Sarah Palin is bangable

[Truman181]

Impression of Obama:

'Something something CHANGE!

Yes We Can!"

 

[speakeasy]

I wouldn't feel safe at night to know that we have a guy who wants to "talk" to the terrorists.

You're a perfect example of the type of low-information voter that McCain is relying on to win him the election. Prove me wrong though, go on google and find some quotes where Obama said he wants to "talk to terrorists". Obama has said repeatedly that the real enemy is Al Queda and that the war in Iraq diverted resources to a scenario we should not have been in given that Iraq had ZERO connection to 9/11. He has repeatedly says that we need to be focusing our military engagement in Afghanistan where Al Queda is based, not in Iraq. And somehow you, in your ignorance construes this as wanting to "talk to terrorists". What terrorists exactly??? Do you believe this nonsense because Sean Hannity tells you?

All of the biased liberal news media's attack on Sarah Palin did nothing but help their campaign.

Palin won't even make self available to the press. I'd be more worried about that fact than anything else. A woman who claims to be tough as nails who may end up being leader of the country doesn't have the guts to face the media, yet alone foreign threats out there. Say what you want about Obama, but the guy ain't gonna shy away from tough questions and interviews and he's demonstrated that he has a brain of his own and can speak freely without the help of a teleprompter telling him what to say using words someone else wrote, like Palin for example. Give him that much credit. Secondly, why the f-ck should the media NOT be critical of someone who will be heartbeat away from the presidency. She was an unknown 2 weeks ago, the women recently admitted she doesn't even know what the VP job does. She has said in the past that she has no opinion on the Iraq war. Dammit, the media OUGHT to be doing its job by asking her tought question. That's in the best interest of the country. Obama has been facing tough question in debates and press conferences for the last year and a half. She is now thrown in the limelight and runs from the press like a scared little girl. I hope the media keeps the pressure on her.

I think Sarah was an excellent choice for VP.

Really? Give me 3 intelligent reasons why before I demolish you.

Barack Obama can kiss my ass with all of that change talk. He hasn't told us what kind of change it will be.

He has told us his plans time and time again. If you don't know by now, you are clearly too ill-informed to even have a valid opinion. A simply trip to his website would answer the questions if you didn't have the patience to sit through the primary debates or listen to his acceptance speech. If you are ignorant of his policies, then it's due to your own choosing.

Well I could say a lot more, but I'm going to go watch fox news. That's only real channel that isn't liberal. Cnn, Nbc, Abc, and Cbs all should be taken off of the air.

LOL, never heard of the first amendment huh? Take programming off the air just because you don't agree with them? Sounds like fascism to me. Palin is your perfect choice, she tried to ban books in Alaska that she didn't agree with.

Anyways, thats my opinion. And this is America, so I have the right to say whatever I want.

Unless of course you are CNN, NBC, ABC or CBS right? lol

 

[ready123]

Now now, what did I tell you about staying off of moveon.org? The President didn't "decide" to invade Iraq for "whatever reason." I don't know if you were watching the news the past 7 years or not, but you see, there was this incident where 19 guys flew jets into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon which killed 3,000 innocent civilians. THEN, we learned that Saddam Hussein (a ruthless dictator that was the leader of aforementioned nation) was harboring members of the terrorist organization that these terrorists belonged to. After the War on Terror was declared, Iraq fell under the banner of a nation that was harboring terrorists and perhaps even hiding weapons of mass destruction. Put all these factors into play and combine the fact that Saddam violated the ceasefire agreement, and you've got yourself a full-blown conflict.

Go read Richard Clarke's book. He worked as Counter-Terrorism advisor under both parties and with the exception of Clinton, they were all Republican presidents. He gives his account of everything that happened from Reagan on and at the end concludes that Bush was totally misguided

Because of Bush, Osama is still free, Pakistan, Iran, and North Korea are growing more dangerous, and we don't have enough troops to handle any of them because they're all in Iraq. And a big chunk of them are National Guard, who aren't even trained for that kind of combat

 

[Desdinova]

You can all guess why this thread is closed.