to the bell-curve that occurs in nature, with the bulk of lades falling very strongly towards average.
Now look at the female graph.
Like it says in the text, some 80% of guys fall as BELOW AVERAGE, and not just a southbound shift of the bell-curve, the distribution falls HEAVILY and sharply between 0 and 2!
Seriously?! Western (and mostly American, as that's the demographic that uses the site) women are so unbelievably out-of-touch. I mean, as I look around here in the U.S. men hold up a hell of a lot better than ladies do, and fewer of them balloon up like an grilled Oscar Meyer the first year of college... yet they think we're all dogs. Orly?
Thoughts? Also, take a look at some of the other statistics on there... there is some seriously interesting and shocking stuff (like how over 50% of white women would "strongly" prefer to date within their own race). I've been looking for some hard numbers like this for a long time.
Your Looks And Online Dating, OK Cupid Trends Blog
OKC, a fairly large, free dating site (of which I've personally had no luck whatsoever meeting even one girl off) compiled the data on photo ratings of guys and girls, some ~300,000 ratings, and I'm not surprised at all at the result, but somehow still shocked.
Males rated females on a almost symmetrical "camel hump" if you will... better extrapolated, probably pretty close to the bell-curve that occurs in nature, with the bulk of lades falling very strongly towards average.
Now look at the female graph.
Seriously?! Western (and mostly American, as that's the demographic that uses the site) women are so unbelievably out-of-touch. I mean, as I look around here in the U.S. men hold up a hell of a lot better than ladies do, and fewer of them balloon up like an grilled Oscar Meyer the first year of college... yet they think we're all dogs. Orly?
Thoughts? Also, take a look at some of the other statistics on there... there is some seriously interesting and shocking stuff (like how over 50% of white women would "strongly" prefer to date within their own race). I've been looking for some hard numbers like this for a long time.