SEXUAL UTOPIA IN POWER( every man must read )

[evan12]

http://dontmarry.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/sexualutopia.pdf

skip the introduction but don't skip the rest of chapters

 

[HoneyHitter]

This sums up a lot of what's being talked about on this forum. Excellent!

 

[evan12]

In Canada when most of this book apply on women here , yet if I talk about these things even to men , they look at me like I am coming from another planet .
have you guys talked with your families or friends (non PUA types ) about these subjects ? and what is there reaction

 

[Burroughs]

great article

this paragraphs tells you everything you need to know about women and their secret inner thoughts

It is possible, however, to enable women to mate hypergamously, i.e., with the most sexually attractive (handsome or socially dominant) men. In the Ecclesiazusae of Aristophanes the women of Athens stage a coup d’état. They occupy the legislative assembly and barricade their husbands out. Then they proceed to enact a law by which the most attractive males of the city will be compelled to mate with each female in turn, beginning with the least attrac- tive. That is the female sexual utopia in power. Aristophanes had a better understanding of the female mind than the average husband.

 

[evan12]

this paragraphs tells you everything you need to know about women and their secret inner thoughts

a lot of men live in a pink world when they think woman is waiting for her price and she will love him regardless of any thing happen . and even with that we have not to forget he was the Price , the alpha and and the top male in that area .
all Cinderella and snow white and other stories the hero is price so no wounder the woman will show love to him

 

[typical]

I read it but I don't agree with it at all. It reads like a feminist that has realized the wrongs of their teaching and in disguise is trying to once again make men commit to women under any all reasons. My example for this is the various statements regarding shotgun marriages and all.

The writer uses nature as a way of reinforcing the ideal of monogamy and how in nature the male displays and the female chooses and this is meant to be detrimental for the majority of males.

I call BULLSH!T on the entire pdf, why heres why ...

In nature it has always been and always will be survival of the fittest strongest fastest nothing more nothing less. In higher order mammals there is always 2 sexes one that has a higher level of testosterone and one with a very tiny amount. In most higher order mammals there are family groups that are dominated but at least 1 or 2 individuals that have higher levels of testosterone and are the alpha members of their groups. These individuals have first serve rights.

Civilization was created by going against this natural instinct, and most civilizations have fallen due to the males realizing that what they have created has not given them a better standard of living but has enslaved them to the civilization to do what is deemed "morally right".

There has never been and never will be 1 man for 1 woman, it is stupid to even think like this, going back to monogamy won't fix anything but will only lull men into a false sense of security that "everything is alright". This pdf only serves to further this civilization nothing more.

We have to realize that the usefulness of this current modern civilization has run its course and it NEEDS to fall. We need to go back to ancient ways so that men and women both realize that only the fittest can reproduce and that the weak individuals with weak genes don't reproduce.

This is the only way, the system needs a complete reboot nothing more will do.

p.s I could type more and elaborate more but I can't be bothered right now.

 

[Down Low]

Interesting read. I like the parts about "date rape" and "sexual harrassment." The same logic could be applied to the notions of "stalking" and "rape within marriage." But I don't see how a guy could make a Trotsky-like comparison of Jacobins and Bolsheviks, but miss that rape is a violation of the property rights of the father or husband -- not primarily a crime of violating customs about modesty.

The guy just struggles to get a handle on why so many women act childishly. Good try, 'A' for effort, but it's like he never had a LTR with a level-headed woman from a third-world sh1t hole.

The whole thing comes off as too academic and theoretical and abstract. He puts way, way too much emphasis on the Kinsey Report and Playboy and Cosmo -- sort of the Great Man Theory of history, a narrative of who did what where when and why. Like he gets his information mostly from newspapers and other journals, rather than from his own life experiences.

✫ one star

 

[evan12]

how in nature the male displays and the female chooses and this is meant to be detrimental for the majority of males.

it is correct when the male dont have a tool to force the female , but when a male has a way to force the female to the sex act he usually don't wait for her .
some males use violence like monkeys so when agressive male approach the female she gives them her pvssy to inseminate her
in human a man is usually far more strong than a female and he can force her (as what was happen in all the history ) . but with current laws it will be a big risk and very criminal .

 

[evan12]

The whole thing comes off as too academic and theoretical and abstract.

yes he is a professor , at best he had may be passed by 3 women in all his life so dont expect from him to have PUA experience