You said the term reptilian brain is not scientific. I showed it is.
You said the Categoric Imperativ has nothing to do with the "golden law". I showed it does.
“Reptilian brain” is not scientific at all. No one uses the triune model in brain-related field except when explaining things to your average layman, which is EXACTLY why I said you don’t know what you’re talking about. People just use it because it’s a simple & easy way of saying something (whether an act, behavior, habit, tendency, etc.) is deeply engrained within us, but they never use it to actually describe regions of the brain like that because it’s just not accurate. Why? Because ffs the brainstem does NOT control our sense of ‘morals’ or our ‘fight-or-flight’ response, that’s ridiculous. All of these things are controlled by the limbic system. And ‘higher morals’ don’t come from the neocortex, that’s just responsible for your ability to think and your awareness/cognizance.
As for the Categorical Imperative—I’ve explained what this is to you like 3 times already, but you keep conflating it with the ‘golden rule’. The golden rule according, to Kant, is
an imperative; it is not
the Categorical Imperative though, which is what you’ve basically been arguing the whole time. That would be like telling someone that because a Buick is a car that therefore all cars are Buicks; that’s just not right lmao
Even more, in that very same link you posted, it LITERALLY says in caps, bold, and underline several times that the Categorical Imperative is not the same as the golden rule:
Here’s some more quotes from that very same link that work completely against you:
“[The Categorical Imperative] is not a command to perform specific actions” (second sentence)
“It does not say, "follow the 10 commandments", or "respect your elders". (also second sentence)
“It is simply formal procedure by which to evaluate any action about which might be morally relevant.” (third sentence)
“[By] nature (according to Kant) the moral law is universal and impartial and rational.” (first sentence, second paragraph; universality + impartiality is exactly what I’ve been saying the Categorical imperative is, and rationality proves that “primitive” morals are anything but of the ‘lizard brain’, which is what you’ve been saying)
“[The] categorical is a way of formulating the criteria by which any action can pass the test of universality, impartiality, and rationality. That is it’s only function.” (second sentence, second paragraph)
“Because the same result cannot be obtained by application of the Categorical Imperative, it follows that the Golden Rule and the Categorical Imperative are not extensionally equivalent.” (the sentence above the highlighted portion in the second picture)
You’ve consistently shown you don’t know what you’re talking about and are just choosing cherrypicked quotes without any knowledge of the background information to understand what it even is that you’re quoting. Case in point:
countries liked to make wars is they had too many man
Countries liked to make wars because the male population was too high. This is despite the fact that numerous civilizations throughout history purposefully chose to kill female infants in favor of male infants.
Also, it’s *men, not “man”.
Specifically poor men? Ancient Rome, one of, if not, the most well-known nation to ever rise up, didn’t allow poor men to fight in their armies. It wasn’t until near the end of the Roman Republic when Gaius Marius instituted military reforms to prevent the downfall of Rome. This happened throughout history too, not just in Rome.
“All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone.” Now, there's some science behind that statement.
Opinion ≠ science, wtf???
The term “frontal cortex” isn’t correct here. It’s either your
prefrontal cortex, or your frontal
lobe when you talk about higher executive functions.
The reptilian brain, the oldest of the three
people sometimes work with their lizard brain
Before, it was just a euphemism. Now, it’s actually a part of the brain. Cuz lizard brains TOTALLY exist inside of human brains, got it.
Impulsive person can not be moral
Being passionate about something is a sin, I guess lol
sitting in the room by yourself can be a marker if you can keep a moral standard.
Sitting by yourself doing nothing makes you a moral person... yeah....
An impulsive person can not think deep to figure out in a certain environment.
Is this even English?
*sure
in the long winters indoors you might get bored and do some boom boom.
In SEA for example life was never really hard at all because they don't have a winter. They had plenty of time sex becomes then a hobby.
people made babies because they were bored
.