RLE: What A High Quality Woman Looks Like

[lgbs2004]

so then why care so much about our opinion? seems to me that YOU are seeking approval in this thread, and when some people view it differently, you try to put them down and attack.
look, it's your girl, your pedestal, your life and your pink glass. if it is ok for you, go for it, you can even delude yourself into thinking like some of our "happily married" posters here, who sing a praise of their wifes every day here lika an incantation, in time maybe even they will believe it.
seeing reality is NOT being jaded. actually i bet some of the posters you labeled as jaded and butthurt, are doing just fine and boning a bunch of girls without searching desperately for someone to fill their empty pedestals.
the truth is, there is no quality women on the long term. theyare almost all quality at first, then they cheat on you, leave you, nag you, and manipulate you. denying this and labeling those who see reality as "jaded" will not change anything.
if it is good for you, go for it. it is clear from the OP that the reason for posting was to get some validation and it kinda backfired and now you fight off the "naysayers". our opinions do not matter, and it is your decision if you take advices ot just want a pat on the head.
and girls posting everything they do... OP's girl is not the worst kind lol, just look at facebook and the spam of all the ****ty food pictures and moronic status messages.

TL;DR: your girl may or mey not be a quality woman for us. if it is for you, all the better. people with different life experiences have different opinions. it is how it should be.

^THIS^

 

[sylvester the cat]

I can certainly understand your point.

Exception and I have had a few run ins which escalated and I certainly know he has multiple times played the "bitter" card as an out when he is losing a discussion on red pill concepts (another "attack the person and not the content" debate tactic.


Having said that, I will not hold that against him when he makes what I consider a reasonable post. Part of our job as red-pill men is to help others through the conversion process. Some will fight it vehemently before turning (while still others will fight it forever). Exception strikes me as the type who will come around eventually and it would be a mistake to alienate him based on previous encounters. But then, I could be wrong.

TRANSLATION:

I, Danger, self-proclaimed red-pill man declare The Exception to be a blue-pill man (albeit with the potential to become red-pill) on the basis that he does not agree with everything that I say. Once he agrees with everything I say (as he will) then and only then shall I grant him red-pill status.

 

[sylvester the cat]

Sylvester,

You seem intent on picking a fight with me. Very well.


Exceptions problem with me that I referenced stems back to his calling me "bitter" or "fear based" for establishing rules by which I will and will not commit. Mainly, I will not commit to women who insist on keeping orbiters around.

Using standard trope ad hominem attacks such as "bitter" because I have standards higher than committing to a h0r is what I consider blue-pill cathedralist mentality. Perhaps you disagree. If so, fantastic, go marry a h0r. I know several and can recommend a couple who give fantastic bl0wjobs.

Well now. Who's using ad hominem attacks on whom here? By assuming I am a lover of wh0res you are attempting to assassinate my character.

No intent on my part to pick a fight with you. But I do know how much you enjoy a tussle of the linguistic variety. Any chance to show off that fine erudition you have, no? You should be thanking me.

 

[sylvester the cat]

• I see now you have immediately made this about ME as opposed to the subject, where I educated you on WHY I made the assessment of blue-pill.
• If you go back and reread my post, you will note that I did not accuse you of anything, I said "Using standard trope ad hominem attacks such as "bitter" because I have standards higher than committing to a h0r is what I consider blue-pill cathedralist mentality. Perhaps you disagree. If so, fantastic, go marry a h0r."

I do not enjoy any such tussle. Nor do I back down when someone decides to come along and make personal attacks.


I said what constitutes blue-pill in my opinion. That includes being called names for having standards about dating h0rs.


It seems logical that if you think it is ok to place the "bitter" label on those men with standards about dating h0rs, then you would be ok with marrying one. No accusations, just plain logic.

Your ad hominem attack was not logical no. If anything it is a straw man argument.

You are arguing that I am defending The Exception's 'bitter' label and must be ok with marrying wh0res on the basis of what? A tongue-in-cheek translation of something you said.

The subject matter is about whether or not The Exception's gfriend is low or high quality based on the fact that she did some washing up. As I do not have enough information to make that judgement my position on that is non-existent. For all I or anyone else knows she suck3d the neighbour off 5 minutes before.

 

[:-)]

^ You know an argument has gone too far when you start using bullet points ^

 

[Desdinova]

10 INPUT THREAD=SH!T ; U$
20 PRINT "Hello you d!ckheads who spend wasted energy on this phucked up thread" ; U$
25 REM
30 INPUT C0CK INTO UR A$$
40 FOR U = EETSH!T
45 NEXT POSTER = U EETSH!T 2
50 SET A$$ = TheException
60 If A$$ is LICKING his own A$SS then goto 100
100 END THREAD
/THREAD

?THREAD OVERFLOW ERROR IN 45

READY.
_