Protests in France

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,582
Reaction score
1,605
Roflmao you still don't understand it do you?

Or you're trying to lie once more?

Either way here's the truth;
I already answered this. Intent does not matter.

Printing reduces the value of currency regardless of whether you want to differentiate by intent (devaluation or depreciation).

But socialists of the world such as yourself think this does not cause the currency to drop in value.
 

Spaz

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
6,398
Reaction score
4,720
Location
Somewhere where's it's none of your business
I already answered this. Intent does not matter.

Printing reduces the value of currency regardless of whether you want to differentiate by intent (devaluation or depreciation).

But socialists of the world such as yourself think this does not cause the currency to drop in value.
Stop lying.

This is the truth.
The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.

The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.

The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.

Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
 

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,582
Reaction score
1,605

Spaz

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
6,398
Reaction score
4,720
Location
Somewhere where's it's none of your business
Tell me what is wrong with my statement. What is factually incorrect?
You should tell me which is factually incorrect with mine;

The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.

The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.

The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.

Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
 

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,582
Reaction score
1,605
You should tell me which is factually incorrect with mine;

LOL, your emotions still have a grip on you.

Yours has nothing to do with the originating argument on whether or not printing reduces the value of a currency.

It does not negate my argument at all.
 

How This "Nice Guy" Steals Women from Jerks

Did you know a woman can be totally UN-ATTRACTED to you...

And she'll still sleep with you?

If you've ever seen a girl go home with some asshole she didn't even LIKE, you know this is true.

But how is this possible?

Because deep inside her brain, sexual desire has nothing to do with what you LOOK like...

And everything to do with how you make her FEEL.

Matt Cook knows this all too well.

Matt is a nice guy... but he steals women from JERKS all the time.

In this free video training below, he'll show you how he does it:

How to Control Her Emotions and Make Her Chase You

Spaz

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
6,398
Reaction score
4,720
Location
Somewhere where's it's none of your business
LOL, your emotions still have a grip on you.

Yours has nothing to do with the originating argument on whether or not printing reduces the value of a currency.

It does not negate my argument at all.
More lies to spread deceit within the thread.

If you cannot dispute my statement, then it nullifies all your statements as lies, again dispute this statement as not true;

The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.

The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.

The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.

Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
 

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,582
Reaction score
1,605
More lies to spread deceit within the thread.

If you cannot dispute my statement, then it nullifies all your statements as lies, again dispute this statement as not true;
And how does it dispute my claim that printing reduces the value of money?
 

Spaz

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
6,398
Reaction score
4,720
Location
Somewhere where's it's none of your business
And how does it dispute my claim that printing reduces the value of money?
Stop lying and stop trying to insult the intelligence of people reading the thread.

Answer Yes or No to the truth of this statement;

The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.

The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.

The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.

Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
 

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,582
Reaction score
1,605
Stop lying and stop trying to insult the intelligence of people reading the thread.

Answer Yes or No to the truth of this statement;

Yeah, that's what I thought. This does not dispute my statement at all. You just skip the final statement that the actual printing is what brings the intent of devaluation to reality in a permanent fashion.

Enjoy your hallmark movie, I'm going upstairs to fvk my girl.
 

Spaz

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
6,398
Reaction score
4,720
Location
Somewhere where's it's none of your business
Yeah, that's what I thought. This does not dispute my statement at all. You just skip the final statement that the actual printing is what brings the intent of devaluation to reality in a permanent fashion.

Enjoy your hallmark movie, I'm going upstairs to fvk my girl.
Cant answer yes or no and now parading more lies to cover your deceit..

Again Yes or No to this truth;

The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.

The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.

The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.

Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
 

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,582
Reaction score
1,605
Cant answer yes or no and now parading more lies to cover your deceit..

Again Yes or No to this truth;
It is misleading and you know it. I have made some slight adjustments to enure it is true and CLEAR, as shown below.


The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.

The printing of more money is the consequences of that intent.

The actual devaluation of the currency is the consequence of the printing.
 

Spaz

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
6,398
Reaction score
4,720
Location
Somewhere where's it's none of your business
It is misleading and you know it. I have made some slight adjustments to enure it is true and CLEAR, as shown below.
Modifying my post and then projecting it as mine shows your deceitful nature.

Stop spreading more lies and answer the questions; YES or NO to my statement below;

The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.

The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.

The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.

Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
 

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,582
Reaction score
1,605
Modifying my post and then projecting it as mine shows your deceitful nature.

Stop spreading more lies and answer the questions; YES or NO to my statement below;

I told everyone I modified it and highlighted what I modified. No deceit from me at all, but thanks for exposing yourself to everyone.

Yours was missing key information which could mislead less knowledgeable people.

Do you disagree with the clarified version?
 

Spaz

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
6,398
Reaction score
4,720
Location
Somewhere where's it's none of your business
I told everyone I modified it and highlighted what I modified. No deceit from me at all, but thanks for exposing yourself to everyone.

Yours was missing key information which could mislead less knowledgeable people.

Do you disagree with the clarified version?
Stop being deceitful and then trying to lie your way out of it.

If you disagree with my statement then provide a concise arguement after you're answered NO to this statement;

The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.

The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.

The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.

Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
 

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,582
Reaction score
1,605
Stop being deceitful and then trying to lie your way out of it.

If you disagree with my statement then provide a concise arguement after you're answered NO to this statement;
Stop being emotional and go paint your nails to calm down

I gave a concise answer and the correction needed.

Look at the new version with my corrections and you will see what was missing.
 
Read the 22 Rules for Massive Success with Women. Everything you need to know to become a huge success with women. And it's free!

Spaz

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
6,398
Reaction score
4,720
Location
Somewhere where's it's none of your business
Stop being emotional and go paint your nails to calm down

I gave a concise answer and the correction needed.

Look at the new version with my corrections and you will see what was missing.
More misdirections to hide the fact that you're lying, and trying to deceive readers here with your deceitful propaganda/innuendos.

Yes or No to the truth of my statement. If it's not true then be brave to say NO. If it's true then be brave to concede.

Stop being a headless chicken.

The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.

The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.

The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.

Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
 

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,582
Reaction score
1,605
More misdirections to hide the fact that you're lying, and trying to deceive readers here with your deceitful propaganda/innuendos.

Yes or No to the truth of my statement. If it's not true then be brave to say NO. If it's true then be brave to concede.

Stop being a headless chicken.
I take it the nail painting did not help calm you down? How about a glass of wine with your cats?

It is clear that I am trying to get something we agree on, by my adding clarifying elements to your statements.

It is also clear you just want to argue, as you are not interested in further improving upon that statement.

You have basically lied by omission (A female tactic).

There are elements of truth in your statement, however statement 2 suggests that some action has already been taken towards permanent devaluatuon (This suggestion is false). This is why I changed "action" to "intent". You never actually included the action that delivers the permanent devaluation.

Then I added the actual act of devaluation (printing) to the end.

Is there something you disagree with here?
 
Last edited:

Spaz

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
6,398
Reaction score
4,720
Location
Somewhere where's it's none of your business
I take it the nail painting did not help calm you down? How about a glass of wine with your cats?

It is clear that I am trying to get something we agree on, by my adding clarifying elements to your statements.

It is also clear you just want to argue, as you are not interested in further improving upon that statement.

There are elements of truth in your statement, however statement 2 suggests that some action has already been taken towards permanent devaluatuon (This suggestion is false). This is why I changed "action" to "intent".

Then I added the actual act of devaluation (printing) to the end.

Is there something you disagree with here?
My statement can either be true or false, saying it's true then changing is as a false is a deceitful tactic used by liars.

Is that a yes or a no to the truthfulness of my statement below ?

Hurry up and stop with the dilly-dallying tactics. You had a whole day to come up with lies to counter this truth.

The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.

The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.

The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.

Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
 

Danger

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
10,582
Reaction score
1,605
My statement can either be true or false, saying it's true then changing is as a false is a deceitful tactic used by liars.

Is that a yes or a no to the truthfulness of my statement below ?

Hurry up and stop with the dilly-dallying tactics. You had a whole day to come up with lies to counter this truth.

Let me repeat a statement from above, since you likely replied while I added it (and you refuse to address it in the changes I made to your novice explanation, or perhaps you are just incapable of understanding).


You have basically lied by omission (A female tactic...maybe your women's intuition made you do it).

There are elements of truth in your statement, however statement 2 suggests that some action has already been taken towards permanent devaluatuon (This suggestion is false). This is why I changed "action" to "intent". You never actually included the action that delivers the permanent devaluation.

Then I added the actual act of devaluation (printing) to the end.

Is there something you disagree with here?
 
Last edited:

TyTe`EyEz

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
2,397
Reaction score
615
Age
34
Of what? Be specific.

I was referring to your statement that if everyone was poor, there would be no corruption.

Bull**** statement #1. This is a strawman fallacy. Which liberal advocated making everyone poor?

You didn't say it, but you implied it. You're dodging it now, as every liberal does.


No, you made a false statement when you said "great many" people are gaming the welfare system. This is an anecdotal fallacy.

Please tell me how this is a fallacy. Where do you live? Do you not know someone that's gaming the system? I know of many.

This is Bull**** statement #2. Here you imply that anyone who thinks America shouldn't socialize the rich feels that way out of jealousy.

I never said America should pay for the rich, only that she shouldn't pay for the parasitic, poor underclass. Especially when people like you advocate open borders.
Responses in bold.
 
Last edited:
Top